Sentences with phrase «n't bail out the bank»

The U.S. government insisted that it wouldn't bail out the banks, but no one believed it, so outfits such as Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. carried on as if they had little to lose.

Not exact matches

Some banks weren't able to lend for a while because of TARP,» Geshwiler says, referring to the Troubled Asset Relief Program, the federal government's program for bailing out banks hit hard in the financial crisis.

The problem isn't Deutsche Bank in his mind, though — it's other banks in a similar position that don't have countries like Germany to bail them out.

Such an arrangement, known as private - sector involvement, or P.S.I., has been pushed by Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany as a way of forcing banks, not only European taxpayers, to foot the bill for bailing out Greece.

(c. 21:53) «In America, President Obama and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, say the economy can not survive without bailing out the banks, without bailing out the debt, without making the gamblers and the cleptocrats whole on what they have taken.

If a too - big - to - fail bank got into trouble, she wrote, the F.D.I.C. would wind it down, not bail it out.

After all, we were told at the time that if taxpayers didn't open their wallets and bail out the banks, we could face a complete meltdown of the global financial system and an economic fate rivaling the Great -LSB-...]

«Why can we find millions for tax cuts and bank bail outs and not enough for kids?»

«The consortium of 40 + banks (known as R3cev) which aims to do just that will inevitably develop something which: is permissioned (for users and developers like the apple app store), privatized, has fees, will not be entirely transparent to everyone, will not be open - source, it will definitely be inflationary to accommodate monetary policy of debasement and fractional reserve schemes, it will facilitate negative interest rates, central control of accounts for suspension / freezing of funds, bail - ins, bail outs, capital controls and transactions will include the identity of both sender and receiver and store that information in a centralized location for the convenience of hackers.»

Also, US President Obama and Treasury Secretary Geithner also told Angela Merkel that US banks had made big bets — derivative gambles — that Greece would pay its bondholders, and threatened to hurt European banks if they did not pressure the IMF to bail out Greece.

But Fed officials weren't ready for the unprecedented steps, such as bailing out the giant insurer, American International Group Inc., that they soon would be taking in a tumultuous year that transformed the central bank from obscure guardian of interest rates to aggressive fighter of financial crises.

And we certainly don't trust banks or enjoy bailing them out.

Banks were bailed out in full following the crisis, and now that they are worried about loaning into this market and holding loans on their books, referring to loans which would not be guaranteed by either of the GSE's.

Now, governments aren't allowed to step in and bail them out, and I think that wounding down a big bank is absolutely politically toxic for any leader so faced with that choice, most leaders would just break the rules and completely undermine the banking union and that in itself could spark off bank runs as well.

And the governments don't want to have to bail those guys out like they had to bailout the banks back in the first financial crisis.

(figures from Market Ticker) Doesn't this suggest that the Fed is just about out of firepower when it comes to bailing out the struggling banking system?

He credits the Fed with seeking to «create jobs,» not mainly to bail out banks that hold mortgages on properties in negative equity.

Spain's neighbors are rescuing the country's banks, but the government itself was not bailed out and bond investors are not satisfied.

so you have a bunch of fake Christians with a non profit / no tax paying cathedral going bankrupt, and another bunch of pagan laced above the law non tax paying ped protecting catholics buying a cathedral (notice i did nt say Christian), from a bailed out by taxpayers bank....

sorry this is a bit of the subject does anyone know what the situation with our overall debt is at the moment and what our repayments are i was under the impression that we are at about the # 245 million mark gross debt and about # 97 net debt are the stadium repayments lower now or something is the bonds interest dropped lower inprice we were paying something like # 20 - # 30 million in repayments but heard its down to about # 15 million per yr now i know we will have broken throught the # 300 million mark in revenue now i am guessing that contributes more to the transfer funds or if not what makes up the transfer funds in the club i.e deals or match day revenue plus cash in the bank which stands at a high level but must be just in case we might default on a payment we need heavy cash in hand to bail us out this side of the club really intrigues me as it is not a much talked about subject unless you are into that type of area of work or care about the general fianacial outcome of the club does anyone have more insight into our finances would be great to hear from anyone about this matter cheers gonerwineverything (because we are)

He was opposed to bank bail - outs, he's against HS2 — even though it's not planned to go through his Buckinghamshire constituency — and he voted against gay marriage.

If the banks are being bailed out I don't see why the government couldn't insist on something like this.

Those responsible for the banking scandals that necessitated a bail - out from the Troika have not yet been...

It wasn't cutting spending that brought this situation about, it was bailing out the Irish bank's debtors at the insistence of the ECB.

I personally would ask «why did the government bail out all of those banks» rather than «why didn't the government bail out Lehman.»

In the Great Depression there were certain Jewish Banks (Bank of United States) that didn't get the same bail out treatment as others.

