Sentences with phrase «n't build our attacks»

He knows he wouldn't last long in a team that can not build the attack from the back, can not possess the ball too long, has kick - rush style and always make long kicks from the goal instead of playing the opponent's attackers with passing game, like Arsenal.

Not exact matches

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.

The successful challenger could build a coalition around a platform consisting of what used to be Trump themes — «they are laughing at us,» «we don't win anymore,» «we are weak and indecisive,» «they attack us with impunity» — but this time claiming that it is Trump himself who has made that problem worse.

And if you back up information but store the duplicated materials onsite or in an adjacent building, as some downtown Manhattan businesses did before the terrorist attacks of September 2001, you won't be any better off in a disaster that affects an entire region.

Granted this strategy was profitable in his situation, it's just not the way SEOs should attack link building.

«If you don't attack a big market, it's highly unlikely you're ever going to build a big company.»

When someone calls that Imam one of the most evil people on the planet, when someone says he wants to build his center to train terrorists, when someone calls for amending the constitution to exclude Islam, when someone says our founding fathers wanted this to be a Christian nation and that they didn't want Muslims included, when Muslims are afraid to go out because they will be attacked, when Christian pastors are preaching against Muslims (as opposed to the belief in Islam), THAT is hatred.

Although I hope not your position, the dialogue you use is similar to the one found in counter-culture argumentation, to develop and build anti-Christian positions and attacks against fundamental belief and faith central to real Christian teachings.

«Terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest buildings, but they can not touch the foundation of America,» he said.

It is essential that teachers who take seriously their obligations in character building should be protected from attack from those who can not distinguish between democracy and subversion.

Therefore, a head - long attack on our anthropocentric tendencies may not be the appropriate way to begin building a theology that would promote an environmentally sensitive outlook.

This guy is such a loser.You don't attack people or the church buildings.

Many who did not go this far stressed the need of human effort to build the kingdom, with a strong emphasis on the need to attack and eliminate the social evils of war, injustice, and oppression.

Since it is not being built on «ground zero», you have no basis for attack other than some silly «sentimentality» that does not allow anyone to experience American freedoms and rights within a ridiculously large radius around «ground zero».

Not only had they set up their cameras BEFORE the attacks, but they WERE DANCING on the roof of their van as the buildings were hit.

You can't seem to argue against solid concepts, so you build a caricature that you can attack.

Honestly, if this mosque is actually built, I would not be surprised if was attacked by a domestic terrorist.

Leading Boston clergy who attacked the gradual encroachment of the British on New England rights also attacked what they felt were the destructive tendencies of the Great Awakening not only in Jonathan Edwards but especially in his less sophisticated and less intelligent cohorts.26 Puritanism was built upon the centrality of the doctrine of conversion, and in New England it was held that only truly converted people could be accepted into full church membership.

All this stress building up has been giving you panic attacks and the seratonin isn't making it any better.

You can have all the talent in the attacking positions, and make no progress if your defence can't contribute to your build up... City had this same attacking talent last season and they had to build a whole new defence for the forwards to realise their potential.

Unlike Barcelona, we don't have a Messi, Iniesta, Xavi or even Busquet to play «tiki taka», build on fast attacks from the midfield to penetrate the opponents defense and produce a magical moment week in week.

The home side will be built to counter attack according to Sam Allardyce, in hope of picking holes in our defence, and we will have to be wary of their in - form striker Jermaine Defoe, although he does not have a great record against us.

Did not cover himself in glory during the build - up to Villa's goal, but — that aside — played pretty well, both in defence and attack.

OG's main strength is not goals, but build up and setting up our team attacks.

You do have a point and I can not honestly disagree with that but with figure like Cech I would like to think that we'd have more confidence going forward and pinning back teams, watch Sczezny, he almost deliberately invites attacks to show off his reflexes, Ospina came in and cut that crap especially by constantly organizing his defense but physically not built up enough for a world class goalkeeper, we lost three points to Swansea for that reason [Befitimbi Gomis» goal - line technology goal?]

i do nt think that aw wl pay that huge amt for mbappe eventhoug he build for the future He can invest that amt to bring to qualified player an attacking and CB I think all is tactical movement to cover his real target and it wl suprise all of us There few signing caming in the next few days and at the same time he wl sort out players demed surplus for us.

if i am correct @ SD... your analysis shows you see the forest for the trees, most comments just give their opinion like they are playing Championship manager - as JT said coquelin has helped slightly fix the problem of the overexposure of our defence to counter attacks and the full backs don't both bomb forward as much, the reason monreal starts ahead of Gibbs - walcott always looks lost and confused now when he makes appearances, and never wants to create or get too involved in build up play just wants to run into the middle and get on the end of balls.

He does so much work with the build up to the attack that other strikers simply can't.

What I'm saying, again not arguing with you, is that so much of our attack is built from deep and starts with our CM.

yeah I am not sure why Wenger changed his tactics over the years from fast attacking, counter attack football to slow build up play.

Arsenal should use them again or use similar hardworking players, because Arsenal can not let Chelsea build their attack from the back.

Chelsea play a large chunk of their football on the counter-attack, taking advantage of the pace in their attacking line and wings to hurt teams, but our play is not so direct, as we prefer to build up slowly and with Ozil in our side, there is less room to play in the way the champions do.

