Sentences with phrase «n't back up a statement»

Watch out for: The optimist who tells you that everything is going to go viral, or who claims that something's viral but can't back up the statement with numbers.

The figures are extremely out of date, and do not back up the statements made.

I didn't catch in time to actually check any notes I had aganist the profiles on site, so can't say for certain but it appeared that they had listed some members as basic / featured members but after contact with them and going back to the members user name in my buddies list and sent mail lists on site that evenone in all my lists was now listed as an online cupid So I can't back up my statement with hard facts I know I had coontact with members on first contact were listed as basic or featured.

If you can not back up your statements with references to specific sources, the value of your law dissertation is equal to zero!

That certainly happened with Lomborg, who accused the group of acting as «opinion police» when one of the annotators didn't back up a statement with facts — which then prompted a long response from Vincent in the comments section of Forbes.

Not exact matches

Trump makes statements, whether it's about the size of his inaugural crowd or Obama wiretapped him or what have you, that just don't get backed up.

But I won't hold my breath ---- cause all you emergents makes statements like the above with only your opinion to back it up.

That's blatantly false and he did not back that statement up.

Those statements are not backed up in the bible and are added by you.

Of course God isn't interested in my opinion or in yours, since this subject isn't even in the bible and you have to prove God exist as well to back that statement up.

You called me out as being disingenuous when I said «that as time goes on however, I'm finding things that are helping to disprove things previously held as fact among Christians», so I have provided you an example that not only wasn't it a disingenuous statement, but that I've done my homework, on both sides of the argument, and came up with something that no one has been able to give me a response with even either the slightest chance of being possible, or falling back to the old status qua of «mysterious ways» and «having faith».

If you look at chapter 2 He states «the day you eat you shall die» I do not think the Lord would ever make such a strong statement without backing it up.

I say unless you can back up a law with facts and logical statements then it shouldn't be considered in a democracy.

You didn't actually provide any proof to back up your statements as to where the whole concept of hell such as showing the Greek conecpts actually derived their belief from the Egyptians or showing how they were all derived from Persia as opposed to there could not be any chance whatsoever that there was any independant invention.

if one wanted to be a troll, one would turn that very statement against you: Why make statements about what / who created man or which religion is correct when you can't back them up with proof?

Jordan - «Please don't become like this Crossan fellow making outlandish statements you can't back up.»

@Franklin Why post a statement like that if you are not willing to back it up?

This is combined with an alarming tendency to make sweeping statements such as; «New Testament scholars sometimes say that the Gospel accounts of the appearances of the risen Christ are false and his followers did not intentionally claim to be eye - witnesses to his resurrection», without references to back it up.

He throws out nice sounding statements, but when challenged doesn't back them up.

We need to invent a new word for people willing to believe the writings of unknown authors, of unknown origin, of an unknown but ancient time, which is badly worded, internally AND externally (with modern science) inconsistent, full of statements with no actual arguments to back them up, with the only decently educated people to back it all up are theologians who twist the meaning of words and commit logical fallacies and still only try to prove that SOMETHING must exist, not that christianity is the truth.

You don't have a single shred of evidence to back up that statement.

You can not extrapolate your experience to the many unless you have reputable studies to back that statement up.

FYI, I don't have any data to back up that last statement; it just sounded like a good sound bite.

In all honesty, there is not a single product or recipe out there that you can't recreate at home using whole foods and natural sweeteners that come packaged up with other goodies like vitamins, minerals and fibre (will this statement come back to bite me?!

Our player of the season so far?Certainly the most consistent.JACK AND OZIL CONTRACTS - just get them signed up for F *** S SAKE.Jack doesn't want to go anywhere and Ozil will have his choice of big clubs to choose from if allowed to be able to go on a free.How about giving out a statement of our ambitions (yeah right) and show were prepared to pay whatever it takes (up to the point of being ridiculous) to SIGN the best and KEEP the best» These two are the best we have so get them sorted early to send out a message of how serious we intend to be.AUBAMEYANG - So what if he has a contract.So did Sanchez.Offer the right money to Dortmund and the player and he will be ours.What is there to question over this deal?He is a proven goalscorer.We have just lost one.Get the deal done.GIROUD - Get rid of him to Dortmund if they want him either by selling or if it sweetens the deal just loan him till the end of the season.He was a back up when Sanchez was here and will be on the mix of back ups if Auba signs.He has a World Cup squad to fight for just to be considered so needs to be playing every week.We do not need him if Auba signs and would demand better than him if the deal fails to happen.Just get rid.JONNY EVANS - I'm not sure.Agree Kos needs nursing through games and we do not have consistent performers to come in if he is injured or rested mainly due to both Chambers and Holdimg not progressing through as much as we first thought and hoped for.Gooners have always been patient and supportive of the youngsters as they have come through but question marks to the whole coaching staff as to why these two seem to have stalled as much as they have done.Steve Bould - What do you do?You should be ashamed.

