Again morals aren't derived from the «opinion» of any member of
the mystical body of the church except for its head, God.
But in
the mystical body of the Church, the surplus humanity that Christ finds in each of the members of this his body is called upon, insofar as each is a part of the whole, to participate in the work of this body, which is the redemption continued throughout time.
Not exact matches
Catholics hold that the
Church is the
body of Christ, a sacramental and
mystical communion in which Christ is truly and effectually present and through which his justifying and sanctifying grace is mediated.
Morals aren't decided by the members
of the
church, which is the
mystical body of Christ that you are correct in stating but wrong in stating «too bad you never learned about.».
In spite
of the vicissitudes
of human history the developing sequence
of events that constitute the history
of the
Church as the
Mystical Body of Christ is simply non-negotiable.
Jesus Christ is the
mystical head
of the
church body in which all people are united to him.
This contributed towards the
Church's deeper understanding
of her own mystery and particularly to the development
of the theology
of the
Mystical Body through theologians likeHenri de Lubac and Pope Pius XII.
Yet our lives and our actions are given real merit in God's eyes if we are joined to His Son through the sacramental bonds
of the
Church, which is, through these same bonds which we traditionally call «
mystical», the fuller
Body of His Incarnation.
Religious language is also historical and evolutionary: it depicts the people
of God as on a journey to the holy land, the
Church as a
mystical body evolving toward the fullness
of Christ, the liturgy as consisting
of cycles
of growth, the Christian life as an exodus, grace as growth in the fullness
of Christ, dogma as evolving, etc..
Modern ecclesiology, sanctioned by Vatican II, does not start its description
of the nature
of the
Church, like Bellarmin, with its social organization, but with the people
of God, the
mystical Body of Christ, primarily constituted by the unity
of the justified in the Holy Spirit, the community
of the redeemed, as distinct from their organization in a «society».
Jesus in the scriptures speaks many times
of His Bride but His Bride is not human but is the Holy Catholic
Church (The New Jerusalem) who is the
mystical body of Christ.
In the 1943 encyclical Mystici Corporis Christi (On the
Mystical Body of Christ), Pius XII addressed the meaning
of membership in the
Church, but, as Cardinal Dulles writes, Vatican II took a somewhat different approach.
To persecute the house
of Israel is to persecute Christ, not in his
mystical body as when the
Church is persecuted, but in his fleshly lineage and in his forgetful people whom he ceaselessly loves and calls.
Now the dualistic sin
of the Christian
church, its original heresy, is that
of resurrecting Jesus into the heavens with God in glory and the designation
of the
church as Christ's
mystical body on earth.15 In actuality this doctrinal pronouncement represents a reversal
of God's kenotic movement into humanity in Christ's flesh and in his death, for contrary to the spirit
of kenotic incarnation, the
church has become ever more sacredly apart from the profane, and the resurrected Savior ever more transcendent
of the world.
The identity
of the local
church is, in turn, strengthened by an awareness
of sharing in larger circles
of identity — the denomination, other branches
of the
mystical Body of Christ, and in the largest circle — the family
of God.
Walls attributes to this document the teaching that «the
Mystical Body of Christ, which although the same entity as the visible
Church in which it subsists is nonetheless to be distinguished from theChurch «constituted and organised as a society in the present world»».
She is the
Mystical Body of Christ; at the same time a visible society instituted with hierarchical organs, and a spiritual community; the
Church on earth, the pilgrim People
of God here below, and the
Church filled with heavenly blessings; the germ and the first fruits
of the Kingdom
of God, through which the work and the sufferings
of Redemption are continued throughout human history, and which looks for its perfect accomplishment beyond time in glory.
We Catholics believe that the Catholic
Church («Roman», if you wish) is, as Pius XII puts it: the «true
Church of Christ», His «
Mystical Body».
Lumen gentium teaches that «Christ... has founded... his Holy
Church»; «has made her visible framework... the dispenser
of grace and truth»; «she is a society equipped with hierarchical organs and the
Mystical Body of Christ, a visible assembly and a spiritual fellowship»; «we must not think
of the
Church as two substances, but a single, complex reality, the compound
of a human and a divine element» (n. 8).
