When Plaintiff brought Architectural Firms into the case as
Defendants, General
Contractor aggressively attempted to shift blame to Architectural Firms based on alleged professional negligence, designating
multiple experts on the subject.
Attorneys for both plaintiffs and
defendants will find comprehensive coverage of such matters as: the advantages and disadvantages of suits based on strict liability, negligence and breach of warranty; the use of state consumer protection statutes; the duty to warn and its innumerable ramifications; the liability of the manufacturers, retailers and other potential
defendants in the distribution chain; successor liability; federal preemption of common law claims; monitoring product safety during design, manufacturing and distribution; causation theories in actions involving
multiple manufacturers; product misuse and alteration; the elements of proof needed in an action; recovery for economic loss; punitive damages; and the government
contractor defense.
After suffering negative effects from over-sedation during a knee surgery, appellee sued
multiple defendants including appellant, a hospital district management
contractor for negligence.