In this sense «tolerance» is not tactics, but an essential demand of the Church because with - out it she can not achieve her end, namely the free self - realization of man, who entrusts himself to God, the ultimate
mystery of his existence in faith, hope and love, a God who wants to give himself to man as his fulfilment and his absolute future in forgiveness and sanctification.
Not exact matches
The «traditionalist,» unless he can ground his position more firmly than
in a history or a nature so taken, hasn't moved very far toward the
mystery of his own existence, toward discovering a Mystery engulfing the limits of his ordering mind.
mystery of his own
existence, toward discovering a
Mystery engulfing the limits of his ordering mind.
Mystery engulfing the limits
of his ordering mind.»
In 1992, in the Casey opinion which confirmed America's unlimited abortion licence, Kennedy wrote that «at the heart of liberty is the right to define one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life»..
In 1992,
in the Casey opinion which confirmed America's unlimited abortion licence, Kennedy wrote that «at the heart of liberty is the right to define one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life»..
in the Casey opinion which confirmed America's unlimited abortion licence, Kennedy wrote that «at the heart
of liberty is the right to define one's own concept
of existence,
of meaning,
of the universe, and
of the
mystery of human life»....
It presents ever - new facets when
in the course
of the intellectual history
of mankind it is confronted with ever - new human experiences, because it points to the infinite
mystery of God as the centre
of our own
existence.
The real danger affecting both liturgical and private prayer is the apparent or real lack
of religious experience,
of the courageous belief that we may prayerfully invoke the profound
mystery of our
existence and
in doing so not only project ourselves and our needs.
The fourth step goes a bit further, to see «the trajectory eventuating
in the creation
of human historical
existence» not «as a metaphysical surd but rather as grounded
in the ultimate nature
of things,
in the ultimate
mystery.»
But just as her salvation gospels can not be entirely dismissed, his critique
of her can not be written off merely as rooted
in his personal bitterness and his misogynist jealousy
of her «boundless female strength,» There is something smug
in her
existence on a «special plane reserved for women with a privileged emotional life and a happier, more mundane adjustment to the
mysteries of life.»
Such an identity appears to be possible because, as Walsh claims (most clearly and emphatically
in The Third Millennium: Reflections on Faith and Reason), following Heidegger and Voegelin, the transcendent must be utterly «differentiated» from our worldly or secular
existence: the withdrawal
of the divine into utterly transcendent
mystery relieves existential - theological practice
of any ends «higher» than humanity.
man's special place
in the cosmos, his connexion with destiny, his relation to the world
of things, his understanding
of his fellowmen, his
existence as a being that knows it must die, his attitude
in the ordinary and extraordinary encounters with the
mystery with which his life is shot through.
The child knows the Thou before it knows the separated I. «But on the height
of personal
existence one must truly be able to say I
in order to know the
mystery of the Thou
in its whole truth.»
Does anyone on this blog truly believe that we can understand and explain the
mystery of billions
of years
of the cosmos and the natural world
in our pathetic 100 years
of existence?
In this sense, and only this sense, I am a deeply religious man... I am satisfied with the mystery of life's eternity and with a knowledge, a sense, of the marvelous structure of existence — as well as the humble attempt to understand even a tiny portion of the Reason that manifests itself in nature.&raqu
In this sense, and only this sense, I am a deeply religious man... I am satisfied with the
mystery of life's eternity and with a knowledge, a sense,
of the marvelous structure
of existence — as well as the humble attempt to understand even a tiny portion
of the Reason that manifests itself
in nature.&raqu
in nature.»
The metaphorical response to the saving act
of God
in history, that subtle and complex instance
of attending to ultimacy
in our immediacies, to the
mystery of the Kingdom
in the midst
of historical circumstances, is thus seen to be a persisting and unexpendable witness to the very realities that inform and sustain our authentic
existence.
It may be insight into the divine
mysteries, the nature
of Ultimate Reality, and
of the laws governing the
existence of the cosmos,
of society, and
of individual lives; or the gift
of restoring into wholeness broken physical or spiritual health; or the ability to develop, by teaching and
in other ways, the hidden possibilities
in one's fellow men, and to give direction and purpose to their lives.
