@ Joe My apologies to you that you felt the need to use curse words to defend your belief in Evolution and I am surprised that the CNN «moderators» didn't catch that word.
Again the boy didn't catch his words, not fully.
Just be careful here because while spell - check will catch misspelled words it won't catch words that are spelled correct, but are the incorrect word in regard to meaning.
You pick up the ideas in the room even if you don't catch every word.
Most of the time, it won't catch your words, and even if it does, will fail to understand what you want.
Spell - check will
not catch a word usage mistake like that.
These online tools do
not catch every word, nor every mistake.
Not exact matches
Vaping is addictive... or
not... depending on who's doing it: «Among youth» (that's anybody who would never be
caught dead using the
word «youth»), «there is substantial evidence that e-cigarette use increases the risk of transitioning to smoking conventional cigarettes.»
Even though Spellchecker is a valuable tool, it does
not always
catch nuances between homophones (
words that sound alike, but are spelled differently and have two different meanings).
Here are
words I hope to never
catch myself saying again: «
Not to be negative but» or «I can't» or «I need.»
Don't waste 200
words explaining how to
catch a bus.
And this point dovetails with the other point as far as since we don't pretend to know the precise timing of when bubbles kind of unwind or when the busts will finally reach a bottom, the idea is that we can actually be in the right quartile of activity, in other
words I never try to
catch the very top of a bubble, I don't try to ride things to the very end, and similarly I don't mind
catching falling knifes.
Just don't let me
catch you including
words like Tyra Banks or death in your title — unless it really makes sense to do so.
In other
words, don't get
caught in the trap that ETFs are cheaper, more tax - efficient, and so on — the facts are that there is little difference between ETFs that track broad - based indexes and index mutual funds (in terms of cost and tax efficiency).
We should
not be surprised that the
words catch his attention.
The worst position would be a Christian that does
not know if the Bible is the
Word of God or a godless one that is sweaten bullets because something about that Bible keeps
catching the eye like the fruit that Eve saw.
Of course, you notably
worded it as «won't let us
catch them», when what is really meant by calling the terrorists cowards is how they hide amongst civilians, perform heinous acts of terrorism against civilians and then run off and hide in tunnels, houses, caves, etc, forever afraid to show their faces.
Don't mean to be provocative but I am
catching a degree of pacifism in your
words and tone.
The Bible says the same kinds of things about people who don't worship the one true god... it even tells you you to kill people who try to convert you... the difference is that we have grown as a society and we no longer murder people for what they believe... islam hasn't
caught up with the rest of us... it's a problem and threat to the civilized
word.
I also use the «f -
word» quite liberally, but I wouldn't be
caught dead in a Budweiser t - shirt.
Actually, Wolfe says NASA did have a philosopher — Wernher von Braun, whose
word didn't
catch on, he speculates, because he was a German with a Nazi background.
In other
words, it is wise for Christians to pray for people who are
caught in sin and help rescue them from these sins so that they don't die.
«We who are left alive until the Lord comes shall
not forestall those who have died; because at the
word of command, at the sound of the archangel's voice and God's trumpet - call, the Lord himself will descend from heaven; first the Christian dead will rise, then we who are left alive shall join them,
caught up in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air.»
If people are
caught in religion (man's striving to reach God on their own, apart from the work of Jesus) they may
not be encountered by the living
Word, which is Jesus Himself.
Or we hear of St. Paul «
caught up to Paradise» where he heard «things that can
not be expressed in
words, things that no human being has a right even to mention» (2Cor 12:4).
The hearers may detect the inner contradiction and neatly label the problem: the minister does
not have conviction and enthusiasm; his whole life is
not caught up in his
words; David is trying to fight in Saul's armor.
Jeremy have been asking the holy spirit for his help with this and in regards to the lame man that Jesus healed I do
nt believe that sin was the issue for him just like the blind man was it his parents or did he sin the answer was neither but so that God would be glorified.What was the sin that may have been worse for him.The two situations are related of the woman
caught in adultery the key
words being go and sin no more only two references in the bible and will explain later the lame man we see at first his dependency on everyone else for his needs he cant do it he is in the best position to receive Gods grace but what does he do with it.Does he follow Jesus no we are told he goes to the temple and Jesus finds him now that he has his strength to do things on his own what his response to follow the way of the pharisees that is what is worse than his condition before so he is warned by go and sin no more.We get confused because we see the
word sin but the giver of is speaking to him to go another way means death.Getting back to the two situations of the woman
caught in adultery and the lame man here we see a picture of our hearts on the one our love for sin and on the other the desire to work out our salvation on our terms they are the two areas we have to submit to God.My experience was the self righteousness was the harder to deal with because it is linked in to our feelings of self worth and self confidence so we have to be broken so we are humble enough to realise that without God we can do nothing our flesh hates that so it is a struggle at first to change our way of thinking.brentnz
, a question deriving
not so much from the Catholic tradition as from the dilemma of cradle Catholics
caught up in the maelstrom of collapsing social norms and carnal yearnings unleashed by the sexual revolution of the «sixties, of which we can say, in Lady Bracknell's
words»... I presume you know what that unfortunate movement led to?»