If, on the other hand, it is «distinguished» from the «
Mystical Body of Christ» how can the latter be «the same entity as the visible
Church»?
Even if it is held that Christ's true
church, «the
mystical Body of Christ,» is sinless, there is no existing, visible
church of which this can be said.
The
Church is the
Mystical Body of Christ — the
Church Christ began and remains with and within.
Later the theme
of the
Mystical Body was stressed, integrating previous concepts
of Church.
The sense
of «churchly appurtenance,» in von Hügel's phase, is something we must cultivate these days, to help our people recognize that in and through the parish
of St. Vitus, Smithville, the very glory
of the
mystical Body of Christ shines forth, «the holy
Church throughout all the world» is reflected, and Christ is present still as we offer ourselves, m union with His perfect Sacrifice, in the eucharistic memorial
of the passion and death
of our Head.
And Christ's
mystical Body, which is the Church — His social body, if I might put it so — is the way in which the work of health - giving, whole - making, or Salvation, is carried on through the a
Body, which is the
Church — His social
body, if I might put it so — is the way in which the work of health - giving, whole - making, or Salvation, is carried on through the a
body, if I might put it so — is the way in which the work
of health - giving, whole - making, or Salvation, is carried on through the ages.
I was taken aback to read Richard John Neuhaus» comments (While We're At It, December 1999) on my April 1999 article in Commentary and my response to Eugene Fisher in the letters section
of the same journal (June / July) concerning the distinction between the
Church as a human institution and as «the
Mystical Body of Christ.»
We shall see presently the place
of our Lord Jesus Christ in this whole context, the utter necessity
of the
Church as the
mystical Body of Christ, and the inescapable reality of «the resurrection of the body, and the life of the world to come.&ra
Body of Christ, and the inescapable reality
of «the resurrection
of the
body, and the life of the world to come.&ra
body, and the life
of the world to come.»
Once you understand this, all
of a sudden the
Church becomes not so much a «fascist» institution, but rather a real,
mystical and physical
Body through which Christ and each one
of us can become lovers.
As a Catholic I believe all believers are a part
of the
mystical body of Christ, the
Church, and you shouldn't separate yourself from that.
The
Mystical Body paradigm, much in favor under Pius XII, makes it all but impossible to give any ecclesial status to non-Catholics and leads to a false identification
of the
Church with Christ her Lord.»
Vatican II by no means rejected the image
of Body of Christ, or
Mystical Body, but it subordinated all the images, including «People
of God,» to the theological concept
of the
Church as sacrament, which Karl Rahner called the Grundidee
of Vatican II's ecclesiology.
In a booklet published during Vatican II, Joseph Ratzinger wrote that the notion
of the
Mystical Body, as expounded in Pius XII's encyclical
of 1943, «made it all but impossible to give any status to Christians separated from Rome» and that it «easily led to a false identification
of the
Church with Christ.»
This would impose categories
of power and authority drawn from the sphere
of earthly politics upon the
Church, which is the
mystical body of Christ.
Rather, we find ourselves expanded by the gaze
of the other within, in whose reflection (as in a mirror) we see all others also with the same eyes in whose loving gaze the many are being drawn into the one: the
mystical body of Christ that is the
Church.
This mundane political usage was mirrored by the Christian community which began to signify ecclesiastical dignitaries by the term, and then also all those Christians with standing in the community
of the
Church, and finally, all individual members
of the
Mystical Body of Christ.
She has made the Gospel shine appealingly in our time; she had the mission
of making the
Church, the
Mystical Body of Christ, known and loved; she helped to heal souls
of the rigours and fears
of Jansenism, which tended to stress God's justice rather than his divine mercy.
«The
Church can not therefore be understood as the
mystical body of Christ, as the sign
of man's covenant with God in Christ, or as the universal sacrament
of salvation unless we keep in mind the «great mystery» involved in the creation
of man as male and female and the vocation to conjugal love, to fatherhood and to motherhood.»
She has made the Gospel shine appealingly in our time; she had the mission
of making the
Church, the
Mystical Body of Christ, known and loved; she helped to heal souls
of the rigours and fears
of...