Sentences with phrase «n't back either side»

That said, with six clean sheets won out of their last seven at Villa Park, the Villains are definitely a tough nut to crack at home and the 11/4 is sure to appeal to many but I just can't back a side with so much inconsistency.

It is nearly impossible to call this match, as you wouldn't back either side to put in an assured effort to display their ability to dig deep and win when it matters.

I couldn't back either side right now, so the draw was the only option left.

There aren't any back side windows either to help keep cargo secret.

Not exact matches

The contract covers both sides — so we don't get stuck with a last - minute back out, and the contract assures the customer that we do a good job.»

«People didn't want to give the medication back because of the side effect of having erections that were harder, firmer and lasted longer,» Pfizer senior medical director Dr. Brian Klee told the Agence France - Presse.

After all, billionaire money manager Stephen Jarislowsky didn't get rich on the backs of sell - side analysts.

On the flip side, «Saudi Arabia is losing its crown as its selling prices in Asia haven't been attractive enough,» Gao Jian, an analyst at SCI International, a Shandong - based energy consultant, told Bloomberg back in June.

If you are on the «not» side, either engage in some market - product fit research or go back to the drawing board and use what you've learned to perfect your product.

Reviewers go back and forth about the assembly process, with some saying it's on the easy side — one reviewer says it took about one to two hours — and others claiming it's more difficult, such as this buyer whose review is entitled «not fun to assemble.»

On the flip side, if you're giving the power back to your customers to control their own data (with respect to their engagements with you), then you are being given permission to provide incredible customer experiences for your best customers; this is the very thing that will allow you to not only survive but also thrive in this next wave of digital marketing.

While handling the back side of a campaign might not be as thrilling as dealing with the fund - raising part, these activities play a vital function in getting a fledgling business off the ground.

«We don't see suddenly reverting back until there is substantial policy change on the monetary policy side.»

If in 60 days I decided I didn't want to continue the side business, I could get my money back on my initial investment with no penalty.

She went on to suggest a «trade timeout»: «I have put forward a very specific plan about what I would do, and it does include telling Canada and Mexico that we will opt out unless we renegotiate the core labor and environmental standards — not side agreements, but core agreements; that we will enhance the enforcement mechanism» ¦» Obama backed her up.

It's really a lifelong habit you need to acquire in order to not get back to the messy side of debt again.

The idea of having side income to fall back on is tempting, but I'm not sure whether it's the best use of my time.

Not only is Carl Icahn not sniffing around Glencore's back - side, he's issued a statement today which indicates he's going to take his chips off the table and find a different game to plNot only is Carl Icahn not sniffing around Glencore's back - side, he's issued a statement today which indicates he's going to take his chips off the table and find a different game to plnot sniffing around Glencore's back - side, he's issued a statement today which indicates he's going to take his chips off the table and find a different game to play.

The magnetic charging port retains the two - point design of the Pebble Steel, so cables for the original Pebble won't work, but it now resides on the back instead of the side.

If you are fortunate enough to be given money that you don't have to pay back, make sure you consult with your CPA and that your friends and family consult with theirs, as there can be tax implications on both sides of the transaction.

If you have ever read the disclaimers at the back of every report published by a sell - side research firm, you need not read further.

On the good side, members earn money back everywhere (at the pump, while dining, etc.) and not just at Costco locations.

I need to get Monevator back on track on that side of things, as I am definitely not in the scrimp and save and skip every last latte school of thought.

Nevertheless, recent price action in the stock market has not yet convincingly confirmed the balance of power has shifted back to the bears, so we are a bit cautious about aggressively jumping in the short side of the market just yet.

Just as a side note, it is not the first bitcoin ATM in Turkey, there was one back in early days of bitcoin ATM industry (I think back in 2013) installed at one of airports https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8lpjYtsoW4

On the flip side, if the market does not break down in the next week or so the weekly MACD will likely flip back to the positive side.

The latest, Startup Act 2.0, is backed by both sides of the aisle (not to mention Silicon Valley).

Now it is but not back then (and the people on the young earth creationism side are back then).

