Sentences with phrase «mutually exclusive things»

These are not mutually exclusive things.

Those are not mutually exclusive things.

Two different mutually exclusive things can not be the same mutually exclusive thing as each other.

two mutually exclusive things can't both be right.

Not exact matches

Those things do not have to be mutually exclusive.

Instead I'll have periods where the general focus is work or family, but these things aren't mutually exclusive.»

Championing a candidate and championing the Kingdom are certainly not mutually exclusive, but they are far from the same thing.

So I still believe passionately that we need to celebrate singleness, as well as marriage, and I suppose that, especially now, I don't see those things as being at all mutually exclusive.

Whether this is the logical outworking of the metaphysical and anthropological premises of liberalism or a radically new thing — and Hans Jonas's analysis would suggest that these are not mutually exclusive alternatives — it marks a point of no return in American public philosophy.

Are these two things mutually - exclusive?

I don't see how our ability to discern things as or interpret things as mutually exclusive for certain conditions const itutes something immaterial.

These things are not at all mutually exclusive.

Those are two separate (and often mutually exclusive) things so much of the time.

As we've found with Trout, those two things aren't mutually exclusive.

These things aren't mutually exclusive.

But I don't think that having juice, having energy and some swag is mutually exclusive from those things,» Collins said.

Those things are not mutually exclusive at all.

These things are not mutually exclusive.

(changing lifestyles, creating things that reverse the co2 levels)... i don't think those people are mutually exclusive - just saying that those who see a herring, and those who don't - this is (probably) how they view solving the problem.

LGBT Labour has a lot of members who are also religious, the two things aren't mutually exclusive.

These companies have recognized that these two things are far from mutually exclusive.

While they're not mutually exclusive, they're certainly not the same thing.

We're here to tell you, those things are NOT mutually exclusive!

When a mutually beneficial relationship advances, it's completely acceptable to renegotiate your allowance, especially if things move from non-exclusive to exclusive or if you two decide you are going to invest more time together.

It tries real hard and does a lot of good things and maybe reveals these elements to be mutually exclusive, but it comes up a little short.

Even though those things don't need to be mutually exclusive — and without starting a huge political argument about what those things mean in the educational environment — I would simply point out that there is huge incentive to choose against quality in the name of reducing cost.

People are setting up this false dichotomy, people are making these things mutually exclusive, and they don't have to be.

The fact that stylish design and everyday practicality are not mutually exclusive is demonstrated by the large rear hatch and the low loading edge, which makes it easier to integrate more than just everyday things into the Panamera Sport Turismo — and your life.

My work acts to assert that fatness and femininity are not mutually exclusive concepts, and that fat is not a thing to be ashamed of.

For one thing, the R&D push being discussed should not be seen as being mutually exclusive with a carbon cap - and - trade system or a carbon tax of some sort.

Organically grown food, while a preferable choice for green shoppers in grocery stores and farmers markets, isn't necessarily the same thing as food grown using smart carbon farming practices, and though the two aren't mutually exclusive, demand for organics is driven more by marketing, while the other is still a bit of a mystery to the average person.

In the US, firms such as Barnes & Thornburg have mature programs for client value management and Weinberger says: «Firms have started to recognise that they can deliver better client service and improve profitability — those things are not mutually exclusive.»

These things do not have to be mutually exclusive.

Their favorite line appears to be that these two things — regulating and representing disparate interests — «are not mutually exclusive.»

These two things are not mutually exclusive.

While public and private blockchains are often pitched against each other, Baldet told CoinDesk in an interview, «I don't think those two things need to be so different or are necessarily mutually exclusive.»

The first thing that one needs to notice at this point is this: these two arguments are mutually exclusive.

Is the aforesaid something that you contemplate simultaneously with: the dollar values involved in the cost of extended market time, that was a result of an incompetent or deficient marketing campaign, or do you see these things as mutually exclusive and unrelated?