Sentences with phrase «n't about dialogue»

Not exact matches

Though he added that Cisco should not influence the geopolitical landscape, «we're happy to have dialogues about how we think it should evolve.»

«We dialogue about what businesses aren't going to be here in the next four or five years, and are we a part of that?

Because endometriosis is so difficult to pin down, it makes it so that there isn't exactly a wealth of dialogue about the condition, which creates confusion.

Even if thousands of baristas are not going to be joining hands with customers to kick down racial barriers, the company has nonetheless started a dialogue about race.

We likely wouldn't be having such a lengthy dialogue about this issue to begin with if it weren't for the ominous student loan debt crisis impacting millennials and their families.

Keep the dialogue open between you and your successor and don't be afraid to ask for feedback about how the transition is progressing from his or her perspective.

The candidate from her party running in Buenos Aires — the country's biggest province — has demurred when asked about the situation in the Venezuela, saying that he did not know «in detail» what was going on there, later stressing the differences between the tenures of Chavez and Maduro and calling for dialogue with a third party, such as the Pope.

As she left the White House, Barra told CNBC the group had a «very constructive dialogue about a wide range of things» but did not say whether any executives disagreed with Trump.

Some advocate goals that do not align with what the American business community wants or what China is prepared to offer, raising questions about how productive a dialogue will be, and whether talks can prevent the world's two largest economies from tipping into a deeper conflict.

Kevin Sandhu, chief executive of Grouplend, said he's had an ongoing dialogue with regulators since getting into the business about a year ago, and he can't see how Lending Loop can pool money from regular, non-accredited investors yet comply with the regulatory interpretation of the business.

Accepting that it was unlikely to develop a meaningful dialogue with most consumers about headache remedies, skin care products, and the like, the health - care - product manufacturer has chosen not to focus its strategies and investments on a Web site alone.

(Notice I didn't say there was NO evidence for evolution because I desire dialogue about it).

On philosophical grounds, this form of accommodationism is inadequate for purposes of dialogue because its portrayal of the other faith (whether by Jews of Christianity or by Christians of Judaism) is one that the other faith — in good faith — can not possibly accept about itself.

I see the problem this way: you are trying to appear superior to anyone who doesn't view evolution as you do while I am trying to learn more about your position through dialogue.

See Fishon, NP is not promoting â $ ˜divisivenessâ $ ™ as is dialogued about in the Romans 16 passage you used as a proof - text â $ «just as I had thought.

The subject is not theological dialogue about how or whether Christianity and Islam teach the love of God and neighbor.

We, and our students, have written not only about God but also about the problem of evil, Christ, the church, Christian education, pastoral counseling, preaching, the nature of human beings, history, liberation and salvation, spirituality, religious diversity, interfaith dialogue, science and religion, and other standard theological topics.

But isn't this what «flat structure» and «communal dialogue and discernment» and a «culture of participation» were supposed to be all about in the first place?

«All the time not having a clue that they were being whispered against, campaigned against by both Catholics & Anglicans who made it palpably clear that this initiative was detrimental to the «dialogue towards unity» and temporarily compromised their positions as oecumenical ambassadors - that this was a counter-productive «wacked - out» scheme by an ailing Pope who merely needed to be placated until he died - hence delaying tactics, obfuscations, procedurality, red tape and making everything as difficult and administratively untenable as possible; with patronising sympathy and hand - wringing at their lot while sneering, dismissing and chuckling to themselves that the whole thing will eventually come to naught... that the administration will crumble via crises and power politics andpersonality clashes and outright frustration at the situation... and ultimately the Ordinariate will be re-integrated into the Conference system and those not happy about it will crawl back to their friends in the C of E.

But, he continued, it is not clear that Jews need an ongoing dialogue with or about Christians in the way that Christians seem to need to come to grips with Jews and Judaism.

«So it gave us an opportunity to talk about their conviction and why they don't eat pork and what that means, and it really opened up some great opportunities of dialogue and conversation — just really over cuisine — all of us sitting down and talking about what our beliefs are.»

Far from being a text which tells people not to talk back to God, Exodus 33:19 is a text which invites people to enter into genuine dialogue with God about His character, actions, and behavior.

The purpose in entering a dialogue with atheists is not to convert them or prove them wrong about the existence of God.

The little dialogue raises some points worth considering, not about the science, though Taylor can't resist the usual demeaning smear of dissenting scientists as «the small vociferous minority.»

The Mennonite - Catholic dialogue, which held its first session in Strasbourg October 14 - 17, 1998, would probably not have been possible without it, so strongly do twentieth - century Mennonites feel about the persecution of their founders by the Inquisition in the sixteenth century.

Dialogue means that, wherever you are, I am attempting to understand your situation and how you see it, but also that I too stand somewhere and am not the Great Stone Face; and that, with all my attempts to be empathetic about your situation, I have the key to a treasure which, in strange and surprising ways that I can not fathom, may help you.

After seeing the news it aroused intense dialogue between me and my roommate (she is not Christian) about what this means for Christianity.

