Sentences with phrase «n't demonstrate an understanding»

Speaking on his Instagram account, the Catalans» wideman — wearing a wig — appeared to joke about Barca's Champions League quarter - final elimination at the hands of Atletico Madrid, and certainly didn't demonstrate an understanding of the reigning champions» bitter failure.

Today's report from the public accounts committee found government departments couldn't demonstrate an understanding of the risks associated with the strategy.

What's more, is you can quickly view a history of assignments and see if your student: • Completed lessons with demonstrated understanding • Completed lessons but did not demonstrate understanding • Did not complete the lessons

A score of 1.0 indicates that on his or her own the student does not demonstrate understanding of or skill regarding the learning goal, but with help the student does.

Finally a score of 0.0 indicates that even with help the student does not demonstrate understanding or skill relative to the learning goal.

If you can't talk about it in depth in an interview, if you can't demonstrate an understanding of a skill or experience and show how you executed on something, DO N'T LIST IT.»

Not exact matches

The takeaway: Donald Trump may not be utilizing every channel available to him, but he has a strong grasp on understanding his audience, effecting the right messaging and demonstrating how to mix «entertainment» in with his message to improve engagement and truly drive social shares.

Demonstrating that you understand and abide by the culture of your organization shows you not only realize this, but that you also «get» that leaders must guide by example.

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella this month became the latest tech executive to demonstrate, at best, a lack of understanding of the systemic discrimination facing women, suggesting that women not ask for raises in order to have «good karma.»

Even in Shakespeare's play, «The Merchant of Venice,» written more than 400 years ago, the character Antonio demonstrates his understanding of the concept when he says: «I thank my fortune for it — my ventures are not in one bottom trusted, nor to one place, nor is my whole estate upon the fortune of this present year.»

Your financial projections are there to demonstrate your understanding of the fundamental unit economics and scalability of your business model, not to daydream.

He had long sought, he writes, an argument that «would suffice to demonstrate that God truly exists» and grant understanding superior to faith: «I do not seek to understand that I may believe, but I believe in order to understand.»

Since your quote from Leviticus is a directive for the people of Israel who made a covenantal agreement with God for their nation and Christians are not in that covenant nor that position, your childish and ignorance of the basics of understanding ANY text is demonstrated.

Instead of misappropriating celebrity death as a gospel opportunity, I believe we should use it to demonstrate that we understand and relate, not to our culture, but to human beings.

Yet McGrath demonstrates that this single quote was torn badly out of context, and that Tertullian's real attitude was that «there is nothing that God does not wish to be investigated and understood by reason.»

I would go further and say that to dismiss sin as something that tests «God's patience with your underestimation of his love and this is not a good thing to do in your walk with Christ» demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of who God is and what he expects of his children.

Goss is not concerned here with the validity of Whitehead's conception of God, but rather to demonstrate that Camus» writings leave open the possibility of God as understood by Whitehead, and that Camus» thoughts on rebellion and its source in the beauty of nature are compatible with and made consistent by a process notion of God.

Unfortunately, through his many slanted political comments over the years presented in the guise of religion, Franklin Graham demonstrates that he truly does not understand the messages of Jesus Christ.

What matters is whether a Christian in the purity of his faith and his understanding of man joins the struggle and demonstrates by the audacity of his faith, by his love for his neighbour, and his optimism about the future, that he is not just the passive object of history or even of the new society, but rather the co-author and co-architect of the new order.9

As G. E. Bentley Jr.'s critical study of Vala demonstrates, Blake's frequent and disorderly revisions of this manuscript epic reveal his own movement into a Christian and redemptive understanding of history, an understanding that could not be reconciled with the initial direction of the poem.

These few verses clrarly demonstrate the Bible is not a book to be studied and memorized, but a living word to be discerneded spiritually, not by man and his finite understanding.

That being said, for all your words, you have not demonstrated that a god as understood by believers exists.

As research by Schumpeter, Langholm, and others has demonstrated, the notion that the scholastic justum pretium was to be determined by producer «status» does not reflect an accurate understanding of medieval teaching on economic justice.

The Biblical writers do not understand social ethics in terms of one or the other of these human values, but in terms of the nature and activity of God who demonstrated their interconnectedness and indissolubility.

The Bible alone, however, does not have to be used to demonstrate this understanding of marriage.

I can't help but laugh at his lack of intellectual rigor in constructing his position, in which he demonstrates the very lack of depth in understanding he is attributing to the «spiritual but not religious».

Responding to the deterministic predilection of substantialist understandings of the self, he attempts to demonstrate that he does not share the substantialist position.