Change can only come about through agreement, not by kicking people in the back side because we think we have bigger boots.

You called me out as being disingenuous when I said «that as time goes on however, I'm finding things that are helping to disprove things previously held as fact among Christians», so I have provided you an example that not only wasn't it a disingenuous statement, but that I've done my homework, on both sides of the argument, and came up with something that no one has been able to give me a response with even either the slightest chance of being possible, or falling back to the old status qua of «mysterious ways» and «having faith».

How do we know that «fuck off back to sodom» won't be said to Julie by somebody else who doesn't like her side of the story.

They call me the King of Darkness, when I offer you no pain Why would they label me heartless, when your love is my cocaine And your soul is my Rogaine, I have a thirst to know your brain When you enter my domain got ta take this number for your name But you don't have to drink cyanide, I'm gonna be right by ya side If we got ta take that riot ride, on the enemy and defy your side Fight for the place we're building, for the reproduction of more children Trying to get that number back around 6 billion, I'm gonna rule until then Founded this colony like a pilgrim, anybody try to penetrate this section or threaten we KILL THEM

I think people get pulled into these arguments... how many times did the Pharisees seek to get Jesus to commit to» one side or the other» and he would come back at them from a place they were not expecting.

These fears are not so different from the fear I see in the eyes of protestors carrying signs that depict President Obama as Hitler, the fear I see in the red faces of angry preachers urging their parishioners to «take America back for God,» the fear I detect in some of the books against emerging church, the fear I detect in some of the books in support of the emerging church, the fear I hear in the voices of both gays and the conservative evangelical activists who lobby against them when both sides consider for just a second the possibility that maybe they have it wrong.

And looking back, I can certainly attest that I am not the same person I was several years ago as I sat in the doctor's office discussing different side effects of antidepressants.

whats funny to me is i don't know anyone 5 thousand years old to back up theist and i don't recall knowing anyone over billions of years old to back up atheists, yet both sides know there right.

I think it's time for people both inside and outside the religion to take a step back and question what's really going on, if it's okay or not and what we can do to protect the rights of both sides.

Unlike conventional war, it obviously does not mean that the other nation's tanks are back on their side of the border.

I wonder, if any of them ever saw an actual roadrunner dead on the side of the road, how many of them wouldn't automatically reject the idea that it was just hit by a car for some bipedal coyote dropping an anvil while flying overhead with an ACME rocket strapped to his back?

So stop doing that and it will be possible again» (of course you can't repent while you're in the middle of siding with Christ's enemies by taking refuge in the their tents — whether it be by going back to the Law for the Jews, or going back into a life of sin.

I say unto you reader of faith, are you willing to take a leap into a light so bright, you would not know what was on the other side, or would you rather recluse yourself back into your dark shadows of life?

It seems that they are still in many ways still emotionally and mentally back living in that era where both sides put people to death for not sharing their own beliefs.

And others on my side couldn't understand why you were going back into the old ways, when God was moving as a fresh wind, beyond boundaries and walls.

These two cataclysmic conflagrations of our century, which broke the back of the liberal Protestant faith in progress, do not appear to trouble the adherents of Divine Principle, by and large members of a generation conveniently undistressed by stark memories of those «triumphs» for the heavenly side.

Thoughtful, reflective persons are on the near side of this great modern divide, and I don't think they can go back to premodern ways of thinking, about values as well as religion (any more than they can go back to thinking that the world is flat or lies at the center of the universe).

And the people keep coming every sunday for that little spiritual hit, that pat on the back and the message they want to hear «You are special, any bad deeds weren't your fault as you can blame them on Satan, and you get to live for eternity at the universal creators side, all for just a fiver...»

The moderates have stood up and fought back but unfortunately this usually ends in bloodshed for both sides and it does not help one bit to stop radicals from their agenda.

Disappointment with the results of social planning should not send us back into a one - sided emphasis on the freedom of the individual.

There is such a depth to the vitrol that goes back and forth between republicans and democrats that it just doesn't seem possible the two sides will ever agree on anything substantial.

All too often we experience the two sides of this coin as distinct, and all too easily we fall back into an eros that is not (yet) agape.