Sentences with phrase «n't corporate profits»

Schools are «the centers of our communities, not corporate profit centers.»

Developed countries must raise and meet their public financial commitments to developing countries without relying on the private sector — climate finance must serve the public interest, not corporate profits.

Not exact matches

The jobs you create are local, the taxes you pay benefit your local community, and the profits you earn go back into the local community — not lining the pockets of corporate CEOs.

Michael McNulty is linked to 4 organisations which are included in 9 lists - Accountants, Consulting Firms, Corporate Finance, Information & Communications Technology, Insolvency Practitioners, Tax Specialists, Law Firms and Patent Attorneys, Not For Profit Businesses and Charitable Organisations.

About 100 Boardlist candidates (some of whom already sit on not - for - profit, for - profit, or advisory boards, and the vast majority of whom live in the U.S.) were asked a number of questions about their experiences in business, and also about the fact that so few women serve on corporate boards.

If my word isn't good enough for you, maybe you should point the Doomers to this highly recommended Daily Kos diary by Ministry of Truth from three weeks ago, the title of which is Corporate profits just hit an all time high BECAUSE wages just hit an all time low.

If we think of the corporation (for - profit or otherwise) as an instrument or technology by means of which people seek to achieve their goals, then it becomes clear that the rights (or «rights») of different kinds of corporate persons depend not on what kind of entity they are, but on the the demonstrable goals of the human beings involved.

Slow growth, then, isn't always bad news for corporate profits or investors.

These types of companies do not pay federal taxes at the corporate tax rate, but rather pass along profits and losses to their shareholders — in many cases, the business owners themselves — who are then taxed at the individual rate.

In an article that discusses recent trends in corporate sponsorship entitled «Why Sponsors Sponsor,» author Jim Karrh lists the four criteria that not - for - profit fundraisers expect to be used by most companies in assessing the request to become involved as a sponsor.

This year's awards are open to all Australian business women that meet the entry criteria in the following categories: * Westpac Group Business Owner Award (owners with a 50 per cent share or more in a business, with responsibility for key management decision making); * Australian Government Private and Corporate Sector Award (employees in the private and corporate sectors, or owners with less than a 50 per cent share of a business); * Hudson Community and Government Award (employees of government departments, statutory bodies and not - for - profit organisations); * Panasonic Young Business Women's Award (women aged 30 years and under, with any of the above cCorporate Sector Award (employees in the private and corporate sectors, or owners with less than a 50 per cent share of a business); * Hudson Community and Government Award (employees of government departments, statutory bodies and not - for - profit organisations); * Panasonic Young Business Women's Award (women aged 30 years and under, with any of the above ccorporate sectors, or owners with less than a 50 per cent share of a business); * Hudson Community and Government Award (employees of government departments, statutory bodies and not - for - profit organisations); * Panasonic Young Business Women's Award (women aged 30 years and under, with any of the above criteria).

«On the corporate side, we disregard the temporary increase in tax payments in 2018 related to the tax on deemed repatriation; we do not estimate a growth effect from those repatriated profits, either,» the note said.

The deepening relationship between WorleyParsons and the Royal Flying Doctor Service is a prime example of how partnerships between the corporate and not - for - profit sectors are shifting away from being purely financial.

But as United Steelworkers economist Erin Weir points out, «Corporate Canada's goal isn't to increase national productivity, it's to maximize profits.»

A corporate board could not pillage profits that way to top up employees.

Stack shared their resentment of corporate profit, but that was not why he had come.

For Schultz, though, doing the right thing for its own sake — which these days costs a quarter - billion dollars annually in health insurance premiums — wasn't inconsistent with the corporate mission of turning a profit.

At a recent Nasdaq luncheon Q&A, Schultz was challenged about his expansive view of «corporate social responsibility»: Was it not the role of the corporation simply to maximize profits for shareholders, who in turn can use the proceeds to do good in the world if they choose?

The U.S. Supreme Court is clear and straightforward on this, she says: «Modern corporate law does not require for - profit corporations to pursue profit at the expense of everything else, and many do not.»

«Business cycles do not succumb to age alone but rather to a confluence of factors like falling corporate profit margins, slowing productivity growth, and a sharp rise in real policy rates into positive territory.»

Usually, a strong economy leads to strong corporate profits, not the other way round.

I spoke to corporate and not - for - profit directors in Dallas, Texas this week about board dynamics and board renewal.

It is strange, however, to see corporate tax cuts being touted as a job creation strategy, as the benefits of higher productivity are mostly higher wages and profits, not increased employment.

First, corporate investors including Google, Rakuten, Alibaba, Comcast and others have increased their investments in venture and often don't have the same profit motive (and thus pricing motive) as traditional investors.

Mike Moffatt said: «According to the Department of Finance, the benefits from a cut in corporate income taxes may be under stated as their analysis does not capture the effects of multinational firms rearranging their tax reporting so that more profits would be «booked» in Canada.