Are some of you on here missing a few brain cells as fans There is nothing Arsenal or Wenger can do with the Sanchez situation He wants to leave and has been offered 400k a week in wages who in their right mind is going to turn that down as a player As for blaming wenger who has been our most successful manager helped us build a stadium gave us 20 years of cl football and some of the best teams the ol has seen Including the invincible and you all have the Gaul to trash the man as if he has done nothing for the club I suggest you should look at the plastic fans in the Arsenal blogs that have created a toxic atmosphere at the club They attack their own players in a daily basis why would any top player come to s club where the manager the owners and players are shamelessly attached constantly Yet Wenger wins trophies regularly even them that is derided Look at Spurs Liverpool they win fuk all every year yet their fans back then Look at yourselves and all the negativity that you have created striking the club before you blame Wenger for everything I have been a season ticket holder since the 70s and never have I seen our fanbase been so full of entitled morons who have stopped backing the club and constantly deride the club snd attack it We have the worst fanbase in football you have made this great club a lagging stock in world football All you now us fans constantly moaning If you don't like Arsenal fc then buy out kronke and run the club or fuk off and support someone else You won't be missed Coyg

Arsenal can not let Manchester City build their attack from the back and it could only be achieved by constantly pressurizing their defense.

Arsenal at present can field different styles of attack, Mandzukic is another Giroud and right now that would not be a bad thing, because our attack is built around a giroud, welbeck offers pace but has not master how to run behind defenders yet and finishing, Sanogo basically the same, but even poorer finishing ability, a Mandzukic would be more clinical than both.

The media are having fun saying this should be our year, they're building us up so they can attack us if we don't win the title.

That Howe, whose success last season was built around possession and an attacking approach, is constructing a team to counter-attack, on the not reasonable assumption that better opposition will mean his own players see less of the ball.

What a joke.If Wenger had built a defence like he has in midfield and in attack the title would be ours.I couldn't believe when the fans started to sing There's only one Arsene Wenger.What a joke.Get this man out of this club.Wenger out out out

But an article informed that he is not too good with the ball, which means Arsenal would not be able to build the attack from the back with him.

With attacking options we have now we don't need that side of his game so much... Need to boost defensive side of midfield and have creative players who can build for the real goal scorers and Ramsey is crap at both those...

NOW all that said is he better the 80 % of the players in England YES but so I would never say he a crap or is just rubbish just not the player Arsenal need to move forward to build a title wining team with Rosicky, Ozil, Cazorla, Ramsey and even Podolski that can al play in that attacking mid role he.

i would not mind one or two more additions, Sissoko would have to be my number one selection, he would actually compliment Sanchez in attack with his box to box ability and endless energy reserve, another player i would grab up quickly if is cost was actually 2 million would be Edgar Mendez a winger who i think could be transformed into a dangerous striker, he has pace to burn and has the built of a striker, wenger i think would be the right man to get the best from him.

Yes, we nees some speed in the team after Theo's injury but what's the purpose of buying attacking players when there isn't a sure defensive unit to make the attacking prowess of the team solid????? Its like constructing a building without proper foundation.

Instead of fixating on replacing Giroud to get maybe 4 - 6 extra goals a season (and contrary to accepted popular belief there are very few if any supporters who would be upset if an upgrade came in) why can't we a bit more imaginative about this; conceding 10 less goals could have won us the title just as easily, further refining our balance between defence and attack, building on the cohesion and fledgling confidence we have built - up may, just may, bring bigger benefits than ripping the spine of the team out and starting again.

The tactics were right as we did not become reckless at any stage so kept a valuable and confidence building clean sheet while still having more than enough attacking threat top win the game comfortably.

We need goals everywhere in the side Giroud is the platform to build off the wall pass the man who occupies the centre half's, the attacking mids are there to join in with him and we need our left and right forwards to arch there runs from out to in for Ozil to slide balls in for them after Giroud holding it up or Ramsey to slide the passes or arrive late himself we need to share the goals round the side more instead of this nonsense of let's find a 30 goal prem scorer which no team has either lol Giroud is contributing well for us of course he misses chances what striker doesn't.

They couldn't efficiently protect the defence and build the attack on a consistent basis.

yeah but i also have to say that he does nt sparkle either: / he did score some goals but whenever i see him in the game i cant really say that he is the one i want to have permanently on the right because he slows the attacks down very often and often passes turn on the wing and passes back, right now he is only better than the ox because he scored 3 goals more i think maybe a bit more, but neither of them do enough, ramsey on the other side when he started on the wing at the start of the season did a lot of things for the build - up i prefer ramsey to campbell... well of course an in form walcott of the season 12/13 would be the dream because in that season he was in my opinion equal if not better than sanchez of the season 14/15 but thats a dream xD

If Arsenal can not dictate the tempo and build the attack from the back, they will not be able to compete with stronger teams in Premier League.

I think it would also offer more freedom to our attack to be the attack, knowing they can pass the ball back safely to AMN or Wilshere who will not then just pass it back to CB, it could be that platform to build attacks on, pressing high and trusting in AMN pace.