Joint and several liability is a doctrine that permits a plaintiff who is able to show that
multiple defendants caused her injury to recover the full amount from any one of them.
Not exact matches
«This is going to
cause great uncertainty going forward in complex litigation against
multiple defendants in federal courts and in state cases with plaintiffs in one state and a
defendant in another state.»
The plaintiff had a common law relationship with the former husband of the
defendant, and the
defendant acknowledged looking at the plaintiff's bank information without just
cause or reason on
multiple occasions.
In Clements v. Clements,, 2012 SCC 32, the Supreme Court of Canada re-affirmed the primacy of the «but for» test in proving causation and confined the alternate «material contribution» test to cases involving
multiple negligent
defendants where it is not possible to prove which one
caused the injury.
$ 80,000 — Dog bite results in
multiple injuries (Sep 2016) The
Defendant's dog chased the Plaintiff into her garage and attacked her,
causing multiple wounds to her knee, thigh, calf and arm.
A $ 700,000 settlement for a client who claimed that the
defendant neurosurgeon's negligence
caused or substantially contributed to a three - year delay in the diagnosis of the plaintiff's
multiple sclerosis, during which time the plaintiff's MS progressed untreated.
In cases where there are
multiple defendants, the Court of Appeal directs that a jury must first consider whether the collective negligence
caused the plaintiff's injuries.
This decision should resolve the unfair conundrum that
multiple defendants may be negligent but each could avoid liability by suggesting that the negligence of each other
caused the injury.
For example, while no one particular
defendant's negligence alone may be sufficient to have
caused the plaintiff's injuries, the collective negligence of
multiple defendants may have
caused the plaintiff's injuries.
Some stakeholders GAO interviewed said that the increase in 2011 was most likely influenced by the anticipation of changes in the 2011 Leahy - Smith America Invents Act (AIA), which made several significant changes to the U.S. patent system, including limiting the number of
defendants in a lawsuit,
causing some plaintiffs that would have previously filed a single lawsuit with
multiple defendants to break the lawsuit into
multiple lawsuits.