Sentences with phrase «n't accept this view»

I believe every word is inspired by the Holy Spirit and thus I do not accept the view.

Yes, the Christians that we dislike, we dislike because of their non-inclusionary att.itude towards everyone who doesn't accept their view, including fellow, more moderate Christians.

For the faithful in Christ can not accept this view, which holds either that after Adam there existed men on this earth who did not receive their origin by natural generation from him, the first parent of all, or that Adam signifies some kind of multiple first parents; for it is by no means apparent how such an opinion can be reconciled with what the sources of revealed truth and the acts of the magisterium of the Church teach about original sin, which proceeds from a sin truly committed by one Adam, and which is transmitted to all by generation, and exists in each one as his own» -LCB- Humani Generis 37).

He could not accept the view that the children should suffer for the sins of their parents and grandparents.

Black theology can not accept a view of God which does not represent him as being for blacks and thus against whites... black [204] people have no time for a neutral God... There is no use for a God who loves whites the same as blacks... What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors, here and now, by any means at their disposal.

Just for clarification, I don't accept this view.

If he has not done it well, then others must do it better; but we can not accept the view that it should not be attempted.

On the other hand, Thomas could not accept the view that the conclusions of philosophy should either replace the content of revelation or be regarded as untrue.

On the one hand, Thomas Aquinas could not accept the view that the great achievements of Greek rationality should simply be ignored by Christians or assumed to be fundamentally distorted by sin.

I believe many will not accept my view on this one right away, but if you think about it, you will see I have a point.

Aobs by contrast are simply DETRACTORS, they detest anyone who doesn't accept their view, whether it is born out of hysteria or perception.

If the Home Office appears to be hesitant about change, it is partly because the Prison Service has not accepted the view of most researchers that prisons are actually riskier environments than the outside world.

Similar to how confident women live outside of their comfort zones, they also don't accept views and ideas simply because they're told to.

I should provide the missing viewpoints, for instance those who argue that the LNT [«Linear No Threshold» model of radiation risk] underestimates the risk at low doses, and I should provide the reasons that BEIR VII did not accept this view, showing that BEIR VII takes a middle ground.

You just don't accept that view.

Not exact matches

Don't accept it from a point of view of weakness, but accept it from a point of view of strength.

The service has an uphill battle in physical stores because it is not accepted everywhere and is not widely viewed as a significant upgrade over physical cards.

«We must be open to alternative points of view, not alternative facts,» Cook said, while accepting the Free Expression Award at the Newseum in Washington, D.C, according to 9 to 5 Mac.

This consolidated measure is not determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) and should not be viewed as a substitute for the most directly comparable GAAP measure, shareholders» net income.

«Some RIAs I work with focus on mid - and large - market 401 (k) plans; they won't accept rollovers, they view it as a conflict of interest and will flat out not handle rollovers.»

A few days later, while arguing that his personal feelings on the matter should not affect the ultimate decision to accept or reject the proposal, he stated, «from my [point of view] it seems that the community's feeling on this issue isalready [sic] clear.»

Yet, even with yields hovering around 3 % for the first time since 2013, investors should not be so quick to accept the bearish consensus view.

The non-GAAP financial measures provided should be viewed in addition to, and not as an alternative for, results prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America («GAAP») that are presented in this press release.

The non-GAAP financial measures provided should be viewed in addition to, and not as an alternative for, financial measures prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America («GAAP») that are presented in this press release.

According to this view, since policymakers would not accept permanently rising rates of inflation, economies would tend to fluctuate around a natural rate of unemployment, determined by factors such as labor flexibility, the availability of benefits, and the effectiveness of hiring and job searches.

In my view, the necessary objective is to accept market risk when the likely return / risk profile is attractive, based on observable measures of valuation and market action, and to avoid, hedge, or diversify away those risks that don't carry attractive return / risk profiles on average.

Evidently, if you don't quite accept the view that the market is efficient (and Buffett doesn't either), a few strategies come in handy.

I agree that academic freedom is really important; it ensures that scholarship and teaching are not limited to popular and accepted views.

You accept only your view and theory but when someone with a different view comes along then all of a sudden you are not as accepting!

Accepting this fallibility not only makes it easier to respect a view you disagree with, but to have understanding and compassion for the person with the opposing view, since you recognized that we all make mistakes.

I believe those with differing views also feel accepted, and do not feel ostracized or accused of intolerance for their beliefs.

I said it to hotair already, but I will expand it a bit for you: what is evidence for some is not accepted by everyone; just as in a court case, some jurors are convinced with very little evidence while some people can not be convinced of something no matter how much evidence there is... much of this comes from how you were raised and your own personal world view, for many people God does not fit into their world view so whatever evidence there is they close their eyes and say, «No, I don't believe that!»

Egg Recall when Topher said he was not forcing his views on children by handing out religious tracts, the kids could accept it or reject it.

when you need to justify everything that those who do not already accept your view point out, that doesn't automatically make you right.

Or, maybe we can just accept that there are different views in this world and just because someone doesn't hold our same values doesn't mean they are a bigot at all, but that might really be too much to ask in today's America.

And it is a very twisted view that was not accepted by the church until some 400 + years after Christ.

Now, if someone wants to prove to me that not all Mormons believe in their orthodox views on the afterlife or gender, then I'll be much more accepting of Mormon belief.

I also think many of the the views he tries to shame us into accepting are very naive and do not hold the moral high ground he seems to believe they do.

The kindergarten logic of the believer that those who accept big bang as the furthest back we can go in this iteration of the Universe means they think «something can't come from nothing» is as much a misrepresentation of Hawkins» view of the cosmos as your articulation of his view of pansp.ermia was.

As a reader trying to be charitable, I face an unattractive choice: accept that His Eminence does hold the mistaken view that mercy is essential to God; or assume that when he emphatically made the multiple important statements at key points in his book that mercy is essential to God, he didn't mean them.

Russ — I think there are contradictions, someone else doesn't, we recognize each other's points of view without requiring the other to accept them — voila!

I don't accept the currently fashionable assertion that any view is automatically as worthy of respect as any equal and opposite view.

Those who did not acquiesce to the accepted in this matter view were simply shunned and / or driven out.

Preliminary questionnaires designed to gauge their significance, popularity, and influence produce inaccurate results, because respondents to these questionnaires prefer to voice «commonly accepted» points of view that may not coincide with what they believe.

New readings are offered in place of conventional or accepted ones, not with the view that they necessarily correspond more adequately to the reality in question in toto, but that they are a discovery / creation of some aspect of that reality overlooked in other readings, or one especially pertinent to the times, etc..

In this way, tolerance of a person's value does not mean I must accept that person's views.

If religious belief is attained when reason makes a «total response of the total being to what is apprehended as the ultimate reality,» such that in this act reason is reborn, then it follows that those who totally accept a given world - view as ultimate, whether it be theistic or non-theistic, naturalistic or supernaturalistic, immanentist or transcendentalist, as normative for their entire lives and as the supreme value in their hierarchy of values, and hence not taken as a means but as an end, belong to the religious dimension.

I agree with not going trying to change the world as in change to people by telling them they are wrong and I am right (IF I have understood your point of view) but I guess I'm not so convinced when it comes to society, and just accepting what ever **** is in there or anywhere.

Steve, you may be right that they are not necessarily incompatible, but I can't help but point out that your religious views are causing you to refuse to accept well - established science.

This can be done from many points of view, but I have suggested above that the crucial attack is that which accepts the same data and then shows that the argument does not exclude the presence of contingent elements in God's total nature.