All s - i - ns against man are also s - i -
ns against God.
@HeavenSent There are 2 types of s - i - n in the world s - i - ns against man and s - i -
ns against god.
I'm
not against God since I don't believe he exists.
for - ni - ca - tion is a s - i -
n against God because it breaks his rules but not man becasue it has no human vic - tim.
Let God judge all s - i -
ns against God or Man.
It's
not against God's law or any other law to make an honest living and be rewarded because of your diligence.
God is a fool if he thinks you are either with him or against him... that is truly a false, ignorant statement by men.I am
not against any gods, I simply do not believe they exist, so I can not be for or against.
But my protests aren't against any gods, as they are highly unlikely to exist.
Science is
not against god.
Jonathan — the fight is
not against a god, the fight is against people who claim to speak for him / her / it / them and quite frankly act like jerks in the process.
Calm down guys, we are only playing against barcelona and
not against God.
Not exact matches
The late Peter L. Bernstein, author of «
Against the
Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk,» wrote that risk means we don't know what will happen.
If Sarah Palin really believed in
God and in
God's creations all being equal, she would
not be
against gay marriage and the rights of all humans to be equal.
2: Make no graven image —
NOT A LAW = > intellectual property is a
God to many, we have tones of laws protecting
against false copies (Irrelevent.
James was defending his right to believe in
God against the voices of high - minded scientific skepticism, the Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins of yore who would tell him that it's foolish and intellectually lazy to believe what reason and data can't demonstrate to be true.
1: Have no other
gods —
NOT A LAW = > In
God we trust is on our legal currency 2: Make no graven image —
NOT A LAW = > intellectual property is a
God to many, we have tones of laws protecting
against false copies 3: Don't take the name in vain —
NOT A LAW = > false testimony is a crime as is swearing in some states 4: Honor the Sabbath —
NOT A LAW = > employment law in many states prohibits forced labor on religious days 5: Honor thy father and mother —
NOT A LAW = > minors have limited right to transact commerce under 19.
Now I am
not against teaching about giving, but I believe it is a gift from
God to us to be able to give, and I believe if the love for
God and the love for people are taught, giving will happen — giving for the right purposes.
But you wont be able to legally discriminate sorry - just like in the 60s when you couldnt be bigoted
against blacks anymore - as much as you screamed and yelled about «dem dare rights» - times are a changing please die off soon - and please,
god please - do
nt infect your kids with that bile - give them a chance!
Someone who speaks
against Jesus (Christianity) and Moses (Judaism) and do
not hold the Bible and Torah as
God's words are prohibited from calling himself / herself a «Muslim».
Fools, you argue
against the things of
God yet can
not see that the word
GOD alone carries something greater than the vocable.
= > miracles will
not convince a heart set
against God as only
God through the Holy Spirit can do that.
The issue is though, many of the things
God made, are being described by science, with a lock being placed on those descriptions saying
God can't be mentioned at the same time, and that is wrong... it's blasphemy
against God.
This does
not so much support wagering
against God, as dismissing all talk of «wagerings» altogether.
(anything that is
against God's will) And the one's who do
not see, and do
nt see anything with your eyes.
There is ample evidence for the existence of
God, what you decide to do with this evidence is ultimately up to you, but do
not claim that there is none... and I would submit to you that many people believe many things without evidence every single day... but do
not lump all people of faith into one basket... I have personal proof that
God exists, but proof for me may
not be proof for you, some people can see something with their own eyes and still deny it, that is why I said it is ultimately up to you to decide what you believe... there is much evidence both for and
against the existence of
God, you need to decide which evidence you choose to believe...
This is what helps you to understand that the account is the truth, that when you claim «nothing» can do the impossible, and then claim
God can't do something relatively insignificant compared to that, then you are being very biased
against God, and giving incredible amounts of credit to «nothing» at the same time... that is unrealistic in the extreme.
I guess we don't need to worry about trying to research and cure Down syndrome, since
god causes it intentionally and we can't go
against god's will.
Gary wrong again, Gary wrong again: I was a guest before this on this blog: Even check out Martin Zender; The World's most outspoken bible scholar facebook; You will find me there; he knows me, and his crew knows of me; Father has others too that have been with me for years that are
not in my city through their ministries also that have come up along side of me, but I do
not want you to come
against them as they have their own trials to overcome, therefore; no names given there, they also know me and my testimony: I am
God's workmanship therefore, I was brought up in Christ along side witnesses as His testimony: Gary; this is going to be shocking, but because
God does
not inform you of a thing, means to me, that He has kept very much from you: Now why would that be?
You're either for or
against the most incredible being you probably can't imagine:
God.
That's the bad news that makes the good news make sense: The good news is that even at the time that Adam and Eve sinned
against God, He desired that they
not be separated from Him forever, yet knew that their sins demanded that payment.
