Assist legal analysts in tracking events in
multiple court proceedings for monthly tracking reports
He then failed to attend
multiple court proceedings, the status review application was dismissed, and the court order required the father to obtain leave of the court prior to bringing any future status review applications.
Not exact matches
Acting in a complex and high value partnership dispute involving allegations of dishonesty and misappropriation leading to
multiple English
Court proceedings and related disputes in Jersey, Thailand, Hong Kong and the BVI.
Whereas the costs of implementing the injunction might not be deterring themselves, the costs for the formal notice as well as costs for
court proceedings might, especially in the case of
multiple injunctions, amount to a substantial sum of money.
It also involved the negotiation of consents from
multiple UK government departments, including the Home Office and Department of Health, and the settlement of a number of disputes and ongoing
court proceedings between Airwave and the UK government.
Representation of a major German paper manufacturer in antidumping
proceedings involving
multiple Commerce Department administrative reviews, Commerce Department and International Trade Commission sunset reviews, and several active cases in the
Court of International Trade
He has appeared in
court proceedings in England concerning arbitration including PT Thiess v KPC and Standard Chartered Bank [2011] EWHC 68 (Comm)(interaction between arbitral jurisdiction under substantive contract and high
court jurisdiction under security documentation); Barrington - Hume v AA Mutual International Insurance Company Ltd (composite insurance — whether
multiple arbitrations), Sheltam Rail v Mirambo [2008] 2 Lloyds Rep 195 (discontinuance of
proceedings under 1996 Act) and National Power Plc v National Grid Plc..
His business litigation practice typically involves significant cases with
multiple parties,
multiple claims and often
multiple proceedings in federal and state
courts.
Serve as lead trial counsel in consolidated
proceedings involving more than 13,000 individual lawsuits related to client's medical device, including cases consolidated in federal
court by the JPML and parallel actions in
multiple state
courts across the country.
Matt has argued before
multiple state and federal
courts in the U.S., and has been directly involved in a number of trials, arbitrations, and appeals, including major ICSID bilateral investment treaty arbitrations and ICC arbitrations; a notable trial victory before the
Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware; and
proceedings before the High
Court of Australia.
We represent our clients in all types of regional, national and cross-border insolvency matters, ranging in size and complexity from out of
court loan workouts and financial restructurings to bankruptcy
proceedings in
multiple jurisdictions, creditors» rights litigation and distressed acquisitions.
A recent Federal Circuit case demonstrates the complexity of resolving difficult claim construction issues in
multiple agency and
court proceedings.
When
multiple civil actions involving one or more common questions of fact are pending in several different federal district
courts, those actions can sometimes be transferred to one district
court for coordinated and consolidated management and pretrial
proceedings under a single judge.
Successfully represented producer of snow and ice management equipment in
multiple patent infringement actions in district
courts and parallel IPR
proceedings in USPTO.
We have also acted in
multiple pre-action litigation issues and in high profile
Court of Appeal trade mark infringement
proceedings.
Represented a law firm in state and federal
court proceedings against litigation trust,
multiple plaintiff groups, and an investor class bringing claims for securities fraud and legal malpractice
«The
Court has been critical of situations where
multiple proceedings have been taken in respect of the same patent under the NOC Regulations where a previous determination has been made as to the justification of allegations as to infringement and / or validity.
At the very least, the Collaborative Process avoids time and cost - consuming litigation and adversarial
proceedings, such as depositions, examinations of
multiple expert witnesses, and the time consumed when attorneys have to be paid to wait for hours to be heard, as well as the
court hearings themselves.