According to the Department of Finance, the benefits from a cut in corporate income taxes may be under stated as their analysis does not capture the effects of multinational firms rearranging their tax reporting so that more profits would be «booked» in Canada.

The wage pop [last Friday's 2.9 % growth in hourly wages] spooked the markets because investors, already skittish as valuations were a bit steep (though not as bad as people have been saying, given strong current and expected corporate earnings), envisioned this sequence: wage growth gooses price growth (i.e., inflation), which raises both market and Federal Reserve interest rates, which slows growth and shaves corporate profit margins.

The profit illusion created by Jarden's corporate strategy has driven shares up over 230 % in the past five years, to the point where the company's underlying business simply can not justify the share price.

The Institute of Corporate Directors (ICD) is a not - for - profit, member - based association promoting the effectiveness of Canadian directors and boards.

Unfortunately, budget forecasts do not provide a breakdown of the various components of nominal GDP, such as wages and salaries, corporate profits, interest income, etc., so it is difficult to properly assess the impact of changes in the economic forecast to changes in the major components of budgetary revenues.

See Finance 101 and Economic Versus Accounting Profits for more detail on why accounting profits are not reliable indicators of corporate profitability or value crProfits for more detail on why accounting profits are not reliable indicators of corporate profitability or value crprofits are not reliable indicators of corporate profitability or value creation.

Pass - throughs will counter that in many cases, people who own stock through 401 (k) s and IRAs don't have to pay capital gains or dividend taxes, and so their profits are only taxed at the corporate rate, which is lower than the top individual rate (and would be much lower under this plan), putting pass - throughs at a potential disadvantage.

Society of Corporate Secretaries and Governance Professionals is comprised principally of corporate secretaries and business executives in governance, ethics, and compliance functions at public, private, and not - for - profit organCorporate Secretaries and Governance Professionals is comprised principally of corporate secretaries and business executives in governance, ethics, and compliance functions at public, private, and not - for - profit organcorporate secretaries and business executives in governance, ethics, and compliance functions at public, private, and not - for - profit organizations.

Although higher wages add to corporate cost bases, wage acceleration hasn't historically hurt profit margins.

While he said he does not see this as a cause for robust improvement across the board, corporate profits and the GDP will see marginal growth.

He serves on the board of the following not - for - profit organizations: the American College of Corporate Directors, Massachusetts General Hospital (President's Council), Boston University (Trustee Emeritus), The Boston Foundation (Director Emeritus), The Boston Center for Community and Justice (Honorary director), Wilson Center's Canada Institute (Advisory Board) and Quissett Harbor Preservation Trust (Chairman) and Partners HealthCare System, Inc..

The main objection to my argument about the treasury transfer effect is that American companies do not actually repatriate their Canadian profits and pay US corporate tax on them.

An expert in corporate social responsibility, Loren's research interests focus on examining ethical and social responsibility issues in companies, and exploring the relationships between companies and not - for - profit organizations.

We spend lots of time explaining how GAAP earnings are not reliable measures of corporate profits, and non-GAAP earnings are worse.

If you don't buy the notion that the U.S. economy, corporate profits and stocks are poised for further growth in the next 12 months, there's another approach: Get defensive.

The PBO, like us, strongly believes that the Department of Finance should publish their forecasts of the components of national income (e.g., corporate profits) and expenses, rather than claiming that such information can not be released due to «Cabinet Confidence».

GWW is not quite as cheap as some of the other stocks on this list, with a PEBV of 1.2, which means the market expects profits to grow by no more than 20 % from current levels for the remainder of its corporate life.

What many had not priced in was a surge in global growth, which propelled corporate profits.

But corporate profits aren't a binding constraint on anything here.

The job growth is fake, there's been no wage growth since 1999, inflation numbers are false, government debt is too high, corporate profits are too low, corporate profits are unsustainably high, companies aren't reinvesting their profits, companies are buying back too much stock, the Federal Reserve is propping up the market, the Federal Reserve is keeping rates artificially low, and so on.

Put simply, in my view, stock prices are rising not because Wall Street has thoughtfully quantified the effect of taxes, interest rates, corporate profits, or anything else.

The examples include not just well - known socially conscious companies like Ben & Jerry's and Patagonia, but also wildly successful corporate giants who are also profiting by doing good in the world, including General Electric, Toyota, Unilever, Marks and Spencer, and many others.

I understand that startups normally need capital froman an IPO or need to issue more stocks in order to finance R&D (well, as just about all companies pursue immediate profits not at the cost of the future, the second option is becoming forgettable), but what's the point when the whole world is now run by a few corporate cartels?

Finance's estimate for 2012 - 13 appears suspect, considering the incremental increase in cost estimated for 2013 - 14, which is not supported by their projected increase in corporate profits.

According to the Department of Finance website, small businesses earning $ 500,000 of less profit each year pay a separate 3 % small business tax, not the 10 % corporate tax applied to companies earning more than $ 500,000 in profit annually.