They are focusing their efforts to this goal, so they don't fail at this point like most of the other exchanges.
Not exact matches
There are still plenty of ways for it to
fail once it gets off the ground — the structure could be torn apart by supersonic shockwaves or the side boosters may
not separate, since that system has never been tested, for example — but
at that
point, SpaceX could probably launch another Falcon Heavy within a few months.
All of them
failed at one
point, but none would have been successful if they hadn't pushed themselves.
But when you ask what to do about it, that consensus quickly devolves into finger -
pointing —
at recycling companies like Waste Management for
failing to innovate,
at the American public for their lazy recycling habits,
at producers for creating plastic packaging that is increasingly difficult to recycle, and even
at the federal government for
not passing strong legislation that encourages better practices.
They
failed to discriminate between securitised products and did
not adequately question why one AAA - rated product was
at a margin of 20
points over swap but another was trading
at 100
points over.
You're
not always right, but
at least you're modest and humble,
pointing out where a chart
failed and always showing people what to watch out for and where to place stops.
Not that I would dream of rehearsing the controversy again; but I will note that, at the time, I took my general point to be not that natural - law theory is inherently futile, but rather that its proponents often fail to grasp just how nihilistic the late modern view of reality has become, or how far our culture has gone toward losing any coherent sense of «nature» at all, let alone of any realm of moral meanings to which nature might afford acce
Not that I would dream of rehearsing the controversy again; but I will note that,
at the time, I took my general
point to be
not that natural - law theory is inherently futile, but rather that its proponents often fail to grasp just how nihilistic the late modern view of reality has become, or how far our culture has gone toward losing any coherent sense of «nature» at all, let alone of any realm of moral meanings to which nature might afford acce
not that natural - law theory is inherently futile, but rather that its proponents often
fail to grasp just how nihilistic the late modern view of reality has become, or how far our culture has gone toward losing any coherent sense of «nature»
at all, let alone of any realm of moral meanings to which nature might afford access.
I can't comment as to your
point, because you've
failed so hard
at the written word that it's unidentifiable...
And when our discourse was brought to that
point, that the very highest delight of the earthly senses... was, in respect of the sweetness of that life,
not only
not worthy of comparison, but
not even of mention; we raising up ourselves with a more glowing affection towards the «Self - same,» did by degrees pass through all things bodily, even the very heaven whence sun and moon and stars shine upon the earth; yea, we were soaring higher yet, by inward musing, and discourse, and admiring of Thy works; and we came to our own minds, and went beyond them, that we might arrive
at that region of never -
failing plenty, where Thou feedest Israel for ever with the food of truth.
I need them to know that I'm
not God because otherwise when I
fail them — and I'm
not so ridiculous as to think that I won't
fail them spectacularly
at some
point — they will
not only have their hearts broken but their faith shattered.
If you don't believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God,
at this
point in the Gospel, then John's efforts will have been wasted and the Gospel will have
failed.»
Translation: «As Christians we really can't prove anything about our belief, therefore we must
point out in others how they
fail at following our popular religion and what people traditionally associated with it.
(4) Biblical texts must be understood in their human context: for otherwise we shall
fail to read their real
point out of them and instead read into them
points they are
not making
at all.
So, for instance, if it is
not clear to the readers of my work that my writing is done by an Episcopalian Christian, I will have
failed to practice this virtue — which, of course, includes my making clear
at which
points the materials I study or engage seem to me false, noxious, or incomplete; just as it includes my making clear when and in what ways it seems to me that the materials I engage are true, have taught me something I didn't know before, or may be of use to me and my community in its search to apprehend and incarnate the gospel.
We tend to forget that humans (religious or
not) will
fail at some
point or another and will
not get everything right.
Poor Rabshakeh,
at this
point too he
fails to see that this God is
not like his own gods, that the Lord does
not punish forever, that he
not only unleashes the scourge but also holds it back, that he finds no satisfaction in the Assyrian terror and the church's misery, that he does
not will the death of the sinner and hence does
not will the final victory of Assyria.
What you don't seem to understand, or
at least
fail to acknowledge, is that there aren't any facts that exclusively
point to Creationism or Christianity, while there are reams of papers on the facts supporting geology and evolution.
The
point at which communication frequently breaks down is
not in the speaking or the listening, per se, but in
failing to check frequently to see if one really hears and understands what the other means, feels, and intends.
So many people
failed to fill out that last question that it was obvious they didn't trust what I'd said; clearly, I would need to look
at what they had written and decide
at what
points counseling was needed.
We dare
not be derelict in our duty
at this
point, for if we have
failed here we have
failed almost everywhere.
Pleas know — I am
not trying to put anything in your wound... I am one that made it through my pit (Psalm 40) I stopped blaming circumstances and spent many hours mad, crying, angry all the stuff
at God... I don't know why or how but I ended up in helping situations during the hardest time... it was crazy... I spoke
at churches that were driven —
failing and those
not driven thriving (but those thriving had vision and direction) but
not driven to the
point of believing they were the best or anything like that.
At one
point Michael Phayer writes that the Vatican
failed to offer leadership because «by temperament Pius did
not know how to react to genocide.»
god destoryed the world with water because HE
failed to create a creation that would follow rules... what kind of god
fails at creating something that won't follow its rules to the
point of global destruction / cleansing?
Give it a rest, because even a bully in a school yard would know that out of nothing nothing happens, but of course it would take the nerd to conceive what the bully would
not get even perhaps
at a ripe old age, that what was always before the something which lead to the «thing» on the bully's hand was the Infinite and that what's on the bully's hand can be infinitely divided, or that between the bully's pinky and thumb exists an infinity in itself, as is between the number 1 and another number 1 (one unit and another unit), which make 2, or that the bully's hand will
at one infinitely minute
point in time disolve into the INFINITE, give it a rest Tom, Tom with the spelling, since you can
not comprehend what lays between the fine letters, let alone conceive the truth, and distill knowledge from the ore your inadequate imagination
fails to mine.
One might fairly ask
at what
point our Secular Fundamentalists and moral libertarians might feel disposed to concede that their prescriptions for society have
not achieved their aims and have, instead,
failed — and
failed dismally with the most damaging consequences for the stability of society and the happiness of the generality of its members.
I know it's going to hurt but
at the end of the day I think we'll be better off with no cups and 7th or 8th That doesn't mean I want us to
fail, I'll still be cheering every goal, every
point, every win and every success like I have been for 60 years
I'm getting annoyed that people
fail to notice the positive he did recently (he started spending money, keep the team in tact, getting a new physio in, try to win game ugly when result is getting bad) while it is very fair
points that he made very wrong judgement in
not getting enough defensive cover, and his players are naive
at time in term of tactics.
At some point, especially with a pitcher, we have to say he can not keep failing, because failing is not learning; succeeding is learning, even at a lesser leve
At some
point, especially with a pitcher, we have to say he can
not keep
failing, because
failing is
not learning; succeeding is learning, even
at a lesser leve
at a lesser level.
Add David Luis for 30 and drag his Brazil boy Lucas for 20 and Sanchez seing this will extend, just pay him 25 in combine bonus and salary... It's
not about winter or summer window but who we need and smart moves when we best timing which we
fail to in everyway for years... I'm keep
pointing since summer window a such obvious stunner potential star for arsenal attack named Dembele
at Celtic, as Lukaku, Everton after him... He'll be like Cantona or Ibra for Arsenal,
not Henry but as shinning.
They'd rather wait for the one time it
fails so they can bash You blame the manager for being favourist yet a fellow blogger praising a player he previously bashed is called being two faced You kill Ramsey for a blind pass attempting to enter the opposition final third yet you won't blame Sanchez for turning over the ball in a pointless dribble with three free team mates You kill metersacker for deflecting a shot into his own net but won't touch kos for getting out of the way of a shot he could have sufficiency blocked You claim with no substantial proof that arteta, mert, Ramsey, can
not lead arsenal anywhere substantial yet they have each
at a
point been a massive cause for stability and progress when called upon Even after reading this comment, you will ignore the fact that kos was awful until partnerd with mert, our defensive mid with song leaked more goals than the one with arteta and we've struggled to win without him
at least until late last season.
There are various theories about why the Gunners keep falling short in the race for the Premier League title and our various and numerous injury problems certainly do
not help, but it is the way that the team
fails to turn up
at times in crucial games, such as the EPL defeat by Wartford recently or the Champions League hammering
at the hands of Bayern Munich that many will
point to as evidence that the boss is
not getting the best from his squad anymore.
am tired of wenger.the man has got good skills, but somehow he
fails to address basic issues in the team like buying a striker and a cdm in the last summer.
at one time, arsenal had good squad but had a keeper who
at times committed mistakes i.e almunia.then after ozil came and arsenal were first in december, all wenger had to do was buy a pacy striker with eye for goal.but wenger did
nt so obviously and instead bought an injured kallstrom.agreed ppl fans will keep saying managers shud hav played this guy or that one and so.but in case of wenger, its abt ignoring team issues t (to prove a
point he can win without listening to critics and the fans which he never will), and then playing players out of form, out of position, and buying players that do
nt fit ur style like giroud!!
You don't get it do you?I'm
not even talking about the money.But I agree with you that for the kind of money that will be spent on Mbappe it's a higher gamble.Henry was bought to be a starter and as the main man for Arsenal.He was so young by then and the pressure on him was massive.Looking
at the impact he's had in our club if Henry had
failed who would imagine what Arsene would have done.To me he's our best player ever.Arsene put a lot of trust in him to be honest but the gamble paid off.However, I think he had a
point to prove to world and to Juve hence he succeeded.The same as is with Mbappe with even a higher transfer fee and more expectation.If he's ever signed for that amount he's coming here to be the main man whowill send us into glory.Forget Ozchez for all eyes will be on him.
You might blame Wenger and I will blame Gazidis, either way that partnership has
failed us fans countless years, I know Wenger isn't strong
at transfers and will agree with other fans on that
point... but isn't that why managers have support?
It worked brilliantly vs man city but
failed against tottenham but i wouldn't blame the philosophy, if you compare the two you see we were missing OX who i think would've tore the spuds a new one and who in my opinion has
at this
point surpassed walcott defensively and offensively.
Well im
not in a wonderland he has his
failings as we all do and great teams find a way to win good teams sit where we are 6 -5-4 but thats besides the
point and it would be nice if your aunty had bolocks cause then we d be second but ive watched the games were an offensive team most the time although were terrible in the pissing rain but for the most part the game plans have worked weve created chances quality scoring chances one after the other problem is for me the finishing unless we sit back with 9 man behind the ball or ten when you push forward you will give up a goal if you lousy forwards
fail to finish the set ups have been there this year but our strikers have
failed to kill the games if we create quality chances and grab leads in the first 60 minutes like we have for the most part and in those games those games should of been killed even if we give a goal or two alongside the strategy but we
failed to hit multiple should be goals we tried laca we'll see abou auba although hes a bit lazy so far but we'll see but we've lacked that quality in front goal a player the chances have been there im looking
at the failure of the strikers and maybe that is his fault but monreal has scored as many goals recently as our strikers and thats sad our defenders or a midfielder will score and our stikers cant tally one in th first 60 mins of a game alongside them then were tired for last 40 give them hope there still only down one and we rue our missed chances while they push thats where iv been frustrated with this season
not the tactics but the finishing
So for me,
not making 80
points, in how many years now, including the 7 years
failing to make it past the round of 16 in the Champions league, plus completely missing the champions league this year, plus the 10 - 2 humiliation
at Bayern, plus the way we sleepwalked through 5 away defeats, throwing away games that were in our complete control like Everton away for example, and so and so on, is nothing short of failure.
5) Ings — a free signing but would
not have made it
at Arsenal and with sturridge returning from injury and of course rogers has a big
point to prove for paying such high price for benteke and will keep playing him even if he
fails.
Club captain Per Mertesacker and vice-captain Laurent Koscielny will return in short order, and while this may
not solve the problem completely — one's old and slow, the other's semi-permacrocked, and Arsenal gonna Arsenal — we need to
at least see Arsenal
failing at full strength before we can truly
point and laugh.
At the present time we are 36 points behind City — our two worst seasons over the last 60 years was the 1960 - 61 season when we finished 25 points behind the spuds (12.5 wins behind) and the 1994 - 95 season where we finished 38 points behind (12.33 wins behind) Should we fail to win the EL which is a real possibility and we finish 40 odd points behind the leaders it will surely spell the end for not just Wenger but for a lot of people at Arsenal — Bould and the backroom staff for sure and many of the player
At the present time we are 36
points behind City — our two worst seasons over the last 60 years was the 1960 - 61 season when we finished 25
points behind the spuds (12.5 wins behind) and the 1994 - 95 season where we finished 38
points behind (12.33 wins behind) Should we
fail to win the EL which is a real possibility and we finish 40 odd
points behind the leaders it will surely spell the end for
not just Wenger but for a lot of people
at Arsenal — Bould and the backroom staff for sure and many of the player
at Arsenal — Bould and the backroom staff for sure and many of the players.
It has been some time since I was
at school, Arsenal fans, but I was pretty good
at maths and I am sure my memory has
not failed me to the
point where I can
not do a simple sum like adding and subtracting, but maybe it has because the numbers concerning the amount of money available to Arsene Wenger to fund the transfer deals he wanted this summer just does
not add up.
Du
n no about everyone else, but for me personally he loses any brownie
points he'd get for that because it is painfully evident that he only does it because his every attempt
at stirring up a money fight
fails.
He had a reasonably comfortable run to the title too, and despite
failing to score
at all in the final two race in Jerez still beat runner - up Pierre Gasly (who didn't win a race all season) by 35
points.
Though Mike Evans continues to pork me on Draftkings, as he's yet to have a 100 - yard game this season and hasn't scored since October 22nd, the Bucs have scored
at least 20
points in four straight games — something they had
failed to do in the three weeks prior.
Thank God there's someone that is
not so quick to blame it on Wenger...
at one
point the players have to look
at themselves sometimes... we dominate but
not score enough when we have to finish it off either we make a terrible mistake (this time it was Ospina & our bad defending) OR we
fail to score when we should... The selection was spot on and we should've done better... I believe we tend to underestimate some teams in UCL thinking with the quality we have no problem: BUT IT IS.
You can have worldclass players
at your disposal, but u will
fail if you do
not know how to pick your team and what tactic to use
at every
point in time.
If
at any
point you
fail the checklist of Balor, he doesn't get a title win.
Ill simply say this when a man
fails to address the problems in his squad before the season even begins do you really expect that
not to come back and bite you in the Arse
at some
point?
However, although he did the next three races, he didn't score in any of them (even
failing to qualify
at Monaco),
at which
point he put his focus back on his racing commitments in the USA.
They have
failed to pick any
point from their opening three games but one can
not rule them out of causing an upset
at the Emirates Stadium going by their performance last timeout against Manchester City.