Sentences with phrase «n't against posting»

Not exact matches

«We do not do this lightly,» said Facebook, «but they have repeatedly posted content designed to incite animosity and hatred against minority groups, which disqualifies the Pages from our service.»
In a blog post, a Facebook vice president said the Gizmodo story was inaccurate, and that the site doesn't «allow or advise our reviewers to discriminate against sources of any political origin, period.»
Phillip Crawley wasn't exactly a modest guy when the Fleet Street veteran came to Canada to defend The Globe and Mail against Conrad Black's National Post in the late 1990s.
At the time, YouTube issued a short statement saying that it «prohibits violent or gory content posted in a shocking, sensational or disrespectful manner,» but it did not say whether it would take any action against Paul or if it would delete his account.
«Sources indicate that most of the cases of threats against Jewish communities and organizations, though not all, led investigators back to Israel,» The Jerusalem Post reports.
Earlier this month when asked by The Washington Post, he didn't rule out the possibility of running against Trump in 2020 — something he has repeatedly alluded to in different ways.
The post suggests he would not run against Trump if he decides to pursue re-election, instead, he may opt to run in eight years, perhaps as the country nears the conclusion of what could possibly be Trump's second term as president.
Strengthening the earlier ruling, the Viennese appeals court ruled on Friday that Facebook (fb) must remove the postings against Greens leader Eva Glawischnig as well as any verbatim repostings, and said merely blocking them in Austria without deleting them for users abroad was not sufficient.
Unfortunately 48 (or 96 %) of the replies were generic «throw it against the wall» replies that had no bearing on the post and did not follow the instructions.
Court documents outlining the charges against Winner did not specifically cite the NSA report that had been posted on the website.
Rashon Nelson and Donte Robinson chose not to pursue a lawsuit against the city, Mike Dunn, a spokesman for the city of Philadelphia, told The Washington Post.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, you agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Daily Harvest, and our respective past, present and future employees, officers, directors, contractors, consultants, equityholders, suppliers, vendors, service providers, parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, representatives, predecessors, successors and assigns (individually and collectively, the «Daily Harvest Parties»), from and against all actual or alleged Daily Harvest Party or third party claims, damages, awards, judgments, losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, interest, fees, expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys» fees and expenses) and costs (including, without limitation, court costs, costs of settlement and costs of pursuing indemnification and insurance), of every kind and nature whatsoever, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, matured or unmatured, or suspected or unsuspected, in law or equity, whether in tort, contract or otherwise (collectively, «Claims»), including, but not limited to, damages to property or personal injury, that are caused by, arise out of or are related to (a) your use or misuse of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation of these Terms, (e) your violation of the rights of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse of the Sites or Products provided to you.
This post isn't for or against Bitcoin.
In his most recent blog post, Alex makes a convincing case against Trump's protectionism, which are «not good for the economy or the market» and «undermines American economic growth.»
Also on Wednesday, the company posted the results of the promised independent investigation on its website; it concluded that various allegations against the company were not «borne out by the facts.»
James Damore, a former Google engineer who was fired in August after posting a memo to an internal Google message board arguing that women may not be equally represented in tech because they are biologically less capable of engineering, has filed a class action lawsuit against the company in Santa Clara Superior Court in Northern California.
Having said that, they also post a warning against Americans: Whaleclub is accessible in over 190 countries with full privacy.Whaleclub live trading is NOT available to residents of the United States of America or any other jurisdiction where such services may be restricted.Despite this, there's no doubt that a host of nationalities that can not trade forex or digital currencies (Americans, Brazilians, Canadians, etc.) will do so with using the offshore facilities of WhaleclNOT available to residents of the United States of America or any other jurisdiction where such services may be restricted.Despite this, there's no doubt that a host of nationalities that can not trade forex or digital currencies (Americans, Brazilians, Canadians, etc.) will do so with using the offshore facilities of Whaleclnot trade forex or digital currencies (Americans, Brazilians, Canadians, etc.) will do so with using the offshore facilities of Whaleclub.
Though, I do not remember where, but I actually saw a post which went against the idea of interviewing in blog posts.
As Breitbart News reported, the Washington Post and the Hill obtained a copy of the eight articles of impeachment drawn up by the conservative House Freedom Caucus against Rosenstein because he has not provided the documentation requested as part an investigation into FBI surveillance during the 2016 presidential election.
As the title to this post indicates, successful B2B lead generation is simply too important to leave in the hands of your salespeople (and please note, this is not a slight against salespeople).
The Washington Post reported Thursday that White House counsel Don McGahn had known about the allegations against Porter for a year, and that chief of staff John Kelly had known for months, although the Daily Mail reported that Trump did not know about them until this week.
The brokers these robot creators partner with are in most cases, not regulated at all and in more than a few cases, our research showed a high number of complaints posted against them all over the Internet.