Even
in this sense transcendence may have all the depth and richness I at least could ask:
mystery, ineffability, ecstasy, reunion and reconciliation, worlds upon worlds
of various sorts and stages
of existence, an ideal order
of which our experiences
of truth, beauty and goodness are fragmentary glimpses.
Whereas the latter aimed at guiding us through the liturgical seasons
of the year, this second publication encourages greater awareness
in our daily lives
of the
mysteries we already share, making explicit that which is so often obscured by sheer day - to - day
existence.
It is to devote oneself to working towards a fully humane world within the ecological restraints here on planet Earth, while standing
in piety and awe before the profound
mysteries of existence.»
In any event, The Mystery of Existence is not about the clash between classical and modern / personal forms of theism («theistic personalism»), a distinction that is anyway not directly on point in explicating Nothing (our limited mission again), since in either case, classical or modern / personal, God can be in some sense necessar
In any event, The
Mystery of Existence is not about the clash between classical and modern / personal forms
of theism («theistic personalism»), a distinction that is anyway not directly on point
in explicating Nothing (our limited mission again), since in either case, classical or modern / personal, God can be in some sense necessar
in explicating Nothing (our limited mission again), since
in either case, classical or modern / personal, God can be in some sense necessar
in either case, classical or modern / personal, God can be
in some sense necessar
in some sense necessary.
In The
Mystery of Existence, he has added a classification
of nine «Levels
of Nothing,» a response to contemporary confusion.
The libertine guardians
of the sexual revolution brook no dissent from the idea, so famously articulated
in Casey vs. Planned Parenthood, that «at the heart
of liberty is the right to define one's own concept
of existence,
of meaning,
of the universe, and
of the
mystery of human life.»
The problem
of man is how to love the One on whom he is completely, absolutely dependent; who is the
Mystery behind the mystery of human existence in the fatefulness of its selfhood, of being this man among these men, in this time and all time, in the thus and so - ness of the strange actual
Mystery behind the
mystery of human existence in the fatefulness of its selfhood, of being this man among these men, in this time and all time, in the thus and so - ness of the strange actual
mystery of human
existence in the fatefulness
of its selfhood,
of being this man among these men,
in this time and all time,
in the thus and so - ness
of the strange actual world.
If we are not bored by the message
of the incarnation as it is presented to us
in helpless words from the pulpit, but meet it with a longing heart hoping to confront the ultimate question
of existence, then we shall be able to celebrate the feast
of the advent
of the Son
in which the
mystery we call God (often imagining that this word has explained the
mystery) is truly protectively near, on earth and
in the flesh where we are.
The
Mystery of Mind arises
in all forms
of existence, everywhere at once.
The
mystery of God's love and promise is always, ontologically speaking, fully present to the world, but
in terms
of our historical
existence, it takes on the character
of surprise and unpredictability.)
The constant presence
of this
mystery to the world and to human
existence is equivalent to what the Christian theological tradition has variously called original, universal, natural or general revelation, which it distinguishes from the special or decisive revelation given
in Christ.
In our human awareness
of the
mystery that enshrouds our
existence, there is already a manifestation
of God's being that we may appropriately call by the name «revelation.»
If they are taken as completely timeless —
in the sense
of being immune to the conditional character
of historical
existence — they then become idols themselves instead
of pointers to the
mystery that transcends history and culture.
For them, the approach to sacred
mystery is inseparable from a transformative praxis
in the world
of political, social, and economic
existence.
In faith's response to its kenotic image
of God there lies a surprising way
of bringing new meaning to our normally confused sense
of mystery, to our puzzlement about evolution and other recent discoveries about the physical universe, to our perplexity at the broken state
of social
existence, and finally to our own individual longings and sufferings.
The realms
of mystery, nature, history, and personal
existence can take on deeper coherence and significance as we view them
in the light
of the vulnerability
of God.
Informed by contemporary experience
of the apparent eclipse
of mystery, by the sorrow and oppression
in much social
existence, by the horrors
of genocide, and by the modern threat
of meaninglessness to the individual's
existence, we now seem to be noticing more explicitly than ever before the image
of God's self - emptying, or kenosis, that has always been present
in Christian tradition.
The deepest
mystery of love is not simply the power
of self - denial but the capacity
in every love to learn self - giving and thus within the vital impulses
of creaturely
existence to prepare for the claim
of God upon the spirit.
Percy conveys the postmodern, post-Christian Tupperware partygoer's disappointment
in the randomness
of a world «lacking
mystery and substance» as he employs a playful literary technique involving human «looniness» to explore the dilemma
of man's uncertainty about the nature
of existence.
Kennedy is the same justice who gave out
in Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) that «At the heart
of liberty, is the right to define one's own concept
of existence,
of meaning,
of the universe, and
of the
mystery of human life.»
Religions require for the sake
of religious authenticity that our lives not be embedded too comfortably
in any domain short
of the inexhaustible
mystery that is the ultimate goal and horizon
of our
existence.
«The belief that the soul continues its
existence after the dissolution
of the body is... nowhere expressly taught
in Holy Scripture... The belief
in the immortality
of the soul came to the Jews from contact with Greek thought and chiefly through the philosophy
of Plato its principle exponent, who was led to it, through Orphic and Eleusinian
mysteries in which Babylonian and Egyptian views were strangely blended» (The Jewish Encyclopedia, article, «Immortality
of the Soul»).
As to their presuming to set their destination, surely the editors can not complain about that, since they so strongly agree with the Supreme Court dictum
in Casey that there is no higher truth than «the right to define one's own concept
of existence,
of meaning,
of the universe, and
of the
mystery of human life.»
And the question
of God, thus understood, is one that is ineradicably present
in the
mystery of existence itself, or
of consciousness, or
of truth, goodness, and beauty.
Because it constantly portrays
mystery in the form
of a gracious promise, the Bible forbids our searching for meaning, salvation, or fulfillment completely apart from historical
existence.
Catholicism presumes,
in effect, that modern efforts to find a genuinely universal mode
of social
existence are legitimate, but argues that the Church
in her grace and
mystery is capable
of doing what they have failed to accomplish.
In «placing myself at the other's service, even to the point
of self - denial,» is «a dynamism that refers beyond the self; it is the experience
of a good that leads to being drawn out and finding oneself before the
mystery that encompasses the whole
of existence.»
If Christians truly believe the ineffable»
mystery of God» took on human flesh, became the definitive translation» living Word»
of this
mystery so beyond us, yet present to us
in the living Word and» translation»
of Jesus Christ, then our knowing or not knowing is never an endless seeking, but a finding not exhausted
of its meaning during our time
of earthly
existence.
Judge Miner, writing for the majority
in the Second Circuit, asked: «What concern prompts the state to interfere with a mentally competent patient's «right to define [his] own concept
of existence,
of meaning,
of the universe, and
of the
mystery of human life,» when the patient seeks to have drugs prescribed to end life during the final stages
of a terminal illness?»
The philosophical concept
of emergence,» for example, can be employed to illuminate what theology has sought to witness to
in its talk about «revelation,» namely, «what it means to have an innovating
mystery break forth from a given structure
of existence» (FFS 133).
It took the Supreme Court a mere twenty - five years to make this premise explicit,
in the famous «
Mystery Passage» of the 1992 Casey decision: «At the heart of liberty is the right to define one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life.
Mystery Passage»
of the 1992 Casey decision: «At the heart
of liberty is the right to define one's own concept
of existence,
of meaning,
of the universe, and
of the
mystery of human life.
mystery of human life.»
The promising
mystery holds out a new vision
of creation's possibilities and thereby sabotages our instincts for securing our
existence only
in the predictability
of natural recurrences.
What can the Christian belief
in «special revelation» possibly mean when it is articulated
in terms
of the penumbra
of mystery that constitutes the widest context
of our
existence and which is testified to universally
in human religious experience and symbolism?
Maritain read all
of history
in the light
of this
mystery — including,
in his later writings, the
existence of the new state
of Israel.
The battle cry is this war was notoriously formulated by Justice Kennedy
in the Casey decision upholding the abortion license
in America: «At the heart
of liberty is the right to define one's own concept
of existence,
of meaning,
of the universe, and
of the
mystery of human life.»
Let us consider antiquity: Did not the Greeks know about Chiron, the wise centaur, who instructed Achilles
in playing the lyre; who introduced the mortal son
of the immortal gods to the knowledge
of the
mysteries, guiding him out
of the darkness
of the Dionysian natural
existence into the Apollonian kingdom
of light; who showed him the way
of transitoriness to immortal
existence, himself a delivered deliverer?