Sentences with phrase «n't agree to the contract»

If he won't agree to a contract Arsenal can live with, expect Arsenal to keep Sanchez for the rest of the season and sell him to China in the summer for # 90 million or next January for # 40 million.

The Chargers ultimately chose Manning and traded him to the New York Giants for the fourth selection, North Carolina State quarterback Philip Rivers (who didn't agree to contract terms until Aug. 23).

While claiming that other issues remained unresolved, union officials had said numerous times that they would not agree to a contract without getting the district to make concessions on those two subjects.

Under the terms of the settlement, the three publishers may not agree to contracts with e-book retailers that restrict the retailers» «discretion over e-book pricing,» the court said in a 45 - page opinion last week.

For the next two years, the settling publishers may not agree to contracts with e-book retailers that restrict the retailer's «discretion over e-book pricing,» the court said.

But you still can not remove things in other sites, because those sites didn't agree to the contract.

The parties can not agree to contract out of this duty.

Do not agree to a contract where the Seller has the right of specific performance, as the last thing you would ever want is the seller suing you to try to force you to buy a property that you don't want.

Not exact matches

Streicher agrees, noting that the IUD's entire anatomy has been revised (they used to look like this), and that modern IUDs do not increase the chance of contracting a pelvic inflammatory disease.

In a piece for Fortune, he writes that all information - collection contracts need to be opt - in, and that the company should be forced to serve users even if they don't agree to share their data.

You and we agree that the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods does not apply to your use of our online services or this Terms of Service.

Nokia said on Wednesday a Swedish arbitrator had ruled that «RIM was in breach of contract and is not entitled to manufacture or sell WLAN products without first agreeing royalties with Nokia.»

When hiring freelancers, create a flexible work environment and don't expect each person to agree to full - time contracts.

Establish clear upfront contracts to guide discussions with prospects, and don't be afraid to confront when either party has veered too far from the agreed - upon goals.

To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, you agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Daily Harvest, and our respective past, present and future employees, officers, directors, contractors, consultants, equityholders, suppliers, vendors, service providers, parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, representatives, predecessors, successors and assigns (individually and collectively, the «Daily Harvest Parties»), from and against all actual or alleged Daily Harvest Party or third party claims, damages, awards, judgments, losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, interest, fees, expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys» fees and expenses) and costs (including, without limitation, court costs, costs of settlement and costs of pursuing indemnification and insurance), of every kind and nature whatsoever, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, matured or unmatured, or suspected or unsuspected, in law or equity, whether in tort, contract or otherwise (collectively, «Claims»), including, but not limited to, damages to property or personal injury, that are caused by, arise out of or are related to (a) your use or misuse of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation of these Terms, (e) your violation of the rights of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse of the Sites or Products provided to yoTo the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, you agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Daily Harvest, and our respective past, present and future employees, officers, directors, contractors, consultants, equityholders, suppliers, vendors, service providers, parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, representatives, predecessors, successors and assigns (individually and collectively, the «Daily Harvest Parties»), from and against all actual or alleged Daily Harvest Party or third party claims, damages, awards, judgments, losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, interest, fees, expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys» fees and expenses) and costs (including, without limitation, court costs, costs of settlement and costs of pursuing indemnification and insurance), of every kind and nature whatsoever, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, matured or unmatured, or suspected or unsuspected, in law or equity, whether in tort, contract or otherwise (collectively, «Claims»), including, but not limited to, damages to property or personal injury, that are caused by, arise out of or are related to (a) your use or misuse of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation of these Terms, (e) your violation of the rights of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse of the Sites or Products provided to yoto indemnify, defend and hold harmless Daily Harvest, and our respective past, present and future employees, officers, directors, contractors, consultants, equityholders, suppliers, vendors, service providers, parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, representatives, predecessors, successors and assigns (individually and collectively, the «Daily Harvest Parties»), from and against all actual or alleged Daily Harvest Party or third party claims, damages, awards, judgments, losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, interest, fees, expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys» fees and expenses) and costs (including, without limitation, court costs, costs of settlement and costs of pursuing indemnification and insurance), of every kind and nature whatsoever, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, matured or unmatured, or suspected or unsuspected, in law or equity, whether in tort, contract or otherwise (collectively, «Claims»), including, but not limited to, damages to property or personal injury, that are caused by, arise out of or are related to (a) your use or misuse of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation of these Terms, (e) your violation of the rights of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse of the Sites or Products provided to yoto, damages to property or personal injury, that are caused by, arise out of or are related to (a) your use or misuse of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation of these Terms, (e) your violation of the rights of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse of the Sites or Products provided to yoto property or personal injury, that are caused by, arise out of or are related to (a) your use or misuse of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation of these Terms, (e) your violation of the rights of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse of the Sites or Products provided to yoto (a) your use or misuse of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation of these Terms, (e) your violation of the rights of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse of the Sites or Products provided to yoto you.

In the event that we are not able to resolve a dispute, we each agree that any and all disputes, controversies, or claims arising under, arising out of, or relating in any way to this agreement, or the contractual relationship established by this agreement (whether in contract, tort, or under any statute, regulation, ordinance, or any other source of law) shall be resolved on an individual basis through binding arbitration administered by the American Arbitration Association, in accordance with the American Arbitration Association's rules for arbitration of consumer - related disputes (accessible at https://www.adr.org/aaa/faces/rules)(except that you may assert individual claims in small claims court, if your claims qualify).

In the Russian Far East, Huawei outcompeted Nokia in a 2017 open tender bidding process to lay an internet cable to the Kurile Islands by agreeing to complete the project at a cost that was 9 percent below Rostelecom's stated maximum contract price.122 Though there have been no specific complaints surrounding the Kurile Islands tender, China's investments in Russia at times do not adhere to market principles — an issue of concern for the West given long - standing U.S. and European criticism of unfair Chinese trade and investment practices.

We, our officers and directors, and holders of substantially all of the outstanding shares of our common stock including the selling stockholders, have agreed with the underwriters, subject to certain exceptions, not to offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge, grant any option to purchase, make any short sale or otherwise dispose of any shares of common stock, options or warrants to purchase shares of common stock or securities convertible into, exchangeable for or that represent the right to receive shares of common stock, whether now owned or hereafter acquired, during the period from the date of this prospectus continuing through the date 180 days after the date of this prospectus, except with the prior written consent of each of Goldman, Sachs & Co., Morgan Stanley & Co..

Last year, the city passed a law that requires entities to draw up a written contract with freelancers on work valued at $ 800 or more, and establishes penalties for not paying freelancers on time or not paying them the agreed - on amount.

We require that these Outside Contractors agree to (1) protect the privacy of your personal information consistent with this Privacy Policy, or the Data Protection Amendment and (2) not use or disclose your personal information for any purpose other than providing us with the products or services for which we contracted or as required by law.

You fulfill the terms of the contract by paying for 100 shares of MSFT not at $ 35 per share, but at $ 30 per share — the price you agreed to when you created the contract.

In case it's not, though: remember that agreeing to bi-weekly payments with your lender is contract.

There were no clear explanations for why they could not sign a fiduciary contract and agree to standards of impartial conduct or agree to charge reasonable fees.

The only exceptions to this are those non-Muslims who have a contract with their Muslim overlords, agreeing to pay them money in exchange for not being killed.

The High Contracting Parties, in order to promote international cooperation and to achieve international peace and security by the acceptance of obligations not to resort to war... agree to this Covenant of the League of Nations.

Caveat emptor — read the contract before you sign it — she agreed, wittingly or not, to abide by the condo regulations.

What she signed or agreed to is irrelevant, because a contract that violates Federal law is not legally enforceable.

Whether Christians ought to have agreed to that contract is an interesting historical and theological question, but not really of much significance in our present circumstances» for agree to it Christians did.

If it was payment then we needed to agree on a contract, because I didn't think it was an equal trade.

Among them were pantheism and the positions that human reason is the sole arbiter of truth and falsehood and good and evil; that Christian faith contradicts reason; that Christ is a myth; that philosophy must be treated without reference to supernatural revelation; that every man is free to embrace the religion which, guided by the light of reason, he believes to be true; that Protestantism is another form of the Christian religion in which it is possible to be as pleasing to God as in the Catholic Church; that the civil power can determine the limits within which the Catholic Church may exercise authority; that Roman Pontiffs and Ecumenical Councils have erred in defining matters of faith and morals; that the Church does not have direct or indirect temporal power or the right to invoke force; that in a conflict between Church and State the civil law should prevail; that the civil power has the right to appoint and depose bishops; that the entire direction of public schools in which the youth of Christian states are educated must be by the civil power; that the Church should be separated from the State and the State from the Church; that moral laws do not need divine sanction; that it is permissible to rebel against legitimate princes; that a civil contract may among Christians constitute true marriage; that the Catholic religion should no longer be the religion of the State to the exclusion of all other forms of worship; and «that the Roman Pontiff can and should reconcile himself to and agree with progress, liberalism and modern civilization.»

Where being a Christian is a «contract» with Jesus, one where He pays for our sins if we agree to live for Him and not ourselves.

Unconscionable conduct (agrees with NFF that they have not provided protection and support reforms «to provide transparency in the supply chain» and recognise that «certain classes of suppliers... are predisposed to suffering from a special disadvantage...»; misuse of market power (legal framework must «level the balance of market power in negotiations...», «ensure transparency in the transmission of market prices» and «not allow for final market risks to be borne by the primary producer» and provide «transparency of contract processes» - specifically, Canegrowers supports effects test and a process giving ACCC greater power to «regulate anti-competitive behaviour and impose penalties», shifting «the decisions framework from the judicial system to a regulatory system» which would make it more accessible to small producers); collective bargaining (notes limits of Sugar Industry Act (Qld); authorisation and notification approval costly and limited and not a viable alternative - peak bodies should be able to «commence and progress collective bargaining with mills on behalf of their members» and current threshold too restrictive)» competitive neutrality (mixed outcomes - perverse outcomes in the case of natural monopolies - suggest remove «application of competitive neutrality provisions to natural monopoly essential services»)

There is not much left of «the rest of the season» and worryingly, Oxlade - Chamberlain has still not agreed to extend his contract with the Gunners, and there are many rumours saying that Jurgen Klopp wants to take him up to Liverpool.

If Juventus aren't willing to make an offer in January in a cut - price deal with six months left on Can's contract though, then Liverpool will possibly see that as an opportunity to agree on new terms and sign him to a new deal to extend his stay at Anfield.

With recent Arsenal transfer rumours suggesting that the German has yet to agree to sign a contract extension, will Arsene Wenger need to sign a new striker to persuade Ozil to stay and not see all these chances go to waste?

while I agree he should have never ever have been offered a new contract in the first place I'm pretty certain Stan didn't hold a gun to his head and forced him to sign again.

After Arsenal seemingly agreed to sell another contract rebel, Oxlade - Chamberlain to one of our biggest Premier League rivals, it would now not surprise Arsenal fans if they also decided to cash in on the sale of Sanchez to Man City as their next deal, which will leave very little time for Wenger to bring in replacements...

You don't have to agree that Colt's contract is «worth it».

Sanchez will enter the final 18 months of his contract should terms not be agreed on an extension by January, which could lead to a stressful winter window for us.

There have been reports that the Frenchman has agreed to sign a two year contract extension and there have been reports that he is going to go, but until we hear from the horse's mouth we really don't know.

After two years on loan at Roma, Szczesny must now return to Arsenal, where has still has another two years remaining on his contract, so he would not be allowed to talk to Juventus, or any other club, until a transfer fee is agreed with the Gunners.

He's probably not going to sign until it's already 2015, as his agent, Scott Boras, is never in a rush for this sort of thing unless someone floors his client with a deal that just can't be turned down — think back to Jacoby Ellsbury agreeing to a seven - year, $ 153 million contract with the Yankees in early December of 2013 for an example that sort of thing.

But even though things don't look promising at the moment, midfielder Xabi Alonso believes the two sides will find a way to agree on their difference before the contract runs out in a year.

The former has been told that he will be sold if he doesn't agree a new contract, and is claimed to be open to a move to London.

Aaron Ramsey will be entering the last year of his Arsenal contract in about 10 weeks time, and according to the Welsh international there has been no progress at all, and the Gunners risk losing out on our highest - scoring outfield player in the current squad if a deal isn't agreed before the summer transfer window.

Of course you are dealing with employment laws across different states and different countries and to try to police legally something like that, it was agreed in the room that all the lawyers in the world couldn't come up with a contract to police it.

The Mirror has reported that Dortmund have given Gundogan an ultimatum and if he does not agree to what could be their final contract offer in the next few days, then they are prepared to cash in.

My assumptions are: The Board were looking for a suitable replacement, Either to gradually take the reins from Wenger within two years or to completely replace him at the end of the season, that's if he (Wenger) didn't agree to their terms and Maybe that's why Wenger was delaying the signing of that contract because he didn't want to work with a new assistant manager next season, we now know that the present one is jetting off to manage a club in Turkey at the end of this campaign and after working with Wenger for 19 odd years, this does sound a bit strange, right??

Maybe it isn't mainly the money that is keeping Wilshere and Ramsey from agreeing to new contracts?

The 25 - year - old winger has a contract running until 2016 and while his club value him at # 20m, he will be available to leave for nothing should they not agree to sell beforehand.