Sentences with phrase «n't do simple math»

Sorry, just can't get over all the «rules» you so called «investors» want to use... if you can't do simple math, dig ditches and get out of real estate!

Avant is a scam!!!! Don't use them to for loans - they lie, does not provide financial statements, poor customer service, they hire people who can't do simple math and on top of it all - they want more of your money!!!! They will completely screw you and their managers - they will act like nothing happened and will NOT help you!!!

Managers complain about employees who don't get to work on time, can't do simple math, can't run a register — or even worse, misfits who lick taco shells, bathe in the utility sink or do unspeakable things to the nachos.

Numbers don't lie, it is now obvious that not only can you not do simple math, you can not read and comprehend simple words.

I'm sorry, but ten thousand so called scientists that can not do the simplest math is not science.

@Jeff — that's right, all those scientists can't do simple maths.

Not exact matches

«If you just do some simple math in terms of Canada's share of the global marketplace, then it's not a gigantic number — it's in the low hundreds of millions or high tens of millions,» says Johal.

I don't know exactly what's going to happen, but simple math based on the current level of interest rates leads me to believe that these risk premiums will be much wider in the future over longer time frames than they've been in the recent past.

Very simple math just make sure you do it before not after raising money.

Some of the reason is simple math: R - rated movies just don't make as much money as PG - 13 movies do, so studios are eager to chop their films into relatively tame affairs.

Last year he couldn't even do simple math, this year he is on honor roll.

It has been some time since I was at school, Arsenal fans, but I was pretty good at maths and I am sure my memory has not failed me to the point where I can not do a simple sum like adding and subtracting, but maybe it has because the numbers concerning the amount of money available to Arsene Wenger to fund the transfer deals he wanted this summer just does not add up.

«And don't forget the simple maths: a Tory vote converted to Labour is worth twice that of a non-voter converted to Labour, towards a win in a particular seat.»

- Adam Kucharski — Keep it simple, stupid: maths doesn't have to be «complex» - Princess Ojiaku — It's what you see at the concert, not what you hear - Krystal D'Costa -LSB-...]

But «math ed., properly done, is actually more challenging than mathematics, and that's because simple systems sit still and people don't.»

By doing some simple first grade level math (3000 - 2500 = 500), you can see that there are 500 left over calories that are taken in but NOT used by the body.

Why would any half sane person change their diet for a 1 % improvment — they wonld not — apparently people in this country can't do simple third grade math — which makes one wonder?

Although our data do not allow us to address this issue directly while still accounting for the self - selection of students into charter schools, simple comparisons indicate that students who entered charter schools in the later grades made smaller gains in math (but not reading) than students who entered earlier.

The math is simple: the federal government is spending a trillion dollars a year it doesn't have, entitlements are on an unsustainable course, and nobody wants to raise taxes on the 98 % of families earning less than $ 250,000 a year.

When working a complex problem you not only want to pull simple math facts from memory, you want to do so quickly, so that the other work can proceed apace.

I do appreciate the answer, but I did the math, and it is not a simple RC circuit.

Simple math clarifies the fact that, unfortunately, the monthly Canadian data from 2012 does not add up to the year end total.

It may not have the same old - school charm as your drawer full of paper scraps filled with scribbles detailing famous Scrabble victories, but it's delightfully simple (and doesn't require anybody to do on - the - fly math).

On the other hand, simple math disproves the theory that «it doesn't matter that crap exists».

They don't understand that mathematically, over a series of trades, a trader can lose a majority of their trades and still be widely profitable, simple math proves this.

The good news is that you don't need a credit utilization calculator — the math is simple.

The guy is supposed to be a financial guru and he can't even do the simple math on what it would cost to get a debt consolidation loan.

While doesn't take complicated math to see how much you can earn, you may be surprised at the value of this simple Membership Rewards card.

I realized that a healthy approach towards money isn't so much about doing simple math and deciding to just save more....

