Sentences with phrase «n't accept that answer»

When they don't accept an answer that doesn't parrot their belief, they accuse others of twisting and shouting aka doing the chubby checker.

But science does not accept an answer without evidence for the comfort of having an answer, like creationism does.

At least Moby said «I don't know, no one know's» while I don't accept his answer, I'll respectfully agree to disagree.

I can not accept the answer of the atheists who say that there is no God to speak about.

People told Kim it was impossible and she didn't accept the answer, so she left her job and started her own R&D company to find out.

I've tried to explain to him that we don't always have dessert, but he just doesn't accept that answer.

I am not accepting the answer till then.

Do not accept the answer «everyone was down» any more than you'd accept «everyone cheats.»

Don't accept an answer that both of the dog's parents had good hips so we did not need to check them.

Perhaps their boss in the Air Force won't accept the answer that «Lieutenant Jones is an expert at runways and bombs and he estimates it will take 10 bombs to disable this runway», so they come up with their poor model, and then adjust its results until it agrees with Lieutenant Jones, and then present it to their boss as, «Our most sophisticated model indicates that it will take 10 bombs + / - 1 bomb to disable this runway.»

Don't accept an answer like «My company pays me.»

Not exact matches

As often as not, the biggest hurdle isn't even coming up with an elegant and cost - effective solution; it's getting people to accept the prospect of change and to adopt your answer to the problem.

Don't blindly accept a candidate's answers.

The most honest answer I can give is that I'm looking for maniacally driven individuals who are obsessive in their pursuit of an idea and who are so competitive and driven that they can't accept failure.

A faster, universally accepted payments system would eliminate the wait that many consumers and businesses face before they can access their money, but it is not the answer to every issue — such as banks charging excessive overdraft fees — and it is unlikely to be available to those who do not have smartphones or bank accounts.

Our basic answer has been to accept credit, but not duration, risk.

Forgive those of us who don't accept you 2 +2 = 5 answer.

I unlike you can accept that there are things that I can't know the answers to at this time, and that perhaps someday we will figure it out.

Religion knows it can't stand up to any sort of rational test, which is why it makes a virtue out of faith — not questioning and accepting whatever answers you're given.

when you all turn into hypocrites is when i get upset... its like black people creating black history month... what if a white person did that... then it would be racist... gay people want to be accepted and not hated on... the answer is not to turn around and hate and attack everyone else... really humans in america are fuct... no way out of it... you have all entangled yourself in a web of hate... grow up

And if we don't have an answer for something then we simply accept that we don't know.

@Nick — Atheists don't think they have all the answers, but they also don't just accept answers that they believe to be made up.

However there are those of us who accept that we can't possibly have all the answers to the atrocities and unknown's in this world.

rea · son — noun / ˈrēzən / a.Think, understand, and form judgments by a process of logic — humans do not reason entirely from facts b.Find an answer to a problem by considering various possible solutions c.Persuade (someone) with rational argument — I tried to reason with her, but without success» I accept nothing on faith» can you prove we evolved from primates or that life started by random chance?

I experience miracles and answered prayer none of which a skeptic will accept nor would I have accepted such accounts prior to that point when the Holy Spirit began to reveal a reality governed by what is not scientifically falsifiable.

Then I understood religion and atheism are alike because religious people when they can't answer something they say it's God's wishes and they followers accept it.

I'm quite content not having all the answers and in being content, I refuse to accept without evidence a god.

Sometimes it is like being an auto mechanic having someone try to convince you their standard gasoline engine only runs on orange juice and will not accept any other answer.

It may not be the cleanest or most satisfying answer to say that we can not fully understand God, so we need to learn to accept it, but it is part of the answer.

But, if you find an answer not deemed «correct» by your religion, and accept it as the truth, then won't you probably find yourself outside of that faith?

I am looking for authenticity, relevancy, no ovewhelming bands that take away from the experience of worship, clergy who are willing to answer my hard questions, who understand doubt is a stepping stone to deepening my belief, who accept everyone as Jesus did (and we know Jesus was a rebel who accepted and led all sorts of people), who don't feel the need to try to be hip, who speak about things without inserting politics, who are wiling to trash the temple to bring us back to the truth, who will step out of the box of comfort and be real.

atheism tells us to ask questions and not just accept archaic answers as absolute truth.

The problem comes with a few folks who still can't accept their assumptions might be wrong even after learning that there's wide consensus on the answer by those who've studied it.

Non-believers see a godless world, walk with the things of man, accept only the proof of man, can not see miracles, can not see answered prayer and basically have only the presence and perspective of Richard Dawkins bible.

The same reasons BC condemns the readers and contributors to this forum — that we think, question, use our own God - given intelligence and reasoning skills, don't accept the easy answers, and are accepting of differences which create no harm — are the very things that make that notion quite bizarre.

One isn't open minded by just accepting answers (believes) because they have been passed on from generation to generation.

But the Palestinians» supported by the major Arab powers» would not take yes for an answer and refused a deal, even a deal that would accept a number of Israeli concessions and leave other matters open for further discussion.

Whether you accept that answer or not, is on you.

I wish some Calvinist would answer why do you accept this belief system just because you believe in the sovereignty of God doesn't mean He doesn't allow things to happen by its own accord

I am using the term «dialectic» in its ancient and etymological sense, and it seems appropriate to describe the process by this word; for instead of an aprioristic, deductive method of procedure, the process was one of answering questions and objections as they arose, not in anticipation, and not as the unfolding, more geometrico, of a system implicit within a body of axioms or first principles which one needed only accept and then all the rest followed logically to the final Q.E.D..

«No Religion» is not accepted as an answer.

Unfortunately, many people seem to have a problem accepting that they shouldn't persecute others based on their subjective answer to an objectively unanswerable question.

I won't discuss any of the topics you have raised, but I will only encourage you to ask questions, challenge every single doctrine, and (as much as is possible) refuse to accept any single side of an issue without investigating other reasonable answers as well.

The fact that you can't or choose not to accept my answer makes me (in your eyes) unable to be taken seriously and seeking an alternative to reality.

These folks don't have questions... they have ANSWERS and they want you accept their answers on...ANSWERS and they want you accept their answers on...answers on... FAITH.

This was not an answer I could accept.

For example --- when I have asked Calvinists to interpret the majority of the Scripture, that reeks with the implication «that man has the inherent ability to accept / believe or reject what is being communicated to them from God» from their «no inherent ability of man to accept / believe or reject» perspective, the usual answer I get is along this line is: «Yes, God communicates with man in a style that implies that man has the inherent ability to accept / believe or reject what is being communicated to them from Him, but God knows that man does not have that inherent ability.»

You can not be a good scientist when you accept mythology as a basis of an answer.

Tom's presence at church has been a test of my faith — the ever - present question mark that has not let me accept easy answers and avoid uncomfortable conversations.

Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,