Sentences with phrase «n't accept the value»

Not exact matches

Code for America co-founder Catherine Bracy fired off a series of tweets saying Silicon Valley should disown Thiel, urging men and women of all races not accept jobs at Facebook until he's off the board, and saying anyone who defends him is sending a powerful message about their values.

While the importance of social media marketing is generally accepted, the fact that people don't question its value is all the more reason to think about exactly what its value is.

If you accept the trends indicating digital is the future, while physical retail is in decline, Canada could find itself shut out entirely — as in, not even the branch plant benefits — from the retail part of the value chain.

Glassman noted that unlike market securities, including stocks, which have an accepted valuation at time of sale, collectibles like artwork or wine may not be eligible for a deduction up to the current market value.

So my point is if the promise that we buy into is that Bitcoin will become a widely accepted currency in and of itself one day, and that it will account for a huge percent of international transactions, thereby realizing its potential value, we need to also accept that the potential has not yet been realized and right now, in the midst of this euphoria, 90 % of buyers are just trying to get rich quick in dollar terms by trading it.

Pushing the company to accept an offer from a firm such as Valeant, with a history of value destruction, is a disservice to current shareholders not an unlocking of value.

We need not assume that stocks will become reasonably valued anytime soon, but even if one is willing to accept some amount of speculative risk in an overvalued market, there's no need to accept undue risk at clearly overbought and overbullish points.

One issue is that although many of the big institutions are curious about how bitcoin's underlying blockchain technology could revolutionize the financial sector, bitcoin isn't widely accepted as currency and has no intrinsic value.

Second, given bitcoin's tremendous price volatility, it does not qualify as a numeraire — a commonly accepted benchmark used to assign value to goods and services.

For instance, Home Depot now only accepts store credit for in - store purchases, not online ones, and requires ID when credits are redeemed, thus limiting the resale value of store credit.

««Virtual currencies» means a digital representation of value that is neither issued by a central bank or a public authority, not attached to a legally established currency, which does not possess the legal status of currency or money, but is accepted by natural or legal persons as a means of exchange or for other purposes, and can be transferred, stored or traded electronically.

With smaller - value retail payments — think of buying a coffee — consumers and institutions are willing to accept additional risk and do not face immediate time constraints for receiving money.

Though Bitcoin's value has been slumping recently, merchants like Overstock are not affected because they accept the currency through a third - party payment processor, which converts the sales to dollars.

The point of the chart above is to illustrate that those with an agenda to ride the trend and look smart are correct when they state that the US stock market is not particularly over valued... if one shuts off one's brain and accepts policy (blue Monetary Base line, which is but one of several money supply measures) as being at all normal or healthy.

As the value of a Bitcoin soars toward $ 10,000, consumers haven't quite caught on to the alternative currency accepted at a number of local businesses.

If the winner can not accept the car they will have a choice of donating the equivalent value to a recommended charity or charity of winner's choice in the name of the winner.

The proposal defines «virtual currencies» as a digital representation of value that can be digitally transferred, stored or traded and accepted by natural or legal persons as a medium of exchange, but does not have legal tender status.

We believe that the currency will not only grow in value over time but will later probably be accepted for payment on the KICKICO platform itself.

While «operating earnings» are not even defined under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, and «forward operating earnings» only surfaced as a creature of Wall Street in the early 1980's, it's simple enough to impute historical values of forward operating earnings because they are almost completely explained by observable earnings and employment data — see Long - term Evidence on the Fed Model and Forward Operating Earnings.

You on the other hand take the hard line of absolutely not accepting anything at face value and draw a conclusion immediately.

What I do find odd is that the religious right is so quick to accept a Mormon for his «values» yet they don't seem to understand or care that he doesn't believe as Christians do concerning who Jesus was.

Accepting at face value the assertion that Rick Perry has a Divine calling to run for the Republican nomination, we are lead to the question of whether it was a call to Mr. Perry to become the nominee or whether it was, instead, a call to Mr. Perry to teach a lesson about how people should not take the Name in vain in order to obtain political office.

Or, maybe we can just accept that there are different views in this world and just because someone doesn't hold our same values doesn't mean they are a bigot at all, but that might really be too much to ask in today's America.

Simply put, this is a narrow minded, biased, bigoted approach that does NOT value diversity but instead values only allegence to certain politically accepted thought processes and positions.

You can keep on saying everyone has sin to keep your happy and say everyone should accept religion, because that's your ignorance, just don't push your fabricated sins that comes with religion to others who value a clean unmuddled mind.

However, I do not accept at face value your characterization of all of the events as malicious on our part.

I guess I am a wolf then... certainly not one of the flock who follows where led... but i commend you on attempting to peal back the layers... We should all be like that... not accepting things at face value.

If the requisite disjunctive synthesis can not be explained by appeal to the doctrine that God values all possible worlds, this is not so much because evaluation is logically dependent upon gradations of importance, but because (accepting Christian's explanation of the absence of such gradations in the primordial nature) the logic of the doctrine itself entails that God be inextricably involved in the formation of actual worlds as «circles of convergence,» i.e., in «the orderings effected by individuals in the course of nature.»

His refusal to accept either an «objective» or a «subjective» art is equivalent to the rebel's search for a value that transcends history but which does not diminish human freedom and creativity.

In this way, tolerance of a person's value does not mean I must accept that person's views.

If religious belief is attained when reason makes a «total response of the total being to what is apprehended as the ultimate reality,» such that in this act reason is reborn, then it follows that those who totally accept a given world - view as ultimate, whether it be theistic or non-theistic, naturalistic or supernaturalistic, immanentist or transcendentalist, as normative for their entire lives and as the supreme value in their hierarchy of values, and hence not taken as a means but as an end, belong to the religious dimension.

After felicitously noting that for Soloveitchik «victory and defeat are of equal value,» he succumbs to the natural pull of a more one - sided, hierarchical position, writing that the motion of submissive retreat «is inherently endowed with holiness,» while «the act of advance is not in itself holy,» and so must be «imbued with this quality through the willingness to accept defeat.»

Is a third possibility a real one, some way of acknowledging the power and value of «fairy» that is not simply to accept either the domestic illusion or the larger and more dreadful nihilistic fantasy?

Values can not be identified with what is desired, and society can not accept the market alone as the basis for deciding which desires should be fulfilled.

The Algerian war certainly has not led the Algerians to accept Western values — though the Castro and Nasser dictatorships are certainly no advertisement for socialist values.

The value of faith stems not from the irrationality of its object but from the humility that is required to see the truth which is accepted, and the courage required to act upon it.

If modern Christianity has patterned itself after Jesus, then the Jesus we present to the world is not the Jesus who rejected the offers of self - reliance, control over others, and glory before men, but is the «Jesus» who has accepted such values and now holds them up as virtues.

Second, given that the atheist doesn't accept life - after - death, what value does life have for you?

I have called this the coup de culture, in which Judeo / Christian moral philosphy (which is different from religious faith), the once generally accepted value system of the West is being supplanted by a (roughly) utilitarian / hedonistic (not in the sensual sense) / scientism - radical environmentalism view of life.

If the traditional formulations of God show him to be the Perfect Good, Absolute Truth and Supreme Being, since goodness, truth and being are positive values, then there should not be too great a difficulty in accepting a formulation of God's eternity as Absolute or Perfect Time, since time is now revealed to us as positive, thanks to the discovery of evolution.

Values can not be identified simply with what is desired, and society can not accept the market alone as the basis for deciding which desires should be fulfilled.

We can live as Christians in this world and therefore as members of a particular socio - economic class as long as we do not automatically accept its values and standards.

But to grasp this it is necessary (a) not to overlook the biological (morphogenic) value of moral action, and (b) to accept the organic nature of individual relationships.

If one's self - worth, or the value of individuality, is not accepted, solitariness is blocked from becoming communal.

You say «values» at the end, I can only assume to imply Nye, and those who accept the facts of the world around us do not have «values» and you do.

On the other hand, Watanabe, devout Christian that he is, has received a host of Buddhist feelings as his birthright by virtue of his Japanese heritage — just as a feeling for Christian values is an Americans birthright whether one chooses to accept the Christian faith or not.

Reading receptively and trustingly does not mean accepting everything in the text at face value, as Paul's own critical sifting of the Torah demonstrates.

While we need not agree with or accept the beliefs or values of others, as Christians it is incumbent on us to love and accept others, regardless of what they believe or do.

While trying to take the «pro-life» claim seriously, I have not accepted it at face value, but rather have conducted research to find evidence.

If our human existence is not that of some supposedly substantial and indestructible soul to whom experiences happen, but is rather those experiences themselves held together in unity and given identity by the awareness and self - awareness which makes it possible for us to say «I» and «you», then the enduring reality, which God accepts and values, is precisely that series of events or occasions which go to make us what we are.