So I continue to contribute to the new car fund — not because the math supports it (it obviously doesn't) but because of the simple fact that in 10 years or less, I will be car shopping once again.

If you don't believe it, let's do a simple math exercise.

From what I am told: My initial investment will attract a 5 % bonus in the GWB each year I do nt touch it until I am 65 when I can begin withdrawing 5 % a year from GWB — so for simple math... an initial $ 100K left in for 15 years will have a GWB of $ 105K after year1, $ 110K after year 2, $ 115k after year 3 etc with an ultimate GWB of $ 175K after 15 year — I then can withdraw a guaranteed income for the rest of my life.

Which is why I think this partially has not caught on — because people do that quick, simple math and they go...

I also try to identify who might be the right sort of person for a given book — some people don't like math, some books are too simple, some are too hard, etc..

Let's do some simple mathy math that won't cause your eyeballs to roll back into your head.

What this means is that depending on your situation, you are better off taking the hit in taxes paying to withdraw your 401K today and have your money grow tax free than keeping it and paying later (do the math, it's simple math — if you don't know pull a # from the air and do the math).

«If we do some simple math and assume that the numbers remain the same, that's $ 560,000 a year multiplied by 14 years, which means the current total spent enforcing a ban that doesn't work could potentially be estimated at: $ 7,840,000.»

It's simple math, I don't really understand how people how so much trouble understanding it.

No tactics involved, just a simple calculation on your behalf, and whilst math may trouble some of us, it essentially gets to the point where you don't have to consider what the enemy is or does, you can just charge in and pound until dead.

The only problem with all the predictions about the level of the World Ocean rising is that, the World Ocean is refusing to rise up in support of the predictions, the other problem is that ice is frozen fresh water and frozen fresh water only covers about 5 % of this planet above sea level and frozen water under the level of the World Ocean does not count as the World Ocean will fall a small amount if that ice melts, so if the ice there is enough to get the World Ocean to rise and significant amount then it must be piled up very high, I cubic kilometer of water as ice, should it melt, would make 1000 square kilometers rise by one meter, so when you use this simple math then somewhere on the planet, above the level of the sea, then there must be over 500,000 cubic kilometers of ice, piled up and just waiting to melt, strange that no one can find that amount of ice, all these morons who talk about the rise of the World Ocean in tens of meters, this includes you Peter Garrett or Mr. 7 Meters, the ice does not exist to allow this amount of rise in the World Ocean, it is just not there.

The basic understanding of greenhouse gas warming, human fossil fuel combustion, and the simple math this article uses to reach the conclusion you don't like is very straightforward.

So this looks like pretty simple math: 150 meters X 0.8 C / 100m = 1.2 C is the approximate temperature change that can be registered by the upper treeline (since at 150 meters below, where it is 1.2 C warmer, the trees don't respond to the temperature surge with a growth surge).

Tom Murphy from «Do The Math» blog has a great little video titled «Growth Has An Expiration Date» the math and the basic physics behind it are really simple, it doesn't take a PhD in advanced mathematics or physics to understand it.

«you made the same lying, distortion of scientific facts as you are doing here» «People like you disgust me» «don't you ever get tired of being shown how wrong and stupid you are» «Do your work colleagues realize how poor you are at math and statistics (not to mention reading simple words and numbers)?&raquDo your work colleagues realize how poor you are at math and statistics (not to mention reading simple words and numbers)?»

As Mr Obama says, it's simple math, and the math just doesn't work.

That we don't see mass layoffs of male - dominated corporate law departments, to be replaced by supposedly less - costly - to - hire females, or lawsuits based on discrimination, suggests there are other explanations for the numbers than the simple math presented here.

Essentially, Digit is Simple Bank's «Goals» feature — automatic savings that you don't have to worry about — but with a lot more math that makes it a smarter robot.

Somehow, simple maths does not appeal to many investors Do go through the following post.

The builder made it even bigger and now it's huge It seems our project manager wasn't good at reading the plans or doing simple math either.