Sentences with phrase «n't asylum applications»

Not exact matches

Christian converts claiming asylum in the UK have been having their applications refused because they can not recite the Ten Commandments, a new report is warnin...

Asylum might be a possibility, but some countries (e.g. the US) will not accept asylum applications from embassies; they must be made from US terrAsylum might be a possibility, but some countries (e.g. the US) will not accept asylum applications from embassies; they must be made from US terrasylum applications from embassies; they must be made from US territory.

These reasons include (i) the fact that South Africa has become the largest recipient of individual asylum - seekers in the world; (ii) asylum being lacking in many respects, and (iii) the huge influx of applications from individuals intent on abusing the asylum management system.29 This is a rationale behind disadvantaging genuine refugees and asylum - seekers from accessing national resources and / or not being afforded effective protection that South Africa committed itself to achieve.30

In answering the third question, the Advocate General takes the view that the authority responsible for examining an application for asylum can not reasonably expect the applicant to renounce his religious activities in order to avoid persecution.

Meanwhile, the Austrian authorities determined that they were not responsible for K's asylum application — she would have to return to Poland to apply for asylum.

Article 3 (2) of the Regulation, the «sovereignty clause», simply provides that a State «may» take responsibility for an asylum application even if it would not otherwise be responsible.

in a manner which guarantees effective access to the procedures for determining refugee status and which does not compromise the objective of the rapid processing of an asylum application.

He did not mince words when he declared that the EU's achievements in formulating and augmenting common standards for asylum applications were in jeopardy as a result of its non-implementation by certain MS.. He also clearly stated that the Commission will not refrain from initiating infringement proceedings against errant MS.

However, though national authorities and courts of all Member States of the EU are still bound by the ECHR and other relevant international law when applying national immigration and asylum law, their scope of application may not reach as far as the Charter would have reached, and at present is regarded as applicable to potential applicants for international protection that have not yet entered the territories of the states bound by them.

When assessing an application for refugee status, the competent authorities can not reasonably expect, in order to avoid the risk of persecution, the applicant for asylum to conceal his homosexuality in his country of origin or to exercise reserve in the expression of his sexual orientation.

She gave five reasons in particular why the scope of the exclusion clause should not be limited to the offenses outlined in Article 1 FDCT: firstly the wording refers to acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the UN and is not limited to terrorist offenses; secondly, such an interpretation would be at odds with the Geneva Convention in light of which the Qualification Directive should be interpreted; thirdly, the Qualification Directive as an instrument of asylum and humanitarian law and the FDCT are qualitatively different and derive from different areas of law; fourthly, it would unduly restrict the application of the exclusion clause and finally, fifthly, the fact that the FDCT is an instrument of variable geometry with varying application across the Union would lead to problems if it were used as criteria in defining terms for the purposes of the application of the Qualification Directive.

It will not apply in applications for emergency funding, cases involving detention under the MHA 1983, asylum and asylum support cases and a few others.

The goals of the agreement between the EU and Turkey on asylum seekers are fine, the text of the deal is in accordance with the law, but its application is currently not in accordance with human rights standards.

The applicant had been detained in a special facility for asylum seekers while awaiting a decision whether or not to allow his application for asylum.

When considering whether or not to grant an application for extension of time for the filing of an appellant's notice where permission to appeal has already been granted by the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (AIT), but the notice of appeal has not been served in time, there should be a presumption that where the AIT has granted permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal the appeal ought to be heard.