No, what American Catholics are happy about, or should be, is that the pope is bringing Christianity into the dialogue with secularism in a way that doesn't alienate the people he would like to introduce to Christ via grace and mercy AND that he is doing so while maintaining the firm teachings the Church holds on moral matters.

Because he has earned the respect of religious leaders on just about all sides, Canon White has been able to promote dialogue and mutual understanding in a region where the best efforts of our most skilled diplomats have not met with success.

Physics - lite @ CN77 & Andrew Andrew's Quote «It's not all that pointless, see while you would never be convinced that your bronze age mythological beliefs about the creation of the universe are wrong, since I can rebut (with peer reviewed journal articles no less) any claim you make, in rather stunning detail, those who are not so well versed on the subject who read the dialogue could be swayed to the side of science.

A good example is Habakkuk's presentation of a dialogue between the prophet and God — the prophet's first complaint is against the sins of Judean society and God explains that he will be using the evils of the invading Chaldeans to punish Judea; the prophet responds by complaining about the evils of the Chaldeans which God then assures will not go unpunished — that they tyranny itself will lead to it's own punishments and that the punishment for Judea's sins is itself redemptive and God assures that he will be able to provide salvation.

For — if all the signs do not deceive — the talk about dialogue takes from men the living experience of dialogical life....

On the other hand, if they think prayer is a dialogue with God, they're often not sure what it means to have God respond - and they are uneasy with people who speak confidently about what God has revealed to them.

For this dialogue to be real, one must not only mean the other, but also bring oneself, and that means say at times what one really thinks about the matter in question.

Unveiling a new work on the Second Vatican Council in Rome, Cardinal Walter Brandmuller, the retired president of the Pontifical Committee for Historical Sciences, announced that Vatican II's decrees on non-Christian religions (Nostra Aetate) and Religious Freedom (Dignitatas Humanae) «do not have a binding doctrinal content, so one can dialogue about them.»

«A lot of times in church we don't want to talk about those kinds of things because it's uncomfortable, but there are so many people in church who need to have that dialogue with God that I had.

«We like having dialogues about spirituality, but we get distracted by conversations of Sharia, of jihad, of apostasy and the conversation becomes more about this is what Islam is not, as opposed to a proactive conversation about real Islam.»

The only other commentary I have seen is where Richard Mouw, President of Fuller Seminary, explained that Mormonism is not a cult and shared some things about the evangelical / Mormon dialogue.

Instead of using the approach he had used on the Areopagus, he focused entirely on preaching about Christ crucified (1 Corinthians 1:23, 2:2)-- a topic that he did not mention at all in his dialogue with the philosophers as it is recorded in the Book of Acts.

While it is fine, indeed healthy, for Judaic scholars to engage in a heated exchange about the best way to approach interfaith dialogue, nothing can justify Prof. Novak's truly repugnant accusation that, in not ascribing to Dabru Emet, Prof. Levenson is somehow guilty of fostering «self - hatred» among Christians, or his insulting suggestion that Levenson would be better off teaching in an Orthodox yeshiva than at Harvard.

In addition, Mark 11.23 has a saying, «Whoever says to this mountain «Be taken up and cast into the sea», and does not doubt... but believes... it will be done for him», set in the context of the dialogue about the meaning of the withered fig tree, and in this he is followed by Matthew (21.21).

Before going on to speak of the convergence that exists on this point between the present General Secretary of the World Council of Churches and the Encyclical Ut unum sint, I must first take the further step of showing that the suggestion about dialogue and reception as phases of a conciliar process has not come out of the blue.

Even if his statements about faith don't measure up to a traditional Christian standard, the fact that Kanye is making them should be seen as an opportunity to talk about real biblical truth in honest ways and be a part of the cultural dialogue.

On the basis of this position, it becomes possible to come into dialogue with other positions, not just to learn what these disciplines tell us about the inauthenticity of the world, but also to learn a word of «revelation,» that is, a word of truth about God.

Theologians such as Joseph C. Hough have since insisted that the congregation needs to be analyzed «in the light of the universal theological dialogue in the church about the mission and ministry of the church as the body of Christ in the world» (in Dudley, Building Effective Ministry, 112), but most theological studies of the church since 1970 do not analyze the local church.

Christians to a dialogue about his office certainly does not intend to exclude Catholics from this dialogue.

I express a worry about it in Dialogue 4, but on the whole the participants were not concerned with this particular problem, which belongs to the later Whitehead.

Johnson, editor of The Conviction of Things Not Seen: Worship and Ministry in the 21st Century and coauthor of Performing the Sacred: Theology and Theatre in Dialogue, also develops apps and software to teach students about the intersection of theology and the art of worship.

Second, it is a dialogue of mutual confrontation, correction and new direction among the participants who bring it not only different but often conflicting analyses of the world, engagement in social action, and convictions about the work of God.

WHERE IS THE LOVE OF GOD IN ALL THIS??? This is an open forum, an invitation to debate... it isn't a place for name calling, or put downs... it isn't a place for closed mindedness... its a place to exchange ideas, and perhaps to come to a greater understanding of scripture and one another and when someone puts someone down or is dogmatic about another's beliefs it prevents dialogue.