Not exact matches
Businesses have earning reports and stock prices as
measures of success;
schools seeking
multiple purposes — see above — are expected to show immediate, midterm, and long - term results, many
of whichare hardly reducible to numbers.
College / Career Indicator Reports and Data The College / Career Indicator uses
multiple measures to provide a performance level based on the number
of students who are likely prepared for
success after high
school.
They show that 1) Different academic indicators
measure very different aspects
of school performance, suggesting that states should be allowed and encouraged to make full use of multiple measures to identify schools in the way they see fit instead of reporting a summative rating; 2) The ESSA regulations effectively restrict the weighting of the non-academic «School Quality and Student Success» indicators to zero, which is not in the spirit of the expanded measurement; and 3) The majority of schools will be identified for targeted support under the current regulations, suggesting the need for a clarification in federal p
school performance, suggesting that states should be allowed and encouraged to make full use
of multiple measures to identify
schools in the way they see fit instead
of reporting a summative rating; 2) The ESSA regulations effectively restrict the weighting
of the non-academic «
School Quality and Student Success» indicators to zero, which is not in the spirit of the expanded measurement; and 3) The majority of schools will be identified for targeted support under the current regulations, suggesting the need for a clarification in federal p
School Quality and Student
Success» indicators to zero, which is not in the spirit
of the expanded measurement; and 3) The majority
of schools will be identified for targeted support under the current regulations, suggesting the need for a clarification in federal policy.
In
schools that are doing well, teachers and principals pay attention to
multiple measures of student
success.
Oregon is proposing that
schools will receive no overall letter grade or score but will instead use a
multiple -
measure dashboard
of indicators that reflect opportunities for students to learn, academic
success, and college and career readiness.
Despite high levels
of poverty in their communities, these
schools have sustained improvements on
multiple measures of student
success (achievement test scores, graduation rates, attendance rates, and behavior
measures); and national and state organizations have recognized and honored them for their achievements.
The
schools included in the table above did not meet any
of the initial criteria and the
Multiple Measure Review did not yield evidence
of student outcome
success and growth in achievement beyond that which is seen at other
schools.
Using
multiple measures, instead
of just test scores, to determine an education endeavor's
success can lead to enhanced student performance, better decision making, and a more comprehensive view
of school quality and student achievement.
ESSA also marks an important move toward a more holistic approach to accountability by encouraging
multiple measures of school and student
success.
States also have the flexibility to use
multiple indicators or to use
multiple measures within each indicator
of school quality or student
success.
WHEREAS, the San Diego Unified Vision 2020, long - term strategic plan, Quality
Schools in Every Neighborhood, supports and provides for quality teaching, access to broad and challenging curriculum for all students, closing the achievement gap with high expectations for all, and is committed to using
multiple formative
measures of success that go beyond standardized achievement tests; and
In California, the use
of other
measures in addition to placement exams (known as
multiple measures) is mandated by law — in fact, research shows that
measures such as high
school achievement data do a comparable or better job at predicting college
success.
In
schools that perform well, teachers and principals tend to establish high expectations for students and pay attention to
multiple measures of student
success.
High
schools are evaluated on an innovative «Prepared for
Success» component, which includes
multiple measures of college and career readiness and is weighted 15 %
of their total measurement scale.
Alongside teachers, I am curious how continuing annual testing in grades 3 - 8 and once in high
school reduces «the burden
of testing on students and teachers, making sure that tests don't crowd out teaching and learning» and how the continued significance
of student test scores (despite the law's important shift to include
multiple measures of success for students) will alter a test - prep culture that narrows the curriculum.
Charter
schools that meet ANY ONE
of the initial filters OR demonstrate academic
success through the
Multiple Measure Review meet the academic threshold for CCSA's full advocacy support for renewal or replication.
Schools with higher levels
of student achievement are more likely than others to have principals who establish high expectations for students and teachers and are attentive to
multiple measures of student
success.
In efficacy studies
of over 7,000 students in major
school districts, students who used
Success Highways improved across
multiple measures: