They will sometimes allow officers to testify about those conclusions, but most patrol officers aren't accident reconstruction experts.
Not exact matches
An investigation by an experienced personal injury lawyer could involve any or all of the following: hiring investigators to investigate the
accident scene, retaining medical and property damage experts,
accident reconstruction experts, and full case analysis and trial preparation, if a case is
not settled prior to trial.
There is an organization that accredits and certifies
accident reconstruction experts, the Accreditation Commission for Traffic
Accident Reconstruction, but the accreditation process takes time, money and no small amount of brainpower, and it isn't in any way mandatory to have such accreditation in order to work in the field.
A lawyer can combine his or her legal knowledge and information from working with
accident reconstruction specialists and professionals in forensics to build a compelling case on the victim's behalf that
not only determines the cause of the truck
accident but also proves this in court.
(My view is
not quite this strong on whether you should use
accident reconstruction experts in liability dispute cases.
This includes, but is
not limited to, obtaining witness statements, hiring private investigators to gather such statements, and
accident reconstruction engineers in cases where liability, impact severity or
accident details are unknown or are in dispute.
If the NTSB is
not involved after your
accident, you can still receive investigation results from an independent
accident reconstruction expert.
In the case above involving the motor vehicle
accident, we may work with professionals in
accident reconstruction to prove that the other driver was texting and therefore didn't see that you had stopped in front of him or her, causing the driver to rear - end your vehicle.
But, there is a growing sentiment in car
accident cases that juries just don't listen to
accident reconstruction experts.
Not only will we hire
accident reconstruction experts and investigative experts to discover the root cause of what happened, our Philadelphia truck
accident attorneys will strive to prove negligence and liability to help you recover the money necessary to get your life back on track.
Not only will we hire
accident reconstruction experts and investigative experts to discover the root cause of what happened, our
As a general rule, the police officer did
not see the
accident and so it's useful to know that a skilled personal injury attorney will have a number of
accident reconstruction experts to turn to and these people will have a lot more time than a police officer to really look at the skid marks, look at the vehicle damage and come to a conclusion as to speed, distance, etc..
It may be discovered during an
accident reconstruction that you were actually
not at fault.
This is because after the fact, it is
not possible through
accident reconstruction modeling to determine at what combination of lower speed and lesser weight recovery from the weave instability would have been practicable.
They will do everything they can — including hiring
accident reconstruction experts — to show that the
accident wasn't entirely the defendant's fault.
What most victims do
not realize is that there are various regulations and circumstances which involve Maryland truck
accident law, Federal Motor Carrier Safety regulations,
accident reconstruction, investigations, and ultimately the chain of liability of the
accident.
It is
not uncommon for both sides of the case to do
accident reconstruction to prove their respective cases.
She did
not have an expert on on
accident reconstruction prepared to say «probably»; or, at least, Ms. Clements» lawyers could
not find one that they were prepared to put on the stand.
Through our many years of practice, we have developed a network of accomplished and reputable professionals across all industries including but
not limited to
accident reconstruction experts, engineers, medical doctors, psychologists, and economists.
Based on the evidence given by Mr. Richer and that of his passenger Mr. Moran, the GPS evidence, and the expert
accident reconstruction evidence that she accepted, the trial judge found that: i) Mr. Richer was operating the bus at a rate of speed in excess of the posted speed limit ii) critically, Mr. Richer did
not decelerate on his approach to the intersection; iii) the pre-impact speed of the bus exceeded 65.6 kilometres per hour after it entered the intersection; and iv) Mr. Richer was momentarily inattentive to the road ahead when he glanced left and then right, into the side mirrors of the City bus.