On the other hand, there are
multiple teacher evaluation models that do not tie teacher evaluations to unfair, inappropriate and misleading standardized test results.
Not exact matches
The report tracked
teacher retention patterns alongside effectiveness levels from 2011 - 13, when the state first implemented its
multiple measures
evaluation system, the Tennessee Evaluator Acceleration
Model (TEAM).
Basis Policy Research and ATI have built a partnership supporting the fair
evaluation of educator effectiveness by implementing mathematical
models that include
multiple measures of student growth and which evaluate educator effectiveness using techniques that take into account a variety of factors that may impact student learning but over which the
teacher has no influence.
I also argued (but this was unfortunately not highlighted in this particular article), that I could not find anything about the New Mexico
model's output (e.g., indicators of reliability or consistency in terms of
teachers» rankings over time, indicators of validity as per, for example, whether the state's value - added output correlated, or not, with the other «
multiple measures» used in New Mexico's
teacher evaluation system), pretty much anywhere given my efforts.
The
model calls for 40 percent of
teachers»
evaluations to be based on student academic progress, as determined by
multiple measures of learning and achievement.
These
models use explicit standards to evaluate
teachers, are based on
multiple measures, and involve
multiple evaluators and
evaluations.