Sentences with phrase «n't about big issues»

This is a political drama that isn't about big issues, but about matters of trust, fidelity, and the perniciousness of rumor.

Not exact matches

Even apart from the fact that they don't know what they're talking about because they don't know what's out there, the bigger issues are that: (a) almost all of these reports come back with a variety of related findings that may be precisely on point; and (b) the very age of the prior research may be invaluable if the new questions and inquiries have to do with trend lines, changes in attitudes or different behaviors.

And use tangential issues as opportunities for misdirection: By making a big deal about issues you don't really care about, you can concede them later at no real cost.

It's not just about having one issue fixed, like establishing better parental leave policies or solving for the wage gap, it's addressing all of these small things that add up to a bigger problem.

The bigger issue is that Facebook had known about the data leak as early as two years ago, but did nothing to inform its users — because the violation was not a «breach» of Facebook's security protocols.

Although he's got his work cut out for him, he took time out during his first week back on the job to talk not only about big - picture industry issues, but what he did with his personal time in recent months when he was barred from working for Zillow.

One issue is that although many of the big institutions are curious about how bitcoin's underlying blockchain technology could revolutionize the financial sector, bitcoin isn't widely accepted as currency and has no intrinsic value.

It's a very serious issue for the markets, but it's really one that no one is talking about taking to the mat, so probably not a big concern there.

I know nothing is guaranteed but not that long ago JNJ had serious recall issues, MCD about ten years ago traded in the teens, big oil has taken a tumble, etc. etc..

One of the biggest fallouts (to oversimplify) then was that conservatives cared about personal morality and not involvement in social ethics / issues of evil, while liberals cared about social ethics / issues but were seen as lax about morality.

Obviously, abortion is not a big issue to God — not one word about it is mentioned in the entire Bible, or any other holy texts, for that matter.

Further, if Heidegger's reputation for attention to the «big» issues of philosophical anthropology means anything at all, it would also seem to mean that Heidegger's «philosophy of being» can not be distinguished from considerations about how one ought to behave — and a fortiori how Heidegger behaved.

This post is not really about pornography and masturbation, but such things are big issues for many men.

It's not just about rivers and lakes, it's what this decision represents for our treaty partners, and the bigger issues surrounding how the bill is being run through.

It's not perfect and I have some pretty big thoughts about the often over-looked aspect of orphan care that is employment, education, healthcare, attachment issues, and systemic injustice (Bbig thoughts about the often over-looked aspect of orphan care that is employment, education, healthcare, attachment issues, and systemic injustice (BigBig!

Of course, career advancement isn't a big issue for me, but I hate to think what opportunities I could throw away with a careless side remark about the current administration.

It isn't about running a big business and finding answers to political issues in scripture.

Repentance is not as big an issue as the issue of a monstrous God who knows that millions will go to hell for lack of the knowledge of Jesus but does nothing about it.

My last point and Im out... Throughout our great nations history... we always found a way to fight through national issues and come up with solutions... Giving the problems we have now to people in the 50's and 60's... and they may actually come up with a solution... if you earnestly care about making a change... start at the lowest levels of government... go do something... find out costs... expenses... how to get more health care to people... do things like that... quit waiting on the government to provide all the answers... its not the way this country was founded... and not the way we get through problems... If you or ur family does nt have insurance... get a job that can provide you that... instead of hoping the government will do so... If you or ur family lacks access to education... move to an area that excels at it... education is invaluable... Do something about your problem... and quit waiting for the next big lotto...

While I can not speak to all other churches on Sunday mornings, but I have been to a bunch and this «biggest issue» is not worrying about the Islamic or Hindu temple opening up down the block.

Thank you so much for all the research you have shared — hypothyroidism is not seen as a big issue over here, so even though I've never felt any better (I was diagnosed about 10 years ago in my early twenties), my Drs have always just said my results show I am in range, end of story.

This shouldn't be as big of an issue as people are making it out to be, yet it's big enough for someone like me to still be writing about it.

there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark

All I hear my fellow Gunners spew on the Sanchez issue is that «we should let him go (which I agree) because nobody is bigger than Arsenal (which I find hard to believe) because Wenger has shown time & time again that he's bigger than Arsenal for overstaying even when its totally obvious that he delivers no more & even shows the arrogance of coming to say «nothing the fans do get to him & he will only leave in his own choosing» n still gets cheered on & supported by you blinded deluded lots but yet you chumps still come here to make noise about how nobody is bigger than Arsenal....

