The chairman of Penguin / Random House doesn't copyedit every book, nor does he try to design his own covers.
For example, you want storyline, narrative arc, and character development critiques,
not copyediting, spelling, and punctuation.
Not exact matches
For a 758 - page book I coedited in the mid-90s, I didn't just do my own
copyediting; I laid the whole book out in LaTeX.)
It is
not necessary for the referee to identify misspellings, typographical errors or grammatical misconstructions, unless these are technical in nature and might
not be picked up during the
copyediting process.
**** The article publishing charge (APC) will
not be refunded after the accepted article is
copyedited, or proofread, or published (in print or online, including online published ahead of print), or retracted after publishing
A copyeditor (grammar, spelling, etc.) doesn't need to know or understand your genre to
copyedit.
Personally, my books don't go through the
copyedit stage before I submit it to beta readers, but I do my absolute best to to make it the best it can be before I run it past other sets of eyes.
The big difference with indie publishing is that you are in control of the
copyedit and with traditional publishing you are
not.
Although some
copyediting typically takes place during a developmental edit, that is
not the focus of this type of edit.
Just finished going over the
copyedits on my 4th novel coming out in September, and I was dumbfounded at the things I typed that I hadn't caught, and that my other editor didn't catch, or my critique group didn't catch.
And I do content editing,
copyediting, and proofreading, so you're
not working with different people on various aspects of the process.
But on the traditional side,
not counting the submission time and energy, you have to go over the novel in the
copyedit stage and in the page proof stage, and over the years I've had books where I spent full days on just fixing bad
copyedits.
So, they do
not provide any editing,
copyediting, or proofreading.
I keep my focus on delivering a great story (which means developmental editing, paid or unpaid) that's clean enough
not to distract readers (which sometimes means
copyediting and sometimes
not).
For my novellas, I have
not used a copyeditor, mostly because of the economics, but also because I tend to write clean — I know that the finished product will still be relatively typo - free even without
copyediting.
There aren't the «rules» for «good» or «bad» advice the way there is with
copyediting standards or grammar rules.
My deadlines require me to turn in my manuscripts a full year before publication, so Things You Won't Say was already in the
copyediting stage when Michael Brown was shot to death by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri.
Authors don't always understand that self - publishing means that YOU, the author, are the publisher, and need to do everything for your book that a «real» publisher would do, like editing,
copyediting, design, production, marketing, distribution, etc..»
Dev editing is
not the same as
copyediting and is
not a substitute for that next valuable step.
It might
not be the first place you go for a highly skilled developmental editor, but your
copyediting and proofreading needs can easily be met through sites like these.
Copyediting is
not feedbacking / revision, which was completed previously.
I won't go into the fact that the plot line, the dialogue and the characters all needed a lot of work, probably more than a basic
copyedit could fix.
It's also in their interest to have a professional editorial analysis done before
copyediting to see if there are serious problems that a
copyedit won't fix.
Authors shouldn't publish without
copyediting.
Let's face it: until you're cranking out bestsellers or unless you're supporting your writing with another career, you're probably
not going to be able to swing a developmental edit plus a line edit plus a
copyedit plus proofreading (as well as cover design, interior design, and marketing support).
We already offer ghostwriting,
copyediting, and other a la carte services for authors who may
not even know how they're going to publish their book.
We offer all and any of the elements that constitute a full editorial process, including but
not limited to: line editing,
copyediting, cover design, illustration, trans...
That would be a final cleanup — but if your manuscript hasn't already had a line edit or
copyedit, your editor will by definition have to work at a deeper level.
You could get a line edit (tuning and polishing) on top of a
copyedit (mechanics and style), but you can't get a final review at the same time as an actual round of editing.
That said,
not all manuscripts will arrive at the first stage of production services — that is, the
copyediting phase — at the exact same level of tidiness.
Can readers tell when writing hasn't been
copyedited?
But a developmental editor would stop short of
copyediting or proofreading in most cases — or risk
not getting paid for what amounts to a separate task!
I can't begin to tell you how many days and weeks I wasted fighting a bad
copyedit.
The difference is that I control who I hire to
copyedit my books and in traditional publishing I don't.
When
copyediting, I do
not examine and make substantive suggestions for strengthening characters, plot, structure, argument, and theme.
When you do, please share with me your plans for the manuscript (indie publishing, traditional publishing, etc.) because, in my experience,
copyediting is
not something everyone needs.
We offer all and any of the elements that constitute a full editorial process, including but
not limited to: line editing,
copyediting, cover design, illustration, translation, digital formatting, digital publication, and print services.
They have their hearts set on seeing that book in print or on the Amazon shelf, but don't take the time to get
copyediting or proofreading.
There will always be exceptions, but most first drafts are
not ready for developmental editing, let alone
copyediting.
It can help you avoid embarrassing mistakes that will haunt you to the end of your writing days, because once you've distributed your book, it will appear on Amazon for resale as new or used by various third - party resellers with that horrible self - created cover and all those
copyediting errors in your manuscript,
not to mention that character you later wrote out because she was portrayed a bit too much like your litigious ex-best friend.
I don't like to spend time on
copyediting or proofreading until I've competed a big - picture edit.
Copyediting fees range from about $ 1500 and $ 7000 depending on the length of your book and quality of writing,
not to mention the skill of the editor you've hired.
Authors should give themselves at least a week, if
not two, to review and make changes after the
copyedit is returned.
Send your ARC to reviewers (note: do this AFTER the copyeditor — while ARC technically means BEFORE
copyediting, you don't need to give reviewers any more reason to complain about low quality indie books by handing them a product that's
not finished)
The data above (and also personal anecdotes in the comments of everybody's high - rolling author friends) is telling you repeatedly that $ 100k authors for the most part are
not spending that much on
copyediting.
And it doean't matter whose fault it is — the publisher is invisible to the reader (as many a trad pub author who's gotten complaints about covers or
copyediting can attest.)
Developmental editing does
not include correcting spelling and grammar; that is included in my proofreading and
copyediting services.
Not all manuscripts will need a
copyedit.
I use (lots of) critic partners for the developmental editing (we do in - kind swaps, so I'm
not paying for that, but it's incredibly valuable) then I pay a professional editor to
copyedit at the end.
For many, the problem is that they do
not have sufficient skills in all the tasks that must be carried out in addition to writing —
copyediting, design, layout, illustration, indexing, etc..