Sentences with phrase «n't accept that consensus»

Or, if one is a scientist whose research contradicts the consensus, holding all other factors constant, it would be expected that such a research scientist would not accept the consensus.

He had claimed he found 34 abstracts in the scientific mainstream that did not accept the consensus position that humans are causing rapid climate changes.

They want to shut up people that doesn't accept the consensus.

I don't accept that consensus is a necessarily a procedure to protect identity.»

Surveys have shown that 97 percent of peer - reviewed literature and climate scientists accept that human activities are a major factor causing global warming — only 3 percent do not accept this consensus position.

Not exact matches

Asked why the Congressman wasn't prepared to accept the intelligence community's assessment that Russia hacked and leaked the DNC emails, Grubbs replied: «Because over time he's learned that the intel community has not been completely reliable and that its «assessment» of the leaks was more of a subjective consensus than hard evidence.»

Yet, even with yields hovering around 3 % for the first time since 2013, investors should not be so quick to accept the bearish consensus view.

For much of my career I pretty much accepted the consensus, but as I started to think more seriously about the components of the balance of payments, I realized that when Keynes at Bretton Woods argued for a hybrid currency (which he called «bancor») to serve as the global reserve currency, and not the US dollar, he wasn't only expressing his dismay about the transfer of international status from Britain to the US.

This hold was not simply imposed from above but was the result of a new consensus, promoted by church and state but increasingly accepted and advanced by people who saw the advantages of limiting violence.

igaftr The Big Bang is not fact it is only the current accepted consensus.

I have to say I am not a historian or a serious Biblical scholar, so am not in a position to assess — or even be aware of — all the various claims and counter claims, but I'm basically happy to accept this consensus.

The problem comes with a few folks who still can't accept their assumptions might be wrong even after learning that there's wide consensus on the answer by those who've studied it.

The quest for total consensus is an illusion, and indeed there is no reason to accept majority rule in such a matter if the majority does not share one's premises.

By nature, the present President of America has that element in him — I should not be saying this but I am being inherently made to convey this as comment of exception for America and for Obama whose whole (Obama and his better half) stand as an extension through the ex Presidential candidate's Charisma Of the Secretary Hillary Clinton that President Obama's Charisma has selflessly absorbed for function in the cabinet gracefully for America and the world.That shows the humbleness of President Obama and maturity of Hillary Clinton of acceptance without a feeling of high and low of ego regarded as exceptional in Divinity.I was not supposed to make this comment and I have done so to urge the Republicans to accept their Light within of consensus through individual projections under control as Obama's gesture of bipartisanship that will come to address.In short, this comment is all about health and health care where economics alone does not come into the picture with a rigorous analysis on it but should also extend as leverage to the person in play (Obama) who is also selflessly poised with corrections on it over the infra structure of it that he has proposed for approval as ego of his working element as the executive public ally chosen as the President that had appealed to the public at large voting even putting behind able dleaers like McCain?George W Bush was the last to steer America into the Light over the past of America and that stands as the subtle truth even today as on date with Bill Clinton the ex President of America giving support through his excellent independent caliber for Obama ultimately to head the show of America that was time bound of its reality that sees no barriers and to which he accepted well in his individual capacity as the free lance ex President of America.

Many have been ready to accept this consensus of scholarly opinion on the date and authorship of the four Gospels, but have not realized the shattering implications of this concerning the status of the empty tomb story as historical evidence.

By 1980, however, the somewhat chastened magazine acknowledged he was not: «God is making a comeback Most intriguingly, this is happening not among theologians or ordinary believers — most of whom never accepted for a moment that he was in any serious trouble — but in the crisp, intellectual circles of academic philosophers, where the consensus had long banished the Almighty from fruitful discourse.»

this blog is not working with me... I'll have to catch you guys on another post... it will not accept long post... This is my main point against the scientific method argument; it is consensus in the scientific community that most of our Universe is unseen.

We shouldn't HAVE to wonder if our potential leaders accept the scientific consensus on issues, but many of them DO N'T whether in truth or for political reasoN'T whether in truth or for political reasons.

It is surprising to me that it is often the activists who speak up in support of the scientific consensus around climate change (i.e. that there is overwhelming scientific evidence that climate change is induced by humans and is happening), who are the same activists who don't accept the scientific consensus and evidence that shows that GM crops can be safe.

Either you accept scientific consensus or you don't; but, you can not have it both ways, accepting science that agrees with your personal philosophy and rejecting that which does not.

The common consensus has been accepted that football isn't football unless it is played on the ground.

«The consensus is the governor's office did not hold up its end of the agreement when we accepted their request to stand down in return for the release of fiscal information about the planned DOT regional capital program for Long Island after Cuomo's budget release.

«There's an emerging consensus that air pollution also causes new onset asthma, but that's not accepted by everybody,» McConnell said.

Well, yes, most viewers might know what the consensus is, but an awful lot of them do not accept it.

I agree that true skepticism is an integral part of the scientific method — but want to emphasize that it is practiced by those who do accept the consensus, not just by those in opposition.

There is a finely graded inverse association between age and cognitive performance, 3 4 5 but the age at which cognitive decline becomes evident at the population level remains the subject of debate.5 6 7 A recent review of the literature concluded that there was little evidence of cognitive decline before the age of 60.8 This point of view, however, is not universally accepted.5 6 Clinicopathological studies show good correlation between neuropathology and the severity of cognitive decline, 9 10 11 and neurofibrillary tangles and amyloid plaques, the hallmarks of pathology, are known to be present in the brains of young adults.12 13 Emerging consensus on the long gestation period of dementia14 15 also suggests that adults aged under 60 are likely to experience age related cognitive decline.

