Sentences with phrase «n't about morality»

This Hobby Lobby case isn't about morality like conservatives would have us believe.

Even you «moral discourse» types are talking about how we talk about morality - not about morality itself.»

It's not about morality in the medical profession vs. other professions.

Not exact matches

Religion seems to think that morality can not ever be achieved through any other means than by what some book says about it.

everything you need to know about morality you learned in kindergaten... except for not screwing your neighbor's wife.

That Humanae Vitae and related Catholic teachings about sexual morality are laughingstocks in all the best places is not exactly news.

So why not live how we want to, lets forget about morality and being Godly.

We can also think about morality more clearly because we are not saddled with the faith process, where you do what you are told without thinking for yourself.

In short, you missed my whole point, which was that morality is not the only purpose for faith and, perhaps, not even the most important thing about faith.

Regardless, my initial sentence is about the discussion on morality, where you started again from scratch with on atheism as if we hadn't been discussing anything for the past hour or so.

It would seem you are making stuff up about people you do not understand... is that your christian «morality» again?

Some people talk about morality like if it weren't for Christianity there would be no morals.

Apparently, this absolute morality argument isn't about whether something is «good» or «bad» or causes pain or suffering, it's about abdicating any personal responsibility in making such a decision.

That is about sexual morality, not sexual orientation.

We may have no beliefs in common about God, Bible, and Christian morality, but what's a church for if we can't still have a good time together?

Morality is about figuring out the best course of action when there may not be an easy answer.

One of the biggest fallouts (to oversimplify) then was that conservatives cared about personal morality and not involvement in social ethics / issues of evil, while liberals cared about social ethics / issues but were seen as lax about morality.

You always see at least two sides to everything, and you don't take a strong stand unless it's about something that involves integrity or morality.

The Bible doesn't record any instance where someone asked Jesus about the morality of a subprime loan or the best way to reduce the deficit.

We will not... bend to any rule purporting to force us to bless immoral sexual partnerships, treat them as marriages or the equivalent, or refrain from proclaiming the truth, as we know it, about morality and immorality and marriage and the family.

BTW I asked you a question about morality and why anything that doesn't cause needless harm to another should be considered immoral.

Oh, the Calvinists could make perfect sense of it all with a wave of a hand and a swift, confident explanation about how Zarmina had been born in sin and likely predestined to spend eternity in hell to the glory of an angry God (they called her a «vessel of destruction»); about how I should just be thankful to be spared the same fate since it's what I deserve anyway; about how the Asian tsunami was just another one of God's temper tantrums sent to remind us all of His rage at our sin; about how I need not worry because «there is not one maverick molecule in the universe» so every hurricane, every earthquake, every war, every execution, every transaction in the slave trade, every rape of a child is part of God's sovereign plan, even God's idea; about how my objections to this paradigm represented unrepentant pride and a capitulation to humanism that placed too much inherent value on my fellow human beings; about how my intuitive sense of love and morality and right and wrong is so corrupted by my sin nature I can not trust it.

Oh John, you profess god's love from one side of your face while hating atheists from the other and then go so far as to question the morality and credibility of people you don't even know and know even less about.

Don't you think a minister, people who spend their whole lives thinking about ethics and morality, have something worthwhile to say on it?

They have questions they are desperate to ask their church leaders or friends, but somehow feel they can't; questions about its reliability, its nature and its morality especially around episodes such as those where God ordered the Israelites to obliterate their enemies.

For Whitehead, this importance is not limited to issues of human morality, although he is keenly concerned about these.

The problem may not be with rights per se, whose articulation is invaluable to our conception of modern republicanism (and may even help more fully articulate what is true about Christian morality), but with an interpretation that takes rights as the whole of moral discourse and therefore, understands the abstract Lockean individual to be a comprehensive account of the human person.

This poll indicates that strong majorities of both Evangelical Christians and Roman Catholics do not often hear about morality policy issues from clergy.

It is not merely about the balance between pastoralism and doctrine, but about the entitlement of the Church to speak of morality at all.

For all of their ingenuity and their (perhaps considerable) merits, in other words, these accounts seem not to be talking about the same sort of thing that we have all along understood «morality» to be (or that we encounter when we feel ourselves subject to «moral» constraints).

With Michael Walzer, he would probably place it under the heading of a «culturally differentiated morality,» about which «consensus is not necessary.»

once you concede that racism or any other major immorality could be deemed acceptable in the future, you are not talking about an objective basis for morality — because it changes.

The genius of Rand is not about how to run your lives (that's what morality is for).

Morality isn't just about WHAT is right and wrong... it is also about WHY it is right and wrong and «because I said so» does not answer that issue.

The question wasn't about historical facts, it was about whether or not objective morality actually exists.

Pope Francis is not about ending Capitalism, but urging regulation and morality, specifically protection and relief for the poor.

«Very rarely,» he continued, «did Jesus ever talk about morality or social issues... Often, people want to talk about behavior modification, and our church isn't about that... We're about soul transformation.»

Before you say another word, think for a minute about how members of your faith continuously push for legislation to force others to your way of life, force your morality, spark witch hunts for radicalized members of other religions even though it's more often than not white guys gunning down crowds in schools, theatres, grocery store parking lots, etc..

We're not at liberty to change what the Bible says about the morality of gay sex.

Her thinking never toouches the real world, and that is a problem when the subject is morality, which is what you actually do, not some abstract concept you think about.

While there is such a thing as Christian morality, Christianity is not primarily an ethical framework, but rather it is about participating in the life of the Trinity.

We have come to understand that morality is about consideration for othersm not about rigidly following a set of rules.

Unfortunately it doesn't espouse the same crap morality of Atlas Shrugged, so I guess we'll not be talking about it.

They are not only getting a * far * better academic education, they are also getting a far better moral education than can be had in a public school, where morality may not even be mentioned and there is little or no talk about ethics, either.

She's not being delusional — she's engaging in an imaginative exercise in order to express her own feelings and morality about her son.

Traditionalists who like to see morality as a series of rules with messages about bending one's will creakingly into line with stern teachings will not like this book very much — or, rather, they will like it, and they will know it makes sense, but they will try very hard to dislike it because it presents the Catholic and incarnational message in a John Paul II sort of way.

An image concerning sexual morality is not just about the moral value of chastity in itself.

-LCB- No they didn't: only the atheist coalition was going on about his views on sexual morality Maybe Longley was, who knows?

Fourth, Matthew presents temptation not as a private morality game but as a contest about the shape and nature of ministry.

(2) A plurality of responsible views are held in our society about the morality of abortion, and the state should not force everyone to live by the standards of one segment of society.