Sentences with phrase «n't eat any more of it»

Not exact matches

The campaign isn't just about touting Sobeys» produce section, but also encouraging shoppers to eat more greens and to find new ways of adding veggies into everyday cooking.

So, yes, there is a decline in the restaurant industry's sales, but it's probably more because of how relatively expensive it is to eat out, not the back - and - forth between Trump and Clinton.

«In some of our markets the reality is that we haven't been changing at the same rate as customers» eating - out expectations — or more specifically, their expectations of us at McDonald's,» he said on the call.

In other words, exercising after a long period of not eating could set us up for a longer, more intense fat burn, noted Eric Doucet, the lead author on the study and a professor of kinesiology at the University of Ottowa.

Plus when you drink a bottle of water before you eat, when you sit down at the table you'll already feel a little more full and won't be as tempted to eat past the point of hunger.

While this is a blow to the idea that nationwide calorie menu requirements will dramatically alter the way America eats, it doesn't necessarily mean the policy is useless: perhaps, as the authors speculate, it may be more effective in sit - down restaurants where dining expectations are different, or for specific groups of particularly health - concious diners.

Eating a mid-afternoon meal replacement bar doesn't just bridge the lunch and dinner gap, it's an easy way to get in the habit of eating smaller meals more frequEating a mid-afternoon meal replacement bar doesn't just bridge the lunch and dinner gap, it's an easy way to get in the habit of eating smaller meals more frequeating smaller meals more frequently.

The memory - eating disease, expected to afflict 15 million Americans by 2060 (and tens of millions more around the world as life expectancy increases), has no cure; a new drug for the condition hasn't been approved in well over a decade; initially promising experimental treatments seem to be failing with clockwork regularity; and there's not even a definitive consensus on what, exactly, biopharma companies should focus on while developing Alzheimer's medicines.

While Fredette's job isn't always glamorous (it involves frequent meetings with the company's marketing and consumer research departments), more than 50 % of his time is spent in the kitchen, where he experiments with flavor pairings, makes ingredients, develops recipes, mixes test batches, and yes — eats a lot of ice cream.

Sadly, Zuckerberg did not say much more about baked goods for people who really just want to be eating cake in the morning, maybe because he realized the limits of the analogy.

«After more than a decade of our eating biotech foods, there has not been a single scientifically confirmed case of human illness that can be attributed to food biotechnology,» he writes.

It's nice to know if something you want to eat more of is healthy, but intellectual ideas don't motivate.

If you want to eat less junk food, instead of trying not to eat potato chips, eat more fruits, nuts, carrots, and other quick healthy food.

Some days you can find a burger or lasagna oozing with cheese in the Cantina — we haven't taken an abstinence - only approach to nutrition management — but on an average day, more than half of our employees eat a salad, even when presented with yummier choices.

And the ideal road toll should properly reflect the amount of road being used — in the same manner that people who eat a lot of bananas pay more than those who don't.

You will not only burn more calories eating a series of smaller meals but also avoid the afternoon crash and end of the workday slump.

«They want to make up their own dictionary version of what meat is, and these are people who do not eat meat,» says Suzanne Strassburger, whose family has been in the meat business for more than 150 years.

For example, Crockpot it if you don't cook to eat cheap and healthy and gain tips on what to do with leftover turkey slices, how to make various curries and make tons of beans more palatable.

«Ten percent less fat,» might not actually mean very much less fat, and it does not necessarily mean that you can eat more of it or that it is really more healthful.

«Repeatedly, and in different ways, throughout this book, you actually demonstrate with a generous mix of insight and proven examples, how» dog - eat - dog» marketing simply isn't necessary; how ethical marketing is not only easier to implement but far more effective!

If being able to more easily purchase meat and poultry raised without antibiotics is important to you, Halloran has this advice: «Wherever you eat, ask restaurant managers about their meat sourcing policies and practices and make sure they know that you're looking for options that are healthier not only for you but for the animals and the environment, too — including meat produced without the routine use of antibiotics.»

If you want to eat less junk food, instead of trying not to eat potato chips, eat more fruits, nuts, carrots, and other quick food.

I am not big with cooking pies and dessert in general, but had quite a chunk of butter left and there was no way I would eat it all on... Read more

«The later stages of the 2009 — 2017 bull market are a valuation illusion built on share buyback alchemy... The technique optically reduces the price - to - earnings multiple because the denominator doesn't adjust for the reduced share count... Share buybacks are a major contributor to the low volatility regime because a large price insensitive buyer is always ready to purchase the market on weakness... Share buybacks result in a lower volatility, lower liquidity, which in turn incentivizes more share buybacks, further incentivizing passive and systematic strategies that are short volatility in all their forms... Like a snake eating its own tail, the market can not rely on share buybacks indefinitely to nourish the illusion of growth.

Transaction costs can eat up a significant portion of your yield if you are not careful; trading more efficiently is always a good idea.

So how do you go from that reasoning to «Since it wasn't accidental then it must have been this ancient male diety named (fill in blank depending on religion) who loves me and knows me and cares for me and wants me to perform rituals that have nothing to do with morality like prayer, not eating certain things, sabaath and many more just because he said so, even though we have no record of him saying anything, just records of humans who wrote things down that they claim he said, but I want to believe it all so badly I will base my beliefs on no other evidence than «it just can't be accident».

«Doing this challenge during the 30 days of Ramadan is even more of a test as I won't be eating or drinking during the day.»