But since you and I both know
God is the ultimate authority and thus sets the standard, and
God clearly is
against abortion, and the atheists are erroneously calling very early human life nothing but «a bunch of cells,» isn't it up to us to fight for those lives?
But until we come to the end of ourselves then we are going to do and say what we want, even as it was with me: It's one thing to be a heathen, even as I was, but a whole other ball game to set our hearts on
God and His truth; yet, that can only come when we are sick and tired of being sick and tired of our own lives and we just give up, we know then who has given up by the one they advocate for, even has given place to: Paul said; with my heart I want to do what is right, but my flesh does what I hate: This is when
God's grace is sufficient, because our hearts are right with
God, but our flesh is
not: There is a war going on within these temples, therefore; even as our flesh wins out to do what we hate, our hearts are set on
God and His ways which has been established in the Word of Truth, which then causes us to stand and speak forth what we believe, even as this causes a rending to happen within us, for Christ to be formed in us this needs to be, as we come up in His glories even for a better resurrection for them who believe: The heart wars
against our flesh, even as Christ wars
against the man of sin within: For out of the abundance of our hearts our mouth doth speak, therefore; if we speak
not the Wholesome Words of our Lord, Then our hearts are still wicked: But to advocate for wickedness instead of Christ, one has become a teacher of lawlessness, he then advocates for the man of sin: Many who have come out of religion has done this, as they went from one mountain top «from the extreme right» of self exaltation (Religion) to the other mountain top «to the extreme left» of the (Heathen) and missed the valley in - between that is takes to humble us: One extreme to the other, and missed Jesus: Jesus is taking ones through the valley's to strip us down of all who we are before exalting us to be just as He, even as the Christ in us overcomes that man of sin (Adam) through theses valleys of contrast that cause a rending to happen within; and when we are rent in two, we stand on His word of truth, so we too can become one with Him, even as Jesus is with our Father: This is how Christ is formed in us: Thank - you Father; in Jesus Name Alexandria
They do
not follow satan in ANY way and we follow the Bible as well as the Book of Mormon, which has nothing about following satan or anything
against the will of
God.
All religions were created by men -
not women - to control the masses.They have discriminated
against women from the beginning and in «the name of
God» have created more wars, deaths and destruction than anything else in the world.Religions are nothing more that dictatorships in the «name of
God»... pure bull!!!
It would be utterly disgusting of me to generalize all people of faith as liars, corrupt theocrats and child abusers, so I won't... but I will
not remain silent as the children of
God pass judgment
against others the way jesus told them
not to.
But you can't love
God while you're sinning
against Him.
Judas was
not to become a martyr because of the way the apostles wrote about him in the Gospel - they saw through the eyes of men, and Judas was unable to redeem himself before he died a natural death, dying instead loathed, hated & driven to suicide for his deed
against the Son of
God, Jesus, whom he had Loved so much.
You can love
God while sinning
against Him, isn't that the point of Confession and penance??
Don't whine
against God but be thankful.
Making hormonal contraception more widely available is
not only a sin
against God, but is no real favor to women's health either.
It is truth that
God has troubles within the fractal paradigms of inter-cellular cosmological wherein «activists» sometimes revolt
against the grains of our embodied sanctifications creating many undulations of travesties
not uncommonly viewed by us celestial beings as being viral and bacteriological in the way we understand things to be and become.
No,
God or Jesus would
not promote intolerance
against groups such as gays.
The pastors would say it was King Solomon who was prophesied in 2 Samuel 7:12 - 14 but he wasn't flogged by men when he committed sin
against God.
Look, if
god / jesus is all - loving, he won't hold it
against me for using the brain he gave me to think.
Always was and is and will ever be no matter what matters of materialized shapes to tend to seemingly clutter up His spiritual abundancy It is truth that
God has troubles within the fractal paradigms of inter-cellular cosmologies as protruding «activists» are sometimes revolting
against the grains of our embodied sanctifications creating many undulations of travesties
not uncommonly being viewed by us celestial beings as being viral and bacteriological in the way we understand things to be and become.
You are making statements
against one that we love even though you do
not know
God.
Don't take that to mean that I'm
against god though, because he doesn't exist.
Kant's approach may hold at bay the antihumanism of modern science (we are just clever animals in an insignificant corner of a vast cosmos), and it may serve as a bulwark
against the ruthless rationality of economic efficiency and the putative demands of progress, but Michalson concludes that Kant's approach to the question of
God makes theology less and
not more plausible.
It is truth that
God has troubles within the fractal paradigms of inter-cellular cosmological «activists» sometimes revolting
against the grains of our embodied sanctifications creating many undulations of travesties
not uncommonly viewed by us celestial beings as being viral and bacteriological in the way we understand things to be and become.
So why has
not every christian that says they believe in
god, love and Jesus been marching in the streets every day for the last 10 + years
against the 2 wars we've been fighting in?