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Not as many with you as you would probably wished for to be honest.Why would I and the overwhelming majority suddenly go soft on the single biggest issue that has cast itself on this club over the last 5 - 6 seasons?You May well be fed up reading about it but more want him out at whatever cost.

This 50p per seat increase your talking of is peanuts when you consider that every year the seat price goes up on average of about # 2.50 added to the players we sell and all the other revenue that comes in, given that players are an investment in winning trophies and therefor increasing revenue and pushing the brand globally wich again is a huge source of revenue, # 500» 000 is peanuts and the real financial world is not the real football world the two operate in in somewhat different ways regarding this issue and this is why we will never compete with the big boys and win anything of note again.

Jim Harbaugh issued the following quote regarding Jim Delaney on whether or not the Big Ten Commissioner has his back about defending...

Still, it's hard to argue with some of his basic points about the current roster now that they look healthy and international duty shouldn't be as big of an issue:

The separate issue which I won't talk on today was how the whole «we don't sell our players and more» and «we're going to compete for the big names» after the Alexis and Ozil signings that we got the impression from the club on is clearly about as real as my solid platinum flying tractor that I glide to work on every morning.

If you are tensed about the storage area of the stroller, it is not a big issue.

If you haven't given them the skills to make good decisions by the time they are 16, then you probably have bigger things to worry about than just this issue.

Though the big move hasn't come without it's issues — just watch our other videos to find out about those!

I asked the author about this and she swept it aside with something along the lines of: since there was no trend towards improvement, everybody has just decided not to study the issue any more and let all big babies get as big as they want to get because ultrasound is worthless.

The biggest issue most critics have about zero tolerance policies is that they don't work.

I don't think people are really made about any of these topics they bring up because they don't know them to be true (and they are not)- I feel there is a bigger deep - rooted issue here...

If I can't choose a nursing pillow without losing sleep, you can imagine the level of debate that rages when I try to think about bigger issues.

One of my biggest gripes about the media in the age of Twitter and ever - shorter attention spans is that it doesn't lend itself well to an examination of issues in the depth they deserve.

This is becoming a big issue, and people should be way more concerned about whether or not to become involved with coops, legit or not.

Lunch Tray readers come from all over the U.S. (and the world), so I don't want to get too deep into a Houston - specific issue, but then I realized that this correction could be a springboard for a bigger discussion about the future of school food in America.

Every so often DH or I will get all hot and bothered about the eating issue, which is really unproductive, although most of the time I think we handle it OK (that is, by not making a big deal).

There's been a big issue out there in the food blogosphere that I haven't covered on The Lunch Tray, but if your kid (and the rest of your family) drinks organic milk, this is something you need to know about.

People were angry about that but I feel like the bigger issue was doating on a child everytime they cry or want something, not just milk.

«You see what doesn't happen in Washington where we're not talking about the big ticket issues in a bipartisan way,» he said.

This thing am talking about is not a small issue, it is a big issue and am expecting the people who manage her to redirect her focus.

Cuomo: «I have been talking to senators about it, I haven't called specifically about the issue but the issue is a big topic, not just in Rochester but across the state and I've been talking to senators and assemblymen about it.»

When asked about whether the Conservatives should match Labour's «big strides» on increasing women's representation through all - women shortlists, Morgan - in her first comments on the issue since taking on her new job - did not rule the option out.

The candidates talk a lot about job creation and economic development, with Espaillat condemning the growth of so - called big box stores and Walrond promoting infrastructure investment, but there is not a policy issue driving the race.

It hasn't been lost on his administration that Democratic Conference Leader John Sampson has delivered for the mayor on two of the three big issues the mayor cared deeply about: School governance (although that came amid the coup and was very messy) and charter schools.

Saying that he is a «big believer in committees,» Zatz encouraged the reconstituted Town Board to be proactive about breaking itself down into smaller working groups to address specific tasks as needed, and also urged its members old and new not to get bogged down in endless rehashing of issues when consensus is not possible.