His subsequent statement to the press that he «went two yards further back» kicked off a Saturday morning of fevered activity that ended up with the committee investigating Woods» actions and eventually assessing a two - shot penalty but not a DQ.

talk about skewing the stats to fit your own conclusions... this is like a slap in the face to every real Arsenal fan... have you no shame, have you no dignity, have you no sense of right from wrong... if you think everything was so well orchestrated why is everyone and their brother laughing at the way in which we conduct business both on and off the field... either you're a paid hack or a delusional buffoon... regardless you can't be a genuine Arsenal fan because the difficulties facing this club having been going on for years and this latest episode in our pathetic recent history is but a glaring reminder of how far we have fallen... I'm not going to waste my time discrediting every single ridiculous statement you made in your love letter to Wenger, but if you write another article I will gladly expose you for the fraud you truly are... this club is in desperate need of a serious cleansing and for you to try and package this dog and pony show as a well - oiled machine is a direct insult to anyone who has supported this team during the supposed «lean» years... the deceptive and disrespectful manner in which this organization has treated it's fans is an abomination to supporters everywhere and for you to even try to justify their actions is akin to saying just shut - up and keep filling our pockets... so please crawl back under whatever stone you crawled out from under and think carefully before you spew this type of propaganda ever again

Go to uefa.com before making bold statements, I agree we don't have a world class striker like Messi, Ronaldo, lewandowski and ibrahimovic, but also bayern aside none of them have a world class keeper like cech, certainly none of them have a back up as good as ospina.

I have written before here about the shocking statement that the board have no clue unless Wenger has an idea and if not they wait for him to come with a plan (which they will back up).

They didn't look motivated in the first half — a statement backed up by Bellerin who came out and said the manager gave them the hairdryer treatment at half time.

Picture this, we don't come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned in full flight... if these things were to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger to recant his earlier statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts of comments from Wenger which are often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight in salt make such a definitive statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking point considering how many times his own words have come back to bite him in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think, in fact he's more than slightly infuriated by the very idea of having to answer to the likes of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand of football and success felt like a forgone conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team of ore... whereas in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager, in recent times those words have been replaced by a myriad of excuses, a plethora of infuriating stories about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed as outright fabrications... it's kind of funny that when we want some answers, like during the whole contract debacle of last season, we can't get an intelligent word out of him, but when we just what him to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem to get him to shut - up... I beg you to prove me wrong Arsene

Anyone can make a statement but you need to back it up, Even with Sanchez we are not strong enough to win the league or even challenge, We need more top players, At the moment we have spent around 40 mil on transfers, Where is the so called warchest.

Back up your statements with fact not hearsay.

How does that decisive statement square up with the rumoured bids for Lemar when it seems Arsenal have been told he is not for sale, and yet we appear to have been going back with increased offers in trying to acquire him.

But hold you hard, because that goody - two - shoes statement did not square up with the rumoured bids for Lemar, for example, when it seems Arsenal were told he was not for sale, and yet we appear to have gone back to his club with incrementally increasing offers in trying to acquire the player.

Also, if we are saying that only money will win you the league then it is indeed sad and it reminds me of what I said a while back where if FFP is not effective, we may as well dispense with playing the 38 matches in a season and just get the club treasurers of each of the 20 clubs to turn up at the beginning of the season with a copy of the clubs latest bank statement.

The Brazilian was up against Nigerian forward Onyekuru who is on loan to the Belgian side from Everton, and in his statement Alves said he didn't attack much in the first half because they needed to keep it tight at the back.

You don't cite any studies or research to back up your statements, just your observations, but let's examine a few of your reasons anyway.

I wrote a an entire page for a response and will post the link here when it is published on their website, but for now I will just share with you a portion of what I wrote in reply...» This statement about breastfeeding is not only incorrect with absolutely no evidenced based research to back it up, but can be harmful t to a mum's breastmilk supply and her baby.

They assume, and present their statements, as if they are backed up by systematic studies that prove that parents are not intelligent nor capable enough to take care of the sleep environment within which they «co-sleep» and that during sleep parents all become insensitive to their infants need, and are incapable of responding to their infants needs or conditions when scientific studies published in the best medical scientific journals contradict and refute their claims.

He came under fire when he backed that initial statement up with information obtained from COMIDA, info that wasn't actually delivered to I - Square developers Mike and Wendy Nolan until Monday afternoon.

The statement «people must be able to figure out what has worked for them and what hasn't» is just not true nor backed up with voting patterns.

It was not, it's fair to say, universally welcomed by Labour supporters and there was particular criticism of it being backed up with a couple of poll questions showing people agreed with a statement «We must live within our means so cutting the deficit is the top priority».

If you know Schreibman then you know he has made lots of statements and has not backed them up with action.

While she declared herself «proud» to be backing the bill, she made that statement in a release dumped late the evening before Thanksgiving, the text of the substantially revised bill was not immediately available, and the meeting of the Public Safety Committee on December 4 that took up the bill was not announced until the day before.

Tarfia please do not make assumptions about my knowledge base and, if possible, try and base your statements with evidence rather than opinion and what you think — take a leaf out of John Ps responses — he gives us some figures to back up his claims — for example — how do you know how many people occupy the centre ground — what evidence have you got.

He doesn't have to back up his statements about Cuomo because as discussed — the issues are more important — however the doubt will linger.

He would not provide any documentation to back up his statement.

The councilman, a leader in the Council's de Blasio - aligned Progressive Caucus, declined to back up Mr. Cruz's or Mr. Talen's statements and argued that increased NYPD attention to the homeless was a reaction to the increased population — not a reflection on the leadership of the mayor or the commissioner.

I don't have any research to cite that backs that statement up, but I've worked with thousands of people and consistently found it to be the case.