Sentences with phrase «n't be less of a problem»

Not exact matches

It doesn't imply that any particular CEO isn't worth the money, and it doesn't imply that any particular board is obligated to do the impossible, namely to «fix» the big problem of social inequity by paying its own CEO less.

It didn't everywhere Lots of places in the US you can buy a great house for less than it sold for in 2000 The only problem is either the taxes are too high or the job market is terrible Take the Raleigh / Durham area in NC Housing market is good but go a half hour outside the triangle area and there are lots of inexpensive homes available

[158] Other causes include the rise in non-cash benefits as a share of worker compensation (which aren't counted in CPS income data), immigrants entering the labor force, statistical distortions including the use of different inflation adjusters by the BLS and CPS, productivity gains being skewed toward less labor - intensive sectors, income shifting from labor to capital, a skill gap - driven wage disparity, productivity being falsely inflated by hidden technology - driven depreciation increases and import price measurement problems, and / or a natural period of adjustment following an income surge during aberrational postwar circumstances.

If the reason banks fail is because free markets in banking don't work, how do you explain the lack of the problems you claim plague free markets in the much less regulated pre-1934 Canadian banking industry?

So if we started to get inflation that's going to create a real problem for the central banks because they won't be able to emit in the quantities of currency they've been emitting because that will fuel inflation and inflation of course destroys capital, it destroys the savings, it destroys the purchasing power of wages and people actually have less money to spend, less purchasing power.

In The Road Less Travelled, M Scott Peck explains how a lot of us flee from the pain of solving problems and end up either neurotic or with character disorders (i.e. the neurotic assumes too much responsability and the person with a character disorder not enough).

Patriarchae, my point is that Pastor Jeffers» comments about Mormonism perfectly exemplifies the main problem with the hundreds upon hundreds upon hundreds of Protestant denominations (most of whom can not agree on the time of day much less matters theological).

thought that an action will become less ethical the more «medical» it is, and medical problems of morality might be regarded as a sign that objectivity has not yet been carried far enough.

(Far less, of course, can we explain the fact that similar prayers did not stay the tornadoes that killed 50 people in Wichita Falls, Texas, a few months later — but that is a different problem.)

Even less did it take account of the till longer predisposing factors for which the U.S. is more to blame than Saddam Hussein: the decade spent competing with the U.S.S.R. in building up Hussein's forces, and the explicit statements made in July to the effect that what Hussein might choose to do with border problems was not our concern.

First: abortion performed due to r ape and health reasons of the mother TOTAL less than 5 % Second: The medical profession today makes evaluations balancing the rights of mom and child in problem pregnancies where abortion is not a legal option.

Cavanaugh's More of Jesus, Less of Me makes a similar point: «Those of us who hunger for more than we need, for more than is good for us, have another hunger: we have emotional problems that we have not exposed to the healing of our Lord Jesus... But there is good news: the Holy Spirit can heal these unnamed hungers.»

Given Barr's own observation elsewhere in the volume under review that «the theology of the Old Testament is not the same as the theology of the New,» one would have anticipated a more sympathetic and less emotional response to my posing the problem and suggesting a way forward.

Franklin may allow himself a few more slips or a little less guilt about the slips than Mather did but what Lawrence called the «barbed - wire of shalt - not ideals» is still up.10 Though now we can not tell for sure whether virtue is pursued for its own good or for the public seeming of good («Honesty is the best policy» clearly illustrates the problem) the impulse life is still tightly reined in.

I had entered the fourth phase of survivorship, which was characterized perhaps less by the health problems themselves than by the fact that my maladies were not properly ascribed to a post-concentration-camp syndrome.

Students can not solve this moral problem on their own, Rittelmeyer admits, but Yale can't be part of the solution, much less a leader.

There are just too many Muslims who take their freakin» koran literally... and too many other «not - muslim - enough» muslims who couldn't care less about the violence done in the name of their cult ideology called Islam... hence the problem on both ends!

I think this is really the problem with the church today, it has become less organic, because people don't live in vicinity of it, and because people do not make it a priority to have time to learn in depth, or are indeed way to swamped with activities (but that is often a matter of priorities.)

The teacher's approach to such problems might start from three assumptions: (a) the teacher should be concerned with how science fits into the larger framework of life, and the student should raise questions about the meaning of what he studies and its relation to other fields; (b) controversial questions can be treated, not in a spirit of indoctrination, but with an emphasis on asking questions and helping students think through assumptions and implications; an effort should be made to present viewpoints other than one's own as fairly as possible, respecting the integrity of the student by avoiding undue imposition of the lecturer's beliefs; (c) presuppositions inevitably enter the classroom presentation of many subjects, so that a viewpoint frankly and explicitly recognized may be less dangerous than one which is hidden and assumed not to exist.

