Sentences with phrase «n't believe in something»
If you don't believe in something then find your own proof and leave others alone.
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/
It cracks me up when people say that God has not spoken to them and you can't believe in something that can not be defined.
OK since I don't believe in something, I can't talk about it and if I did that would make me a hypocrite?
They don't believe in something, so they can't stand the thought of someone who DOES believe being happy or content.
The problem with most people is, they can't believe in something they can't see.
Larry - «They don't believe in something, so they can't stand the thought of someone who DOES believe being happy or content.»
Nye isn't saying don't believe in God, he is saying don't believe in something that is counter to scientific FACT.
They just suddenly decide they don't believe in something anymore and walk away from it, and it never affects them negatively.
But I do know this, half measures availed us nothing, and if I don't believe in something, I'm afraid I'll believe in anything.
Well, that just proved that there IS a way that someone can't believe in something.
There is no way someone can't believe in something.
I have been reading through these comments and am absolutely stunned by the level of hatred and intolerance displayed by some people who, supposedly, just don't believe in something.
Just because someone doesn't believe in something doesn't mean they believe it doesn't exist.
What is the point of a bumper sticker proclaiming that you don't believe in something?
I just find it ammusing that they spend so much time trying to justify why they don't believe in something.
I don't believe in something my brain tells me is impossible so I get to burn in hell.
The faith it takes to not believe in something beyond a earthly existence is the greatest faith of all.
Not believing in something does not equal hate, just as believing in something does not make it real.
Why not believe in something?
It is quite obvious that not believing in something there is no evidence for takes zero faith.
How exactly is it fair or just to punish a person for not believing in something they have never heard of?
Very well said, just because we believe or not believe in something does not make it true or untrue.
It actually doesn't take faith to not believe in something for which there is no evidence.
I was taught to always seek the truth, therefore I can not believe in something like a god.
It would be nice if it turned out that it was another God who actually believed in the concept behind the Golden Rule and judged everyone based on performance rather than whether or not they believed in something he refused to prove.
Not to mention this «all loving» and «all just» god willing to torture you for all of eternity just for the crime of not believing in something for which there is no evidence.
Why I do not believe in something without any actual reason to believe in that something.
Please explain how not believing in something supernatural can lead to atrocities.
A reasonable person would say «I don't want anyone telling me why I do or do not believe in something, so I will not tell anyone else why they do or do not believe in something.»
There are not six types of not believing in something.
My one question is... since when do you have to score well on a test to be able to believe or not believe in something?
unknown11 I know this is very hard for you to grasp but not believing in something is not the same as believing in something else.
You need not believe in something you know to be true and real.
I also can not believe in something which doesn't even have a coherent, non self - contradictory definition in the first place.
If you haven't believed in something so much that you are willing to die for it then you just don't understand.
How can you not believe in something when you acknowledge that it is by saying it's not.
Well, I'm not quite sure about the motivation regarding the «holiday» billboards but upon reflecting I find it very difficult in not believing in something greater than myself no matter what you may call it.
How can so much commentary be generated from not believing in something?
Atheist sure do invest a lot of emotion, time, and energy into not believing in something.
If you can not believe in something produced by reconstruction, you may have nothing left to believe in.
Funny, I don't recall the 1st Church of Atheism making a TV pitch to somebody's demented old grandma to send in her life savings in return for NOT believing in something.
How can you not believe in something like that?
It's more than just not believing in something, it's a constant reminder that no matter what you do that is good in this world, you are considered, by the majority, a piece of trash if you don't believe in white apples.
He concludes his critical investigation in The Historical Jesus: The Life of a Mediterranean Jewish Peasant with the astonishing sentence «If you can not believe in something produced by reconstruction, you may have nothing left to believe in...» [5] Yet no critical reconstruction of any kind can achieve a representation of the original reality of Jesus» career beyond the realm of probability.
I made no such claim that because one does not believe in something it proves that thing exists.
Apparently you don't understand that there is a difference between believing in something for which there is no proof and not believing in something for which there is no proof.
We only need to be able to not believe in something, as all others do.
A wise person will not believe in something without proof.
I believe you should review your statements about willful ignorance, a person whom can not believe in something greater than themselves is ignorant.
Me as an Atheist would not say people can not believe in something, the problem is our arguments are driven by many things including civil liberties, existence, evolution, education, war, child abuse and so forth.