Whitehead believed it important for geometry and physics to demonstrate that our understanding of straightness does not depend upon measurement.

@ GodFreeNow — Your story is a bit hard to believe based on what you demonstrate in your various posts here (sure, you quote some verses, but you don't seem to have the hermeneutical skills to understand them... much like Rachel)... unless the education programs were pretty horrible at that church.

It's not clear what you've demonstrated here other than a lack of knowledge and a lack of understanding about how arguments are made.

Not surprisingly, we are sometimes startled by these events of understanding, for they demonstrate to us just how little we are in control of texts.

Unless Griffin demonstrates that we are not justified in not broadening our «understanding of experience,» he has not demonstrated what he needs to demonstrate: that others can not justifiably reject his argument — can not justifiably reject his basis for maintaining that no actuality can be totally devoid of power of self - determination.

But we must not fool ourselves by thinking that because the archeologist proved that Solomon did have a copper smelter on the Gulf of Aqaba and a horse - trading business at Megiddo, he has thereby demonstrated that the biblical understanding of Solomon is true.

Whereas you suggest that it is the Jesuit tendency, as demonstrated in Pope Francis, to subordinate human and divine law to a missionary end, St. Ignatius understands the subversion of divine law as leading not to salvation, but to damnation.

If I understand him correctly, he believes that by making rational arguments we can see, for example, that the owners of Hobby Lobby, the Greens, are not asking for an exemption, but demonstrating why the contraceptive mandate is not a law, and is therefore not binding on anyone.

First, the interest in bodily resurrection demonstrates that Christians understood the person as composed of soul and body, not primarily as soul.

Knowing that God is using me in some small way to demonstrate Jesus to those whose knowledge and understanding of Him have been distorted or destroyed is an incredible blessing for which I do not deserve.

The fact that we don't think this is just demonstrates that we do not understand the seriousness of the offense.

True faith would be demonstrated by accepting that since God didn't bring about the end of days then there must a reason for it that we can not understand.

How do all this work, I can not begin to understand of imagine but I do know this, Christ's death was more than just to demonstrate God hated death and blood.

I'm not sure I understand how the above demonstrates hatred of women.

But he rarely demonstrated any very keen awareness of the ways in which, for instance, Plato's understanding of the Form of the Good, or certain Christian understandings of the analogy between transcendent and created being (and so on), open up paths that certainly can not terminate in nihilism.

There is no real answer to the question you have posed because this club has once again hedged their bets on doing the bare minimum then hoping for the best... if they were serious about changing the stagnant culture that has permeated the club since our move from the Highbury, we would have immediately released and / or moved several players in the early days of the window... this would have demonstrated to the fans that they were serious about addressing our obvious inadequacies... likewise this would have forced them to bring in replacements because they couldn't have used the lame excuse Wenger is presently spewing about having too many players... we functionally have the same amount of players as we did when the window first opened but he didn't say jack about it then... he simply waited until the inevitable happened then pulled out his excuse Rolodex, closed his eyes and randomly drew the «too many players» card... the more he opens his mouth, the more I understand his «god» complex when it relates to all things Arsenal... what other manager could continually do the same dumb shit, not address obvious concerns for years, speak to the fans in such a condescending manner, face enormous criticism from many of his former star players and be the architect of so many failed player signings yet be one of the highest paid managers with the longest tenure in Europe... maybe Kroenke is colourblind and instead of seeing all the red flags he can only see the GREEN ones ($ $ $)

I vow to not contribute in any way financially to Arsenal, (tickets, merchandise etc) until the manager and board demonstrate understanding direction and ambition.

However, despite his performances of late not quite matching up to his early season form, he still has the talent and ability to secure three points single - handedly, and his understanding with Eden Hazard — as demonstrated in the 1 - 0 victory over QPR — gives the Blues a threat that the Gunners currently lack.

You clearly can't understand as aptly demonstrated by the author of the original post.

Someone who can explain many safe ways to comfort babies is not only demonstrating experience, but also that they understand that each little child has different needs.

However, if our instructor — or parent — can patiently demonstrate the correct way to play the song, or clean the wall, or drive the car, then the lesson is deeply understood, often not repeated, and everyone's dignity remains intact.

It would be one thing to say, «it's ok, I'd rather die an agonizing death with an undelivered fetus after 72 hours of labour than have a c - section and a live baby so why don't you just prescribe me some morphine so I can go home and gather my family» which would be bizarre but at least demonstrate understanding of the consequences.

These honest and highly personal stories from fathers who have chosen to speak out and live openly with HIV, not only serve to demonstrate the complexity of parenting in the context of HIV / AIDS, but also act as a catalyst to better understand how the world needs to respond to the epidemic.»