A more reasonable argument against wine is made based on an interpretation of Romans 14:21: «It is better not to eat meat or drink wine or to do anything else that will cause your brother to fall.»

Why does God have to tell you people everything... maybe he wants you to figure out on your own that these aren't the days of the flood any more, there are plenty of things to eat besides killing one of his defenseless creatures.

According to the Bible God hated more than he loved, and the crap that is the 1st few books of the old testament, which s barbaric and evil, not only to those men that are an abombanation, but those that not only eat pork, but touch a football, shellfish, work on the sabbath, blasphamy, slaves who do nt allow there master to sleep with there wifes / daughters, and those that dared not idolise him because he is a jealous and vengeful God!

The study, published in the January edition of the British Journal of Psychiatry, says spiritual but not religious people, as opposed to people who are religious, agnostic or atheist, were more likely to develop a «mental disorder,» «be dependent on drugs» and «have abnormal eating attitudes,» like bulimia and anorexia.

Tearfund said a third of all food produced globally is not eaten and waste on this scale is «fueling climate change, causing more droughts, floods and less reliable rain, making life harder for the people in poverty across the world that Tearfund works with».

Emmanuel Levinas says, «Life is love of life, a relationship with contents that are not my being but more dear than my being; thinking, eating, sleeping, reading, working, warming oneself in the sun.»

Although I can not prove the existence of God to anyone, including myself, he is more real to me than the food I eat.

And her comparison between loving Christ and loving eating could not be more evangelical: you stop loving Christ if you make him into an idol so that he is no longer the God exposed in the flesh, born of poor and displaced parents, in a stable amid animals, dung and flies, who hung helpless on a cross and who promised to be among the hungry, the sick, the little ones of all ages, in every street child.

She discusses theology intelligently, stating the case for obedience even more strongly than did God: «From the fruit of the tree that is in the midst of the garden, God said, «You shall not eat from it and you shall not touch it, lest you die.

This is the time of year we start to think about what we have or don't have, usually spurring on our New Year's resolutions to eat healthier, start working out more or accomplish something we've always wanted to do but never tried.

Unlike the Christian god that wouldn't ever change his mind or doctrine... except for cursing the world for eating an apple... except for telling Abraham to sacrifice his son, but then stopping him... and except for killing nearly all life on Earth and then because of the guilt says I'll never to do that ever again - in exactly that way... and except for deciding that 2 of himself (Father and Spirit) weren't enough any more, and creating / fathering / spiriting as Son... and except for forgiving all sin, when «In the beginning» he had cursed the universe for the eating of an apple, by having his creation torture and kill his only begotten Son... and except for having to repeat himself about the unchanging eternal rules, to Abraham, Moses, Jesus, Saul / Paul, Mohammed, Joseph Smith, Bahá «u «lláh, David Koresh, and a whole host of others... and except for... and except for...

So what makes these prayers any more ridiculous than praying for world peace, or a loved one to recover from an illness, or strength to not eat a whole bucket of KFC.

«I prefer a church which is bruised, hurting and dirty because it has been out on the streets, rather than a church which is unhealthy from being confined and from clinging to its own security... More than by fear of going astray, my hope is that we will be moved by the fear of remaining shut up within structures which give us a false sense of security, within rules which make us harsh judges, within habits which make us feel safe, while at our door people are starving and Jesus does not tire of saying to us: «Give them something to eat.»»

Eating dinner isn't like this; making love isn't like this; national identity isn't, for most of us, like this: all these are mere parts of our identity, elements to be placed in a larger and more encompassing context.

And if a friendship can not survive the setting of boundaries, we must question whether it ever was very deep: Was the friend anything more than a consumer, eating up our time and affections?

For example, the man who fasts develops strength of will because he decides not to eat or drink; he becomes more considerate of his fellowmen; he becomes pious and virtuous; his spirit is enlightened and his body becomes clean of sin.

Essentially, James Alison seemed to be arguing that original sin wasn't eating forbidden fruit, but in in the improper imitation of God, and (more importantly), trying to cover up what we have done by blaming others for our own actions.

Why is it that we continue to flock to megachurches, eat hungrily from the hands of prosperity - gospel preachers and buy Christian - living books that aren't much more than humanistic doctrine camouflaged as biblical exhortation?

You don't need to grab the biggest piece of cake any more, because you are one body, and her eating it is as good as your eating it.

The woman, for her part, also says the thing which is not, albeit in innocence: she answers not the question that was asked, says more than was called for, identifies the forbidden tree as the one «in the midst of the garden,» adds «neither shall ye touch it» to the prohibition, and, most importantly, converts the predicted consequences of disobedience («for in the day thou eatest thereof, dying you will die»; 2:17) into the reason for obedience («Ye shall not eat of it... lest you die»; 3:3).

Yeah, your god had to sacrifice himself to himself to appease himself so that he doesn't torture more than 99.99 % of his creation for all eternity because our great - great grandmother talked to a snake and wrongly ate a piece of fruit before she understood what «wrong» was.

Out - of - control eating seems so awful it can not even be talked about in public; discussing masturbatory practices and sexual preferences would be easier — and more socially acceptable — than discussing fantasies and fetishes having to do with food.

If it is true that there is more heavenly rejoicing over the lost sheep that is found than over the sheep that have not strayed, God's embrace shows one important sense in which the history that began with the eating of forbidden fruit in the Garden and that will end in the heavenly city is a good one.