The United States not only bailed out some of its banks, but also AIG, a non-bank which was deemed to be «systemically important».

Open Europe, the Eurosceptic thinktank, also gave only a qualified approval: «Those outside the eurozone and banking union should not be discriminated against, will not participate in eurozone bail - outs and can keep their own financial supervision macro pro prudential regulation.»

Fast forward to 2008, a year in which he says «even Ronald Reagan couldn't have gotten elected» and the $ 700 billion bank bail - out was on the horizon.

Pick a leader who will not only bail out banks and airlines, but also families from losing their homes — or jobs due to their companies moving to other countries.

Some will bail out banks, which will invest in safe instruments in areas of the economy not under threat.

From Michael Sesit at Bloomberg, there are four things for the central banks to do in order to avert the crises: The world's major central banks face four challenges as they strive to prevent the global financial system from unraveling and growth from stagnating: Acting in a concerted manner; improving transparency; deciding who gets bailed out and who doesn't; and making sure whatever monetary medicine is administered doesn't come with destabilizing side effects.

Think of the bailing out of money market funds and SIVs (not the Super-SIV, which I said was unlikely to work), or the Sovereign Wealth Fund investments in some of the investment banks.

But central banks prolong cycles by bailing out marginal ideas and not letting them purge, also creating a culture where risk is not respected, because the central bank will ride to the rescue.

As an example, just because the banks were bailed out last time does not mean that it will happen next time.

Unlike their wealthier counterparts in the top quintile, they won't have the liquid assets required to bail them out if the banks start calling in their debts.

If the Greeks and other fringe members of the Eurozone default, and the core governments don't bail the situation out, those holding CP of core Eurozone banks may take a loss.

If not, let them fail, and bail out your own banks, which is cheaper than bailing out the fringe.

Just to add that a train wreck at UBS would be the responsibility of the Swiss, not the Americans — have the Swiss ever bailed out a bank with public funds before?

Personally I don't know how these banks get away with raping the people who bailed them out.

Where possible, always keep your cash within the # 85,000 limit, as it's an aim but not a promise to bail out banks that fail.

Bank shareholders should bail out, not taxpayers.

He has argued that failed banks should not be bailed out, Lehman's collapse was not a disaster, AIG should be declared bankrupt, that naked short selling is not a problem, that backdating isn't so bad, insider trading should be legal, many corporate CEOs are underpaid, global solutions are worse than local solutions, Warren Buffett is overrated, Michael Milken is a great American, the collapse of the hedge fund was not a scandal, hedge funds are over-regulated, education is overrated by the educated, bonuses at successful Wall Street's firms are deserved and possibly undersized, management buyouts are boons to the economy, Enron's management was victimized by an over-zealous prosecution, Sarbanes - Oxley should be repealed, corporate compliance culture is a disaster, shareholder democracy is overrated, hostile takeovers ought to be revived, the market is permanently moving away from public ownership of equity in corporations, private partnerships are on the rise, public ignorance is encouraged and manipulated by governments and corporations, experts overrate expertise, regulatory agencies are controlled by the businesses they supposedly regulate and Wall Street is much more fun than people give it credit for.

Instead, they use their high - quality balance sheet to bail out the liquidity problems of banks, broker - dealers, and maybe others, all while not expanding high powered money.

Now, part of this stems from a false belief system, thinking that we had to bail out the banks — we didn't need to bail out the banks.

ETF for India, China, Vietnam, etc.)-- Vanguard is good; I am in process of replacing the TD eFunds with Vanguard ETFs (I should have done it much earlier but they were under in my RRSP, it should have not mattered, the corresponding ETFs were low too)-- Big companies are good (McDonalds, Starbucks, Pfizer, WM) until they are not so perhaps I should get rid of them and buy more Vanguard ETFs — Buying distressed companies could be a winning proposition but have I very mixed results so better not (BP and Transocean bought after the oil spill, Nortel, BlackBerry, and Nokia — BP and NOKIA good, Transocean under not much, but under, BB very, very bad, and Nortel no comments)-- Berkshire is very good as it is a kind of ETF but what would happen after Warren Buffett (who would have thought AIG would need to be bailed out and the shareholders wiped out in the process or other cases where individuals brought companies down for example Barings the oldest bank in England)

Did you know that not one single bank in Belize went bankrupt or required a government bail - out during the worst of the Great Recession?

This is not a bail out, like the Banks.

The country's banks did not require bailing out; the Canadian dollar is trading at record levels, and the country's pension funds — such as Stikeman Elliott client the Ontario Teachers» Pension Plan — are aggressively buying assets abroad.

Now, the Blade reports, «members of like - minded organizations» are camped out in Sadler's yard carrying signs saying things like, «Bail out people not banks.»