This makes sense to you, although it makes no sense at all to me (and I would predict it makes no sense to the other 5 billion of us non Muslims), I would have less problems if it were applied to all citizen of that country, both men and women, those in power and the working class, the rulers and the ruled, but that is not the case.

If the branches of the federal government are truly coequal, if the President and Congress are not subordinated to the Court by the Constitution (except insofar as the Court might declare them to be), then the theme of «judicial restraint» that runs wistfully through your symposium is less an appeal for the impossible than a misconstrual of the problem.

The inequality of laws concerning punishment of suspicion of adultery, the pervasiveness of polygamy, the fact that women were viewed as property, the lesser value ascribed to baby girls, and the suggestion that women are more easily deceived than men are all striking problems for modern readers... and as Christians we should not underestimate the impact they may have on unbelieving seekers.

The problem is that people who behave the way Christ did — taking care of the less fortunate, living their life as an example of God's love — do not, by definition, stand up and say «look at me, I'm a Christian — see how superior I am!»

From the article: He said: «The sin of lust isn't just a mistake, a mess - up or a problem... it is no less than an act of sin that is reprehensible to God and nothing short of honestly confessing and repenting of that sins is good enough for God.»

The field of imagination at any rate is broad, ranging from automatic, instinctual, or reflex actions (in which the problem of meaning is virtually, but not entirely, non-existent), to more or less habitual modes of response to «natural signs,» and rising ultimately to sophisticated conceptual activity and various poetic or secondary forms of meaning — making in cultural and social significations.19 In the higher reaches of semiotic activity an increase in imaginative freedom is accompanied by a greater risk of error.

But the history of our time is no less the stage upon which the drama of salvation is played out than was the history of the fifth century B.C. or the first century A.D. Accordingly, the Christian does not doubt that God is moving with power in the world today — the world of African nationalism, thermonuclear politics, metropolitan planning, and space exploration, The Christian's problem is rather to discover when, where, and how God is moving with such decisiveness as to create a crisis of decision for the church and to summon it and its resources into the struggle.

Perhaps the pope should have chosen a less «brusque» (his characterization of the emperor's statement) example from history, but his obvious point was to show that the problem he was addressing is not new.

The sin of lust isn't just a mistake, a mess - up or a problem... it is no less than an act of sin that is reprehensible to God and nothing short of honestly confessing and repenting of that sins is good enough for God.

Hasker's third proposition is that for the problem of divine non-intervention to be a real problem, «we must be able to identify specific kinds of cases in which God morally ought to intervene but does not» Many critics of (traditional) theism probably already have a more or less vague list of such cases, which might include genocidal events, such as the Nazi holocaust and the Rwandan massacre; wars; large - scale natural disasters; conditions of chronic poverty, in which millions of children die from starvation or are permanently stunted because of inadequate protein; the sexual molestation of children, which often leaves them psychologically scarred for the rest of their lives; death preceded by long, painful illnesses, such as cancer or AIDS, or by mind - destroying conditions, such as Alzheimer's disease; and the kinds of events described by Dostoyevski, such as the soldier using his pistol to get a mother's baby to giggle with delight and then blowing its brains out.

x) Orthodox (Advaita) Vedanta realizes that substantial pluralism is at best less true than substantial monism; but it fails, in my opinion, to see that the radical pluralism of actual entities and the radical monism of God or Nirvana (however one distinguishes these) are the two poles of the real problem, not the ordinary substantial pluralism of common sense, a compromise which bars the path to the highest ethical and spiritual insight.

The Christologies of the various forms of the kerygmata known to us from the New Testament and Christian history are not necessarily coherent with one another, still less necessarily consistent with the teaching of the historical Jesus, and historical research may well raise problems for a form of the kerygma, as, for example, research into the eschatology of Jesus raised problems for the older liberalism.

But the problems of discriminating between what is and is not Christian are less acute than the problem of the dessicated imagination, the problem of the abyss between the word of God and our imaginative appropriation of it.

I was not sure I would be wild about the crunchy top, so I did 30 covered / 10 uncovered, and that may have been part of the problem — less time for evaporation.

Well, i have read thru the comments on this a couple of times, and while i have made a few loaves, I seem to have the same problem each time — it's not as «tall» as yours, so I hope adding a bit less water and more yeast will help — also, i have regular yeast — a whole jar full — and added it to the flour before adding it to warm water — so I hope by adding warm water to not cold yeast will help.

If I'd had a grill grate with less space between the grates, then this may not have been as much of a problem.