Rosales has never filed a claim against a worker who violated a non-disparagement clause with an online post, and in his experience, he said, those clauses don't prevent workers from exercising their rights to speak about workplace conditions.
If we post against it's not posted.
I post when I want but I don't hold unemployment, illness, retirement or youth against anyone, Christian or Atheist, who wants to fill their time posting here.
@Mujeeb 1) zakir naik is an idiot, the only reason why u don't see anyone actually winning against him is because whoever posts his videos deletes the parts where christians do answer and kick hi ass.
However, You hve not posted a single valid point against the fact that religion does have value.
Once again somone is reading things into my post that i did not say, and arguing against those false things.
I don't have anything AGAINST contraception, and thank you for going through all that trouble to post all those stats.
And couldn't your post have reflected your thoughts on the article itself instead of promoting more prejudice against atheists?
The people who come here to post hateful messages against Islam do not represent USA.
We have criminal and civil law codes, but it's hardly necessary to post up little reminders like «Don't forget, murder is against the law», is it?
That's not true, the Muslims speak out against these attrocities... but the News Media rarely posts anything about it as they have their own agenda.
Also, why doe the Monotheist who professes to believe in nothing but themselves always come on these message boards posting against something they do nt believe in??
Two comments.One, the atheist / materialist claims that he / she... «Did «nt believe in free will»... O.K.Should we take that to mean some mindless, heretofore unknown force apllied those words in your behalf?Did someone put the proverbial «gun to your head «and force you to post your comments?we await you presumably forced answer with bated breath.Two.As for Mr.Gingrich, beware.Politics aside, the one question yet remains for Calista: How did you, a professed «devout «Roman Catholic, carry on a 6 - year affair with a man you knew was married?How does that square with the Biblical prohibition against committing adultery?Oh wait!I know!As a «devout «Roman Catholic you can sin with impunity; just go to your priest, say a couple of «hail Marys and Our Fathers», ask the priest to bless your sinning, and resume.Of course!I had forgetton how easily Catholics excuse their trangressions (ex opere operato, anyone).
These people that are posting this bs against the Bible do nt give a dam about the gays they are atheists or socialists do nt feed the trolls.
No, that is an observation against the moron that does not think but rather posts some tired old video.
I can't wait to see what this generates... Your post would suggest that anybody's spirituality will be just fine so long as they are not «against Christ.»
Out of all the postings on this site today, I found «Derp's «post the most fascinating and informative, as well as deeply revealing.Even after boasting of what seems to be a practically perfect live by any measure, he informs us that he takes pleasure in mocking and ridiculing those of faith who are presumably his opposite; I can only wonder if, given all his supposed accomplishments, he is smart enough to realize how deeply revealing of his true character his remarks are.As a believer, I rarely engage in arguments with my atheist friends, and like to think I wouldn't lower myself to the level of juvenile name - calling and personal attacks against whatever my atheist friends hold dear.Most of the time we simply agree to disagree; when they hold forth with misinformation or ignorance on their assumed «knowledge «of my faith, I try to gently correct them; I certainly don't allow any disagreements we have to devolve into hateful insults and name - calling.
The appealing clause of your stated animosoties against my Word does delegate not to others who may follow my posts to be «TOLD» what to do and / or think young «Dolt».
Most Moving: Kate (Guest Posting at Rage Against the Mini Van) with «Being Gay and Christian» «I want you to know that being gay isn't a lifestyle, but Christianity is.»
And before you reply using «hurt» tones in your post, let me remind you, if you haven't caught on yet, that I am against all the major religions, so it's not really personal in that respect.
That's a distinction most who are posting against Hobby Lobby don't seem to realize or address.
David, I hope you don't mind me observing that your posts seem so much more positive, hopeful and free; as if now you are not having to fight «against» anything, the other parts of your nature are free to assert themselves.
It is impossible to post against something that doesn't exist.
And I have seen you post before against assault rifles and for more gun control, unless I got posters confused, which I don't think I did.
The only thing that bugs me about this guy is that there are more people than not who are teetering on the brink of faith in Jesus, and all this guy does is try to knock people away from faith... This is his word against Gods word, I've been reading these articles they've been posting, and nothing he's said has any biblical foundation whatsoever...
I understand you feel like because i posted on this I am against gays and because im Catholic i have to be «Hard headed» and «Non-reasonable» But I am proud of what i believe, My church doesn't really enjoy the Gothic child in the back of the church professing faith so proudly, they want everyone to be the same.
The sad thing for me is that I know men who, if they saw my post today, would roll their eyes and say it's not true, that this violence against women thing is all a conspiracy theory concocted by militant feminists in order to take over the world.
Christians end up raging against some false notion they don't remotely understand (as is evident in these posts).
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z