But Hartmut Michel didn't accept this scientific consensus.

I have looked at Quackwatch and it is quite apparent to me that Stephen Barrett's knowledge base would be in tune with medical and nutrition consensus from 50 years ago.In other words, woefully outdated.To give one example, Dr Robert Lustig's research linking fructose consumption to obesity has been universally accepted by the medical profession and nutritionists.It is quite evident he had not eve heard of such research.

«You can accept consensus, but you can't accept compromise, particularly if compromise yields mediocre results.»

The consensus is that they are not likely to ever become accepted due to the tradition behind the breed's spectacular silver blue color.

And I could not help but notice a theme common to both works: the potential dangers involved in uncritically accepting a widely held consensus view.

But sometimes consensus just means that there is a consensus of skeptics (e.g., Wegener's theory of continental drift was proposed in 1912 based on continent shapes but was not widely accepted until 50 years later because the smoking gun — deep sea rifts — hadn't been discovered) or there is consensus because the data is overwhelming (e.g., descent with modification).

oit is with indignation that we are speaking othis document is not acceptable • Bolivia owe have learned about this document through the media, not through you onow we are given 60 minutes to accept something already agreed upon by other states owe are seeing actions in a dictatorial way othis is unacceptable and anti-democratic owe say to the people of the world: they shall judge upon it othe rights of our people are not being respected owe are not going to decide about so many lives in only 60 minutes othis is s group of a small number of countries oAPPLAUS • Cuba o4 hours ago Obama announced an agreement which is non-existant owe is behaving like an emperor owe have seen version being discussed by secretive groups in the last hours and days oCuba will not accept your draft declaration oat this conference, there is no consensus on this document oI associate my voice to Tuvalu, Venezuela, Bolivia othe target of 2 degrees is unacceptable o... • Costa Rica ofor the reasons that we have heard, this document can not be considered the work of the AWG - LCA and can not be considered by the COP othis can only be an INF doc, it's just for information oadditional question: in an earlier version, a CP.15 - decision, para. 1: there was a reference to a legally binding instrument to be adopted by the COP onow: we have a new version, but the reference to legally binding instrument disappeared • USA o [wants to speak, but point of order by Nicaragua] • Nicaragua othere is already a precedent where we have not been given the right to speech onow that you have mentioned we finally want to speak • Pres. [moving on] oUS does not appear on my list any more, so next one is Sudan • Sudan othere must be something horribly wrong here oI pushed the button when I saw Nicaragua raising their sign in order to support them • Nicaragua othis is a deterioration of the democratic system oand this happens at the most important conference of the UN for many years owe have draft decisions about how to carry forward the process ostates (lists names) have written a submission: • this has not followed the basic principles of the UN • inclusion • bottom up processes • democratic participation • equality of states oduring this consequence, many states expressed their position against such approaches othe only agreement we recognize is??

Those who do not accept the AGW consensus claim that Arctic sea ice is not declining, or at least we have insufficient data to reach such a conclusion.

But he later contacted Guardian Australia to say that he accepts the science of global warming which in his view does not present any consensus that human beings contribute to global warming.

It is also an irrelevant question if we accept, like Nullius does, that science ain't about consensus anyway.

Of course, there's no doubt any more, plate tectonics is accepted by virtually everyone and I wouldn't quibble with anybody saying that the scientific consensus on plate tectonics approaches 100 %.

Consideration of whether or not accident deaths would be most reduced by reducing speed limits is inhibited by accepting the consensus that «speed kills».

The Journal of the American Statistical Association still publishes good papers supporting a skeptical / lukewarmist position (as does the AAAS's Science Magazine), but I expect that the board of the ASA has just raised the bar for accepting studies not supportive of the consensus.

Not doing so makes it part of the accepted consensus.

Since «climate scientists» are not real scientists, they don't realize that Einstein's theorems were only accepted by scientists following the confirmation of certain predictions made by his theorems; that all they have to do to earn a consensus of belief is demonstrate a confirmation of their predictions.

But if we presume that Delingpole is forced by the analogy to accept that he should trust the consensus formed by scientists, we must conclude that science is not under attack.

Obviously it is not tenable to reject the ocean oscillation argument when applied to the solar theory but accept in when applied to CO2, but this is what the consensus scientists are effectively doing.

One aspect not yet discussed is the Kuhnian claim that AGW must be accepted because it is «consensus science».

Wasn't it Svalgaard who said this season would be a disappointment to those who accept the scientific consensus on climate change?

It was clearly intended by Congressman Lamar Smith, who is a climate change denier, he does not accept the overwhelming scientific consensus on human - caused climate change.

If the media implies that there is a scientific consensus on some topic, then many scientists who have not looked at the topic for themselves will just accept that consensus as being valid, without checking for themselves.

Ross McKitrick — May 11, 2015 — Financial Post Not only is there no 97 per cent consensus among climate scientists; many misunderstand core issues In the lead - up to the Paris climate summit, massive activist pressure is on all governments, especially Canada's, to fall in line with the global warming agenda and accept emission targets -LSB-...]

Second, you skipped the Roman warm period, and I am grateful that even the» the climate consensus community» accepts that the «so - called Holocene Climactic Optimum was indeed warmer than both the LIA» What you fail to note is peer review literature supports the MWP, the coolest of the three warm periods, as being as warm as today, and NO, the» the climate consensus community» did not even exist when this was known so they did not inform me of this.

I suspect because probably they know that there is a strong prevalence of agreement among experts that continued and increasing aCO2 emissions pose a potential threat, but they find that «consensus» to be politically inconvenient because they don't want to accept the political associations with accepting that threat, so instead they focus on a red herring of a more politically convenient target of whether expert climate scientists agree that «CAGW» is «settled science»