Sentences with phrase «n't about monetary policy»

This piece isn't about monetary policy.

Not exact matches

First the line about «it shows how unreliable interest rates can be as an indicator of appropriate monetary policy» means that low interest rates do not necessarily mean loose policy.

«If it's described as an attack on the economy, it suggests that there's not a discussion about what might need to change in terms of monetary and fiscal policy,» he said.

Yellen won't take questions after she speaks at the Boston Fed this morning, but traders will be looking for any clues in her speech about her thinking on monetary policy.

Even if his comments were well - informed — which they're not — he shouldn't be speaking publicly about his views on how monetary policy should be conducted.

«The preferred solution, in the opinion of many of these countries, is for the United States to internalize the effects of its monetary policies — more specifically, not to exit or at least to do so at a time that is more convenient for others,» Deputy Bank of Canada Governor John Murray recently said in prepared remarks for a speech about the likely effects of the end of QE.

So it seems to me the risk of the economy hitting the recession when monetary policy is not in a position to respond are much greater than they have been previously and therefore, we need to be very cautious about doing anything that would increase those risks.

If, as I have indicated, the U.S. growth and inflation outlooks have not changed notably, then why have expectations about U.S. monetary policy shifted so much?

The relationship between monetary policy and financial stability may depend on the specific economic conditions in which we find ourselves.6 Moreover, the processes resulting in financial cycles, with periods of unsustainable debt buildup, occasional crises and periods of deleveraging, are not well captured by standard models.7 We have more work to do before we can be fully confident about our conclusions.

Even recent Fed cuts don't rule it out, because historically, sequential easings of monetary policy have occurred at an average S&P 500 P / E of about 11, not the current level of 27.

At a press conference Thursday afternoon, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke fielded a number of questions from reporters about the open - ended nature of monetary easing, saying, «We're not going to be premature in removing policy accommodation... We're going to give it some time to make the sure the recovery is well established.»

With it looking increasingly likely that Larry Summers will be the next Fed chairman, there's been a lot of concern that he hasn't said all that much about monetary policy, and what he has said has sounded a bit hawkish.

When it comes to thinking about what could be done, it's important to remember that monetary policy isn't the only game in town.

If growth can not be boosted by monetary policy, and fiscal policy is «in the hands of a plutocracy more concerned about immediate profits as opposed to long - term vitality, then no Genie or Flavor Flav with a magic clock can make a difference.»

The speech was not critical about recent Japanese monetary moves, which infers that the FED is very comfortable with current BOJ policy.

I don't know if I can make the same type of observation about silver being sensitive to monetary policy; silver seems to be more sensitive to gold action and industrial activity.

He breaks down the role of monetary and fiscal policy in generating growth, and what investors need to think about when such policies aren't delivering it.

Yet this isn't the first time in the present campaign that the Conservatives themselves have trespassed on traditional Bank of Canada terrain. On July 22 Joe Oliver publicly rejected the use of quantitative easing in Canada (the unconventional credit - expanding strategy that has been used successfully in the US, the UK, and now Europe) despite dimming economic projections here. Decisions about the use of QE should, in theory, be the purview of the central bank. Several economists publicly questioned Oliver's statement, noting that it throws into question the Bank's future decisions on monetary policy.

Courts have made clear for eighty years that they will not review the Fed's decision about monetary policy, including when those decisions require novel interpretations of law.

We went from «Don't fight the FEDs, don't fight Central Banks» to «who cares about Central Banks» because everything is fine in the economy and there is disbelief that we're making the transition from a reliance on monetary policy to the benefits of a fiscal policy and synchronized growth.

In our globalized and technocratic age, we're often told, «we need expert management of monetary, trade, and tax policy, not collective deliberation about how, as a society, we are to order our common life.»

It was felt that Ministerial control over interest rates was not conducive to long - term economic stability, as multiple political factors had long clouded economic judgments about what monetary policy should be used for.

Brown comes back strong, responding to a Cameron joke about him not knowing the difference between fiscal and monetary policy with some glib headmasterly tones and a couple of counter-accusations.

There is a debate about the future of monetary policy, not in the UK exclusively but in many, many countries... There is a debate going on.

But I am not the only one concerned about monetary policy.

In conclusion, I do not believe you can accurately state whether gold is undervalued or overvalued - you must make judgments based on what you think about the future of the market and of monetary policy, but there are too many variables to be accurate consistently.

«I think there's a sense that monetary policy can't have as big an impact as it could have had a decade ago,» he said, «meaning we are going to have to think about fiscal measures that can make a difference.»

The Fed is saying, «You may worry about the fiscal cliff, the crisis in Europe and slowing China, but don't worry about monetary policy.

Yes, the credit policies of other nations were a factor, but it does not excuse the mismanagement of monetary policy by Greenspan, where private and public debts were allowed to build up to record high ratios of GDP, threatening the health of the financial system, and the Fed did little to nothing about it.

Moreover, Jordan said that «The SNB isn't thinking about changing its monetary policy,» adding that «It wouldn't be a good idea now to tighten monetary conditions.»

And all the more so, given that the Swissy was out of commission as a safe - haven at the time, apparently because SNB Boss - Man Thomas Jordan was cited in a Bloomberg report as saying that even though there was «a certain decline in the franc's overvaluation, the franc remains highly valued» and that «The situation on foreign - exchange markets remains fragile,» which is why the «The SNB isn't thinking about changing its monetary policy» and will continue with its negative rates and its policy of intervening (* cough * currency manipulation * cough *) in the forex market.

but the Loonie's price action was like chop suey or a mixed bag of nuts, likely because Wilkins didn't really talk about the Loonie or monetary policy, expressing only some concern about the levels of household debt (which is not really new).

I'm not talking about marginal tax rates, or monetary policy, which offer transitory relief, but changes in regulations.

They do not meet the standard of timing, but that is because the pace of temperature change depends on development, growth, and policy decisions about climate and other things that can not be predicted (but that does not stop the Federal Reserve from setting monetary policy).