«Also, if the atmosphere isn't accumulating heat at the rate forecast by the models, then the theoretical positive climate feedbacks which were expected to amplify the CO2 effect won't be as large,» McNider said.
Oceans are cooling «Ocean heat touches on the very core of the AGW hypothesis: When all is said and done, if the climate system is
not accumulating heat, the hypothesis is invalid.
The troposphere doesn't exhibit a hot spot, the stratosphere isn't cooling, the oceans are
not accumulating heat, the warming has been 40 % of that expected, and the models are inching close to falsification.
«the Stratosphere can
not accumulate any heat; to slow down cooling of the planet tomorrow — because: by tomorrow, the planet will be million miles away from that spot, spinning around the sun.»
Oceans are cooling «Ocean heat touches on the very core of the AGW hypothesis: When all is said and done, if the climate system is
not accumulating heat, the hypothesis is invalid.
Not exact matches
Oceanographers may have solved one of the biggest sea mysteries in years: why the upper ocean didn't warm between 2003 and 2010, even as
heat - trapping greenhouse gases
accumulated in the air above.
While the planet's surface didn't warm as fast, vast amounts of
heat energy continued to
accumulate in the oceans and with the switch in the PDO, some of this energy could now spill back into the atmosphere.
Is it when the leak is of such a large volume but
not large enough that the engine just doesn't operate at all so at least the engine goes through enough combustion cycles to
accumulate enough
heat to drive an overheat scenario?
My question, if the El Nino does
not deliver the punch anticipated or does
not actually arrive this fall or winter, where does the
accumulating ocean
heat go?
If it trapped
heat energy then it would
not let it go and all the
heat would have
accumulated in it for billions of years.
I think I understand the analogy as it pertains to the actual Atlantic Meridional Overturning, but I can
not follow how it explains what happens to the
heat that
accumulates as a result of AGW in, for example, the Sahara Desert, the Amazon Rain Forest, Antartica and Siberia.
In his State of the Union address to Congress last night, President Obama (no surprise) echoed the agencies» definitiveness on 2014's record
heat, but wisely didn't dwell on that, making the point that the pattern is the key (along with the
accumulating science pointing to specific rising risks):
It did
not: the entire planet is
accumulating heat due to an energy imbalance.
The fact that I can point to the majority of models
not predicting this fast of a decline, and you can point out a few that say that it might have started by now and it hasn't, totally ignores the fact that either way, sea ice is diminishing and that is consistent with
accumulating heat in the Earth's climate system.
But during the «Hiatus» periods, the top of the ocean doesn't
accumulate nearly as much
heat whereas the next lower levels
accumulate more.
If the oceans weren't continuing to
accumulate heat, sea levels would
not be rising nearly as fast.
# 3: the planet hasn't
accumulated enough» extra»
heat for the last 150y,, to boil one chicken egg!!
The indirect solar part is the stored
heat in the world ocean and land masses that does
not cool off overnight, and hence «
accumulates».
While the warming of average global surface temperatures has slowed (though
not nearly as much as previously believed), the overall amount of
heat accumulated by the global climate has
not, with over 90 percent being absorbed by the oceans.
«It's
not quite a runaway situation, but it does accelerate once it starts to thaw and
accumulates heat.»
Another side effect of
heat is that the normal solution of covering ones eyelashes with Vaseline did
not stop coal dust
accumulating there.
Ignorant hypothetical don't - know - much - science question: isn't there an important difference with Co2 -
accumulated heat?
If less energy comes in, the governor will try to maintain the energy flux into the system (Willis's retarding the appearance of clouds) but once all stops have been pulled out (the sky is clear morning to night), then the engine slows down — slower air and water currents, less addition of
heat to the polar areas, dissipation of what
heat has
accumulated by radiation into space and return cold water
not getting the
heating it formerly did.
LIA wasn't GLOBAL cooling; but colder in Europe, north America — because Arctic ocean had less ice cover - > was releasing more
heat / was
accumulating - > radiating + spreading more coldness — currents were taking that extra coldness to Mexican gulf — then to the Mediterranean — because Sahara was increasing creation of dry
heat and evaporating extra water in the Mediterranean — to top up the deficit — gulf stream was faster / that was melting more ice on arctic also as chain reaction — Because Mediterranean doesn't have enough tributaries, to compensate for the evaporation deficit.
You do have such an amazing molecule in your fictional world, defying gravity it can stay up in the atmosphere for hundreds and even thousands of years
accumulating though it's one and a half times heavier than air, and, with no
heat capacity to spit at, it can trap
heat, or, heck you can't even get your stories to say the same thing consistently, it becomes this great thermal blanket stopping
heat escaping... just how much of that blanket is holes?
What they do show is that without cloud cover the Earth cools more rapidly, hey, why isn't all the carbon dioxide
accumulating in the atmosphere backradiating
not only to delay that, but backradiating
heat to the Earth as Spencer defends the fictional AGW energy budget?
Assuming for the sake of argument that «the pause» is
not an instrument error and the troposphere hasn't gotten any warmer in 16 years then this raises the question of how ocean
heat content could be rising which, according to ARGO, at least the upper half of the ocean is
accumulating thermal energy.
This «
heat» does
not «
accumulate», or get «stored».
Based on the trend in maximum temperatures, the region was
not overheating nor
accumulating heat.
There doesn't seem to be a reservoir of
heat accumulating anywhere so if warming resumes it will probably be at the 1990s rate or less.
There are two; the first is that the oceans have
not been
accumulating heat since 2004.
It seems that we can explain this only if solar
heat accumulates at the sea surface and doesn't get released to the atmosphere or transferred to greater depth.
Earth's climate system has
not stopped
accumulating energy over the past years, but ocean - atmosphere cycles (mainly a cool PDO) have slowed the rate of flow of latent and sensible
heat from ocean to atmosphere.
John Christy: Since 1978, we've been able to monitor the bulk atmospheric temperature, which tells you whether
heat has been
accumulating or
not.
There isn't enough
heat capacity for
heat to
accumulate, so the only way to reach balance is through extra
heat losses from the Earth (to exactly balance the forcing).
Even if AGW use the unsubstantiated claim that CO2 stays in the atmosphere
accumulating for hundreds and even thousands of years, take your pick, they make up the numbers to suit, and double current amounts actually stayed in the atmosphere, this would be nonsense as «insulating blanket» to
not only stop
heat loss globally but raise the global temperature of the Earth.