Sentences with phrase «n't fit the argument»

Horizontal and vertical evolution don't fit your argument here.

Perhaps not, because it doesn't fit your argument.

So either I'm a politico (as I dislike politics and politicians, I doubt it) or at least one person doesn't fit the argument here.

Not exact matches

«I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist»... book you should check out explaining the arguments for God and why the God of the Bible is the most fitting explanation for what we see in the world.

The problem is, when read in isolation, Romans 13 doesn't fit well with Paul's argument in the rest of the epistle.

William of Ware, Scotus» teacher at Oxford, devised the argument «it was possible, it was fitting and therefore God did it» in order to defend the Immaculate Conception (an argument sometimes erroneously attributed to Scotus himself) but it is not certain whether this was before or after his pupil had so brilliantly defended the doctrine in public disputation in Paris.

I would say he makes the perfect argument that religion and god are manmade because if god was perfect, he wouldn't have to change himself to fit man.

and because what is being asked doesn't fit in with what they choose to do... they reject God and use whatever arguments are at hand to support their position.

And it's a weak argument at best, twisting words to fit an agenda but not addressing a false prophecy that disproves your belief and quantifies it as myth alongside other religions.

I hereby hold atheists incapable of holding any discussion and deem them not fit for any kind of argument.

If, for example, you've ever struggled with what Romans 9 - 11 has to do with the rest of the letter, Wright's view makes these chapters not only fit within the flow of Paul's argument, but actually become the pinnacle and the climax of Romans.

I should think that this fits Bergson's view in spite of his ingenious argument that we can not foresee the future of an art tradition — an argument that applies to predicting even in some sketchy detail what artworks will be like in the future.

The error of the argument is that organisms evolve to fit the environment and not vice versa.

You can not age the fetus to fit your argument.

that's another reason the argument didn't fit.

I do not think nearly so well about our ill - fitting and much more expensive trio of Jackson, Griffin, and Drummond, and I really can not understand the argument that because Griffin is a better player than Harris, this trio will automatically be better than that which it proceeded.

No of course you won't because it doesn't fit your blinkered argument.

Overall, Bruce is not a perfect fit for the team going forward, and there is definitely an argument to be made that a center fielder like Lorenzo Cain would make far more sense than signing another corner outfielder.

Not just for their inhumanity and hate - mongering that seems inherent in their paradigm but because I doubt that their extreme bias can allow them to reason properly, to see the facts as they are, and not manipulate stats and arguments to fit their agendNot just for their inhumanity and hate - mongering that seems inherent in their paradigm but because I doubt that their extreme bias can allow them to reason properly, to see the facts as they are, and not manipulate stats and arguments to fit their agendnot manipulate stats and arguments to fit their agendas.

The recurring nature of the arguments we see in today's report prompts me to take a step back and ask what or who exactly is «not fit for purpose»?

He had either under - performed so badly that he was not fit for his office, their argument went: or, in fact, he had actually connived and plotted, along with his office, to help the Leave camp that he so obviously backed in private.

The above reference is to buttress my argument that the interpretation of constitution should be done in such a way that not only the laws fit together but also which of the overarching principles provide the glue to keep them together as I will attempt to do with the relevant sections of the 1992 Constitution.

Former Senate Leader Senate Ali Ndume on Thursday said even the Senate President, Bukola Saraki, is not fit to continue to lead the senate going by the argument of the Upper chamber in rejecting the nomination of the acting chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, Ibrahim Magu.

Legal experts note that judges» opinions in environmental cases won't necessarily fall strictly along ideological lines, but that conservative judges are often more likely to reject arguments calling for more regulation or trying to fit climate change rules within the existing Clean Air Act.

Yet the arguments still don't fit the reality.

To make his argument, Bordwell must, of course, ignore those aspects of the films he studies that do not fit the classical narrative structure, like the non-classical nature of a character such as Memento's Leonard Shelby (Guy Pearce).

I don't know how much I buy that argument, in particular I wonder how the HBO series Deadwood fits into the sceme.

Michael Mercieca, CEO of Young Enterprise said: «I welcome Sir Michael Wilshaw's argument that the «one size fits all» education system doesn't benefit all young people.

The argument I've heard public feedback about and which is part of the ruling, is that because Charter School boards of directors are appointed rather than elected, Charter Schools don't fit the definition of common schools, and are therefore somehow lacking in accountability.

Rotherham believes it is because «education reform doesn't fit well with the overall argument either candidate is making Read more about Why Aren't Obama and Romney Talking About Education?

I don't know what your position was in the past, but if this is your first call of injustice in KU, then it seems obvious that you're biased toward the welfare of shorter length work authors and are creating arguments to fit that mindset.

So you start with the author's argument [basic plot], touch on supporting evidence [characters and a major scene or two], what works or doesn't [ditto], and how it fits in the literature [what other books it resembles