In other
words, in the cross and resurrection story, the bond between the meaning of the story and what Jesus did is very tight, whereas in the story of the woman
caught in adultery (John 8: 1 - 11), the story is true whether or
not it actually occurred, because it shows us the kind of person that Jesus was.
That is to say, other than the
catch phrase «God's
Word» I'm
not sure what the Bible is to many who claim it as the sacred text that guides their life.
This is why I don't get too
caught up in all the debates surrounding the Greek
word for «head,» though they are interesting and may prove helpful to some.
For the past seven years, the popular press has from time to time published eye -
catching progress reports on the work of the Jesus seminar under headlines such as «Most of Jesus»
words ghostwritten,» «Jesus probably didn't recite Lord's Prayer, scholars say,» «Is the Bible the gospel truth?»
The preacher said a few
words that she couldn't quite
catch, and then she got a signal that it was all in earnest.
Not in an incense cloud,
Not in
words long and loud, No gold or silver by Shining to
catch thine eye, Rises my prayer.
Also, I think there's a few
words missing from the first step in your instructions («Place the sheet [in the freezer]...») Lord knows I make typos all the time but I love it when people help me
catch them so I hope you don't find this obnoxious!
Here is my tutorial on how to render beef tallow, and don't forget to
catch the parting
words from Julia Child about what she thought of the shift to vegetable oils for frying!
This is simple a very intelligent child can solve this problem.Firstly today our keeper was very poor however i know he will come good.By the way why is Paulista no getting his chance.What i have observed about arsenal since we signed Mertesacker from day one and since he started playing is that Mertesacker hardly gets involved you will usually see him a few times because he does
not want to get
caught out.e has always been a weak link in the defence even in his greatest performances here.When i see us playing with a high line and he is there i always laugh.It is just a mistake waiting to happen and i can tell u that it will happen again this season.Secondly why is Ramsey Cazorla and Ozil playing in the same line - up in a 4 -5-1 formation.That is just
not right though it will win you some matches due to individual brilliance.It wont work at all.Lastly the least i say about Giroud the better i am
not judging him on one game.One would imagine if he was
not french and like chinese will he be getting these chances under Wenger.To me he will always be an average player and i will stand by my
word even if he has good games.
Few
words like «left», «right», «offside and warning the lad in case of being
caught, in any language is
not hard to learn.
I
catch a few rumors and talks now, nothing major, obviously, but even I'm getting
word the NFC East squads aren't interested.
there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or
not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their
word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's
not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually
catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark
And although he did
not say it in so many
words, the comments in a Sky Sports report from the Spurs and France number one Hugo Lloris tell me that the Tottenham players are worried about the Gunners
catching them.
They
catch this disease from a manager who does no defensive coaching whatever but just hopes for the best - in other
words, a fraud,
not earning the money he is paid.
Just to mention we have
not heard a single
word from IVAN since he made those revelation a while back and i am now totally convinced it was done to sell tickets BUT guess what???? we got
caught, again!!
No
word if it was anything serious, but on an alley - oop dunk, Donovan Mitchell
caught and grazed the rim gently on the dunk,
not his normal intensity.
Not the most clever sense of occasion and
words from the injury prone number 14 as once more Arsenal find themselves playing
catch up this season.
«As I get
caught up in the opinions and harsh
words being thrown around Facebook and other social media outlets, I can't help but think about the message we are trying to make a reality in our home.
I am a proponent of «Gentle Birth» philosophy and will support your baby being born in water and «received» (I do
not use the
words «deliver» or «
catch») with assistance from you, your partner or friend / family member.
In other
words, they won't necessarily make it a priority to
catch your child up on his studies when he gets back.
Even if baby doesn't understand the
words, she'll
catch your meaning from your tone.
If you can't tell, these comments frustrate me because other people, specifically non-loss parents, are so afraid of
catching the «child loss disease» that apparently I now carry, that they can't offer out
words of compassion and comfort.