But have leftover rice is less of a problem as it doesn't go off quite as quickly!

I'm not certain, but I think part of the problem is having a little too much oil (less is better in the measuring) and more honey than maple syrup.

Giroud misses more than he hits, Walcott has NEVER delivered his expected talent, Welbeck will NEVER be the striker to score 20 goals a season Coqellin will NOT go a whole season injury or suspension free, Sanchez and Ozil WILL have down period during the season, all teams have these problems to a greater or lesser degree but most of the top teams will address these problems and players either inprove or are sold and replaced with better or at least more consistant players, NOT Wenger he keeps doing the same thing over and over with the same players and he expects a different result but gets the same outvome time and time again, yet its ALWAYS someone else's fault be it the Ref or the linesman or the opposition or bad luck or whatever and whoever and its NEVER the fact that HE has done nothing to change the situation and LOOKS LIKELY to not change it next time arouNOT go a whole season injury or suspension free, Sanchez and Ozil WILL have down period during the season, all teams have these problems to a greater or lesser degree but most of the top teams will address these problems and players either inprove or are sold and replaced with better or at least more consistant players, NOT Wenger he keeps doing the same thing over and over with the same players and he expects a different result but gets the same outvome time and time again, yet its ALWAYS someone else's fault be it the Ref or the linesman or the opposition or bad luck or whatever and whoever and its NEVER the fact that HE has done nothing to change the situation and LOOKS LIKELY to not change it next time arouNOT Wenger he keeps doing the same thing over and over with the same players and he expects a different result but gets the same outvome time and time again, yet its ALWAYS someone else's fault be it the Ref or the linesman or the opposition or bad luck or whatever and whoever and its NEVER the fact that HE has done nothing to change the situation and LOOKS LIKELY to not change it next time arounot change it next time around.

Further, despite his injury problems in recent seasons which has seen him gradually feature in less and less games, Gareth Bale still has the faith of his coach and so the possible signing of Neymar isn't one that has been welcomed by Zidane.

The problems for Manchester United are that one, they don't really have any alternative, and two, Rooney's performance looked less like an early - season outlier, more like another episode of the same old schtick.

I don't have a problem with negativity from Falcon fans because 1) the team justifies it like no other, 2) if we required all fans to have rose colored glasses there would be no need for a «Falcoholic» discussion site, and 3) negative fans aren't less supportive of the team just because they're pessimistic.

I would say Weenger has had less luck with developing holding midfielders and GKs, if the def has a weak belly ahead of it and a poor GK behind then of course the def will have problems but the def was not always the issue.

I really hope Bellerin becomes more consistent with his quality.That's what will make him world class.He really needs to improve.His main problem is that he's not yet been able to create a balance between all of his abilities.Hopefully with more game time and less injuries this season he can play more maturely and improve his decision making.The talent given to him is so huge that he can be one of the very best RB in Europe if he wants to.He just needs to try as much as possible to maximise his potential by being patient and working hard.He can be so so good if he works hard.

Ozil does not contribute enough to deserve such a salary, and that creates problems within the team where players are making 3 - 5 times less than him, watching a guy play well 20 - 30 % of the time.

40m (kondogbia + sokratis) couldve given us a squad that was expected to win the title and enter the later stages of the champions League but arsene was too indecisive, subtitutions could've given us wins at leicester and city but arsene never subs on time, less than 24 hrs ago we got pummeled because he doesn't rotate, I think it isn't too hard to c where the problem is.....

I'm also a big fan of Dzeko, the only problem is, Man City have got them on such high wages, that they won't be happy with anything less as it may seem like a backwards step in their careers to them.

Yes, problem is though, even if he is a million times better than Giroud he is still less prolific — bit of an evidential hurdle to overcome wouldn't you say?

If Mr wenger built a team who never lost it tells me he can build a team remember a team consists of 11 different characters with different back grounds beliefs and aspirations and problems with another 11 to back them up I remember years ago the press used to talk about arsenal and not having English players on the field never the less I know off our own fatalities as such we were somehow always coming up little short by injuries to such Edwardo vanpercie and even gas diaby ramsy rosiscky carzola and many more and others that did nt seem to gel well I am not blind and I know we are not doing well but to suggest that Mr wenger docent have a clue is totally preposterous and disrespectful

It's less of a problem this season because we aren't going to win the title anyways, but it's also something we have to strengthen before we can really contend?

With Santi Cazorla having had to have surgery to fix his ankle problem and being set for about three months out, the most obvious replacement for the German is not available and the manager's recent experiments of using Aaron Ramsey in the number 10 role have been somewhat less than encouraging.