Sentences with phrase «n't conjecture»

«What isn't conjecture is that the strong warming trends in the Arctic will affect the circulation at least within and near the Arctic,» Vavrus told BuzzFeed news.

I can't conjecture where you got the figure of 1.5 for March 2010.

«I can't conjecture about the individual motivations of one candidate or another,» de Blasio said.

«I don't conjecture.

sam stone It is not conjecture it is simply taken direct from the Bible.

Not conjecture, not your spiritual connection or feeling, just a shred of evidence...

Those are actually facts, not conjecture.

try science not conjecture and vain hopes

Verification, not conjecture, is what I would urge.»

Knowing the DfE's internal processes are not always tip - top (that's not conjecture, by the way, that's based on independent audits and a plethora of performance statistics), I presume the influx of applicants was tough to deal with.

If so, hard science, not conjecture or theory or theology tells us, to look one way or the other.

Let facts, not conjecture, emotion or misinformation, inform this important debate.

Minister Oliver has called for pipeline decisions to be «based on science and facts, not conjecture, hyperbole or ideology.»

Actually that's not conjecture, given Sen. Pat Roberts (R - KS) told Vox's Jeff Stein as much, before dissolving into a bizarre «Thelma & Louise» metaphor that proves literally everyone else's point much better than his own.

Not exact matches

This is important if you're seeking funding; the investor will want to know just how dependable your information is, and won't risk money on assumptions or conjecture.

We didn't venture in conjecture.

Under court rulings, this transformation is supposed to be «reasonably probable» to occur in the «reasonably near future,» and not rely on «mere speculation and conjecture.»

Though it is way too soon for this brand of conjecture regarding AAPL's performance, some may find it meaningful that after hitting an all - time high of $ 133.60 in late February (not reflected on the most recent report), the stock has flagged a bit since the Dow announcement.

I actually feel guilty swearing in here, even though it's just conjecture and not aimed at anything in a negative manner.

Valueless, if not hurtful, conjecture.

The more people see this nonsense debunked the sooner we can rely on reason, not tradition and conjecture.

You can not declare him anything and decide it was is more appropriate; because you are basing your ideas on conjecture and not solid facts.

As to whether the devil is straight: Conjectures based on the textual evidence are admittedly just that — conjectures — but that should not stop us from retrojecting our notions of gendeConjectures based on the textual evidence are admittedly just that — conjectures — but that should not stop us from retrojecting our notions of gendeconjectures — but that should not stop us from retrojecting our notions of gender identity.

I am not writing any of this to argue with anyone about philosophy, Scripture or anything else, nor will I conjecture as to why this topic agitates you so much.

Especially since they most likely have not heard from God and are just conjecturing, usually without much sensitivity.

You don't have to conjecture about which church God and His son would go to....

If you don't then kindly refrain from conjecture.

First, creationism is * not * a scientific hypothesis or conjecture, It is not falsifiable or testable via observation, experiment or predictive ability.

It may be conjecture or simply wishful thinking, but it is not a theory for the simple reason that it can not be tested.

Theology is not a dry exercise in conjecture — the answers really do matter.

I may be wrong, but it is my conjecture that God is using your life experiences and knowledge to help us all understand the evidence, not excluding you.

What can not be measured is mere conjecture; there's no need to «exclude» those possibilities, but there's no reason to call them anything other than «conjecture,» either.

Your over simplified view that all is conjecture may help you sustain your belief, but don't fool yourself into thinking it is some truth.

All you have is conjecture, which don't mean a thing...

Allah the Almighty says in Quran» That they said (in boast), «We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of God»; - but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not: - Nay, God raised him up unto Himself; and God is Exalted in Power, Wise; - ``

Descartes conjectures: «But maybe also I am something more than I would imagine; maybe all the perfections that I attribute to the nature of a God are in some way in my power, albeit that they are not are not yet evident and are not made manifest by their actions» -LCB- Meditations, 37).

I'm amused at how much faith people put in theoretical science, that can't prove anything except by falsifying facts with conjecture.

The circumstances conducing to the enunciation of the doctrine at this time can be conjectured, if not certainly identified.

I can not offer any proof to the contrary and i do not wish to enter into conjecture.

Whitehead conjectures that this entirely living nexus is not a society for two reasons.

As Christopher Norris has beautifully documented, the positivist fairy - tale of open - minded scientists accumulating measurable evidence, making conjectures based on that evidence, and then seeking to refute those conjectures does not well describe the actual way that scientists operate.

The only thing quoted is «any such artifact to their door,» the rest of the statement is conjecture and doesn't make reference to the sign I mentioned.

Rationalism and scientism (belief in the epistemological supremacy of reason and especially of scientific method) produced the conjecture, in some quarters at least, that the symbolic / mythic / poetic / narrative modes of expression employed by all the religions are perhaps nothing more than our own subjective projections or constructs, and not representations of an independent sacral reality.

It's not up for discussion or conjecture.

We simply do not know enough to assign any attributes for the state of anything outside of THIS universe prior to big bang and call that conjecture fact.

A critic could conjecture that reality's structure and concreteness arose in some primordial instance of creation, though not from the purely indeterminate, which is Neville's dubious thesis, but from absolutely nothing.

(Fortunately we possess this source and therefore are not reduced to pure conjecture.)

Can't really pretend otherwise, pure conjecture.

She has, so far, not the least glimmer of a conjecture or suggestion, — not even a bad verbal metaphor or pun to offer.

These difficulties have led to a variety of positions about induction within the formalist tradition which range from the view that theory formation is not in its essence inference from particular to general (Goodman 1955, p. 68), to the view that there is no inference involved in theory formation, only conjecture (Popper 1963, p. 192; Hempel 1966, p. 15).