Sentences with phrase «n't back up your assertion»

Some of the ideas are vague; a simple «all colleges will offer free tuition» doesn't back up the assertion with to whom, or how it would be paid for.

Not exact matches

And yet again, believers make assertions they can not back up!

Considering the entirety of your posts are assertions with absolutely no evidence to back it up, qualifying anything you said would merely be giving it an amount of time it doesn't deserve.

And, hey, wouldn't you know it, the numbers back this assertion up.

Mahoney did not provide numbers to back up that assertion.

This would involve destroying records that could lead the trustee to property you haven't disclosed or simply not being able to back up assertions about your finances contained in your bankruptcy schedules.

The statistical revolutions that have overtaken sports, business and markets have bred suspicion of any observation or assertion not backed up by hard numbers.

At the end of the day, the key to success for independent retailers in the natural category is not only identifying themselves as natural or holistic pet stores, but also backing that assertion up with a well - designed marketing and merchandising strategy.

Encounters are not only exhilarating for people who participate, but are positively enriching for the animals as well — an assertion backed up by science.

With certain characters (who shall remain nameless to avoid spoilers), you can even push them too far with your questioning and result in them refusing to cooperate, similar to L.A. Noire (though in Aviary Attorney this is not dependent on whether you have evidence to back up your assertions; you can simply frighten away characters by being too forceful).

What I have said is that your assertion that some unspecified geoengineering scheme or schemes «CAN» — and that was your word, «CAN», not «conceivably might» or «possibly could», but «CAN» — control the Earth's temperature as accurately and reliably as a simple elecromechanical on / off thermostat controls a furnace, has no evidence whatsoever to back it up.

You can't do that by reading op - ed pieces or blogs that don't provide references to the science that backs up their assertions.

Answering of continually answering my question with a question why don't you merely back up your assertions by pointing me to some studies that could tell all of us on this forum what temperature reduction could be expected by the aggressive mitigation measures proposed.

You ostensibly believe CO2 dominates despite not having the requisite scientific evidence to back up that assertion, not to mention paleoclimate data which heartily contradicts it (i.e., CO2 levels rose while ocean heat content declined, or OHC rose rapidly while CO2 levels were constant).

Here's what is required (leaving aside Theresa May's electorally hamstrung inability to deliver much of it): The entire cabinet and every business leader the government's black book can muster, on stage for the launch of the new strategy; an explicit declaration that this, full decarbonization of the economy, is the post-Brexit economic strategy; clear and attractive retail policies, such as a diesel scrappage scheme, tax breaks for green investment, new apprenticeships, a green home building program; an open invitation to all opposition party leaders to share a platform to support the plan with a declaration that while they may not agree on every component they fully endorse the over-arching goal; a willingness to shame those party leaders who play party politics and refuse to turn up; a fortnight - long program where each day sees a new cabinet member explain how the plan will transform parts of the economy; a Royal Commission on the flaws of GDP as an economic measure and the viability of alternative quality of life metrics; and, yes, a brave assertion that carbon intensive industries will have to transform or be scaled back, backed by a decarbonization adaptation fund to help affected communities respond to this global trend.

However, the IPCC's assertions not withstanding, this claim is not currently backed up by an auditable and tightly organized foundation of reference information and knowledge — viewed either from a narrow QA Audit perspective, or from a broader Internal Audit perspective.

In this particular area of climate change, many of the assertions made by respectable scientists in peer reviewed literature are not backed up by archived data, code and other materials, and long legal battles have been fought to get those essential pieces of information put out for scrutiny.

And if you've got X number of factors (a, b, c, d,...) in an equation (the full equation for the tree - ring widths or densities), then try to assert that b (temperature) is the one that you can nail to a high precision as a cause, in just such and such a linear correlation, you'd better be ready to back up your assertion with the exact reason why the other factors did not affect the linearity.

A little while back I wrote about a planned 8,100 cow mega-dairy, and followed up on a spokesperson's astounding assertion that «cows do not belong in fields.»

Martin looked at the importance of process improvement and the use of relevant technology that can help you to create efficiencies, with the advice «don't be the last department head who's not able to show up with hard data backing up your assertions as to how the business is running or how it needs to evolve.»

However, Windsor didn't cite any Google sources or inside information to back up his assertion.

It's more challenging to prove your value when you don't have a series of professional accomplishments to back up your assertions.

Don't forget to use the CREA ads to back up your assertions!