Sentences with phrase «n't apply to today»

Clearly this case doesn't apply to today.

But this historical case doesn't apply to today.

This historical case doesn't apply to today.

We can not go around what God says by saying, «Well, our secular laws have now changed so God will have to take into account that fact — therefore, since our secular laws have changed, then God saying a «bishop must be the husband of one wife» — really wouldn't apply to us today.»

So those wouldn't apply to us today.

Is there overwhelming evidence that 1st Corinthians 13:33 - 34 does not apply to us today?

This case does not apply to today because the Medium - Long Term Model foresees neither a significant correction nor a bear market in 2018.

Not exact matches

Applying several layers of security — much like enterprise organizations commonly use today — is not difficult to achieve.

Many lenders today don't require specific forms or types of collateral, but will rather apply a general lien on business assets and a personal guarantee to secure the loan — making it possible for many businesses without specific types of collateral to qualify.

The Federal Reserve can lower interest rates to offset the drag, but not if they're near zero, or in rate - raising mode, both of which conditions apply today.

Other corporate managers - not to mention many of today's investors - might benefit from apply just such a «backwards» process in their own thinking» Marathon Asset Management «Charlie Munger is famous for the pioneering concept of inverting as an investor, of thinking backwards to find one's way to the beginning of an idea or concept.

Then, even though they may apply cultural references to other scripture, they refuse to acknowledge (or at least look at some unbiased research) that loving committed gay or lesbian relationships today do not resemble the types of homosexuality referenced by Paul in Romans or 1 Corinthians.

So to truly apply the mindset of Madison today means to admit what he couldn't quite see: that just as air is to the regrettable existence of fire, and as liberty is to the regrettable existence of faction, so is modern republican government to the regrettable existence of various at - bottom - suicidal democratic mindsets: progressivism, democratic socialism, militant secularism, and libertarianism.

How come testimony and doc - umentation is valid in our court systems today but not when we apply it to the biblical text?

The Civil and Ceremonial laws of the Old Testament and the Abrahamic Covenant applied to a specific people for a specific time, and unless they are ratified in the New Testament under the New Covenant, they are gone, and are not applicable for today.

What even funnier is that he's quoting Leviticus which is the holy code for Israel priests and doesn't really apply to Christians today.

YOU may be a jewish priest, but I am not, and the laws for such ancient priests do not apply to, not are they adhered to by, ANY Christians today.

I could have showed him the cultural reasons why Paul's words don't really apply to us today.

We must apply all our attention to the task, asserts Bonhoeffer, to answer the question «Who Christ really is, for us today» — not merely in the traditional, standardized and ineffectual religious terms, but fully, personally and responsibly.

How can anyone imagine the rules the deity they made up (that doesn't really exist, obviously) all those aeons ago could possibly apply to today's world?

But it is not plausible today unless one refuses to apply even a minimal amount of rational analysis to the story.

And yet, some of the quotes about the law remaining and the law not applying today appear right next to one another (Romans is such an example).

What spoke to me through this story, is how much this pastor knew the people in his church (you and I have the same definition of church, however I'm using the word here as it applies to this group of people I feel the problem in many churches today (and why dialogue during sermons wouldn't go over well) is that the pastors do not take the time to invest in the people they are trying to teach.

One could put the question even more clearly: Why do I not write to my West - German friends today what now would apply to the Russians in the same way that my letter then applied to the Nazis?

We don't even know what some of these laws mean, let alone the story behind them, and even if we did know, this would not mean that we could apply these laws to our situation today.

Pity that so many believers today still cling to an ancient code of morality that doesn't apply very much any more.

That could apply to us today, not just as individuals, but as the whole human family, which is meant to be the family of God.

Justin's perspective here lines up beautifully with the themes of many of the New Testament epistles in which the justification for specific instructions (like head coverings and women remaining silent in church, for example) appear to be rooted in practical considerations regarding love for neighbor, considerations that clearly have a cultural context that may not apply today.

Many of them simply don't believe the Bible's language about immigrants applies to today.

Most people I encounter believe in some form of sign gifts at work today, but they are simply not sure how to apply them.

But this means that we are not to think that a word such as «persons,» applied to Father, Word, and Spirit, can be interpreted in the way in which we today would use that term.

Isn't the point of this post about people who would rather dismiss portions of the Bible because it isn't politically correct or appeasing to the palette, so that same logic should be applied to areas that we are struggling with today?

I can not even begin to answer these questions in a short blog post, so in a Resurrection post later today, I will summarize some of the truths of the resurrection that can be applied to all of these situations.

Just because Jesus said that to one man in the Bible doesn't mean it applies to me today in 2011.

Are you saying that the biblical acceptance of slavery is only applicable to the ancient Hebrew and that the passages allowing and instructing on slavery are null and do not apply today?

However, in these passages, while Jesus reiterates (but does not require) the traditional marriage, he also provides an exception for eunuchs (castrated men — or otherwise impotent men, in today's terms), and allowed them to be married, saying that this law is given to those to whom it applies.

I can not have an intelligent conversation with you regarding the Bible, specifically, for instance, why «not eating shellfish» no longer applies, until you are able to distinguish the difference between being under the Mosaic law and being under Christs grace and what that means for each of us today.

Thankfully, 1 Timothy 2:12 — «I do not permit a woman to assume authority over a man» — continues to be rigidly applied in many churches today without regard to its original context or intended audience.

We can not apply Jeremiah's contrast to our interreligious situation today by saying that non-Christian religions are only telling «dreams» and «the deceit of their own heart.»

In the Christian case specifically (and to some extent the same would apply in theory to the Muslims, though in practice today it would clearly not) it would be felt by some that the comparative religionist would be out of place as a protagonist in any encounter.

The believers understand that these texts, when read literally, do not apply to the issues humanity faces today.

Two years later, we are a little further down the road, but what we said then applies even more urgently today, and not least to the Little Sisters of the Poor.

To try to apply all of Paul's knowledge to today doesn't always fiTo try to apply all of Paul's knowledge to today doesn't always fito apply all of Paul's knowledge to today doesn't always fito today doesn't always fit.

The Court also said «(t) he norms and standards of today require businesses who wish to gain access to the homes of people for extended selling opportunities to exhibit honesty and openness in what they are doing, not to apply deceptive ruses to gain entry».

However, the latest revelation doesn't apply to either player and Arsenal have today been blessed with further good news on the injury front.

Long passed his best years I don't think he is suited to today's game due to his inability to adapt and apply different tactics.

«The nighttime rules that applied 30 years ago just don't apply today, and there's no need to feel uncomfortable about it,» Sears said.

Rabbis differ about whether the laws relating to a meineket still apply today, when babies are usually not dependent on breastfeeding for survival.

When we think of all the horror stories we've been told about what will happen if we don't follow a laundry list of rules about how to raise our children in today's modern, Western society, you can bet that pretty much none of it applied to our early ancestors (or even other cultures today).

But when a mom takes the time to perfectly apply her makeup, makes sure her hair is perfectly coiffed and puts on a non-stained T - shirt and a decent pair of jeans and then takes a selfie with her kids and shares it on Facebook with the caption «I don't hate the way I look today,» it's kind of like a slap in the face to moms who don't have the time or the energy to put in the effort.