Sentences with phrase «n't argue against something»

You may disagree with me, but you you can't argue against something with nothing.

Not exact matches

Fools, you argue against the things of God yet can not see that the word GOD alone carries something greater than the vocable.

What Nye is arguing against is the literal, the - world - was - created - in -6-days-and-is-only-6000-years old, view, not the well - something - had - to - precede - the - big - bang - several - billion - years - ago, view.

Although the judge's decision did not deal with whether or not the sexual abuse actually happened, this latest turn of events is something of a victory for SGM, whose legal strategy has been to first argue that the First Amendment gives pastors the right to discourage victims of abuse from reporting the crimes against them to police and second to argue that the case should be thrown out on technicalities, such as the statute of limitations.

I would say to anyone out there that claims they are not bigoted but merely taking a godly stand against what they believe to be sinful, If you want to honestly examine it, the next time you are going to say something to a homosexual, treat them a certain way, or argue that certain rights should be denied them, ask yourself a few simple questions.

They do not continue to believe something when the evidence argues against their claim.

But I won't argue scripture with someone who doesn't even have a sensible definition of truth and keeps arguing against something with nothing.

In all honesty, the «religious people» that don't legislate against things based solely on their religious convictions and thereby hurt the rights of individuals, and who don't condemn science and medicine and societal progression and other religions and other denominations and people who are not religious, and who don't claim to know that something is true beyond all other truths, are probably a very slim minority, and I'd have to argue that they aren't really religious, they are just doing whatever makes them feel good, which could be accomplished through secular means as well.

You could argue that maybe Wenger doesn't have the personnel to carry out a defensive game plan, but I thought defensively we looked good today, which is something we haven't seen against the better sides in previous games.

This is on what these two are truly arguing; Wenger uses the cup as an example against Neville but Neville isn't really belittling our ability to win games, but rather, that in the long run of a whole season it is more likely for us to drop points due to relying purely on skill which is far more linked to form then something like physicality.

In an interview with Indiewire, the filmmaker was direct about the political implications: «You can get on your soapbox, you can push your political agenda or your religious agenda, against gay marriage, against racial equality, but you can't argue about these people in their home... Equality as a concept isn't something I think we ever achieve, it's something we make progress toward, and hope that we don't slip back and lose any of it.

Against this sort of background, it's perhaps understandable that I should have sided with McKeever, who seemed to offer in his paintings and his writings so much that I couldn't argue with: «In the present climate of all - knowing, self - conscious art, where just about everything is a critique of something or other, there is still the need, even an urgent need, for something as unadorned as (the) simple painting.

So, using GISP2 data to argue against global warming is, well, stupid, or misguided, or misled, or something, but surely not scientifically sensible.

You went off on a completely different tangent, and began arguing against something he hadn't said and which has nothing to do with the poser he sets.

A2: It's debatable whether or not the consequences are dangerous, but it could be very costly and as often as you guys argue against the high costs of transitioning to a sustainable energy future, this should be something you should feel equally about, shouldn't it?

Arguing with someone who is against something without understanding how it is supposed to work is... well... technically you don't have to argue with such a person, because he / she declared defeat already

He also argues forcefully that responsible biochar production ought to start with waste biomass, not plantations specifically designed for the purpose of biochar production — something that was echoed in an inconclusive NRDC report on how much biochar might help in the fight against climate change.

However, the popularity of the Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset is something one can't argue against.