We not only had the ability to seek out
multiple medical opinions to make the most informed decision, we also knew the decision was 100 percent ours to make.
Not exact matches
Example: An attachment parent might seek out
multiple opinions on a child's
medical issue and would be open to learning about alternative methods of treatment.
The Court of Appeal has effectively eliminated the ability to strike a jury on the grounds of complexity, length and
multiple conflicting
medical opinion (Rados v. Pannu, 2015 BCCA 459).
Further to my previous posts about Independent
Medical Exams in BC Supreme Court Injury Claims unpublished reasons for judgement recently came to my attention (Hou v. Kirmani BCSC Vancouver Registry, 20091119) dealing with the ability for a Defendant to have an injured party undergo
multiple exams where the first defence expert feels an
opinion from a second expert would be of benefit.
While Plaintiff's in personal injury lawsuits sometimes have to be subjected to
multiple defence
medical exams (DME) one well - settled principle is that subsequent exams to bolster a previous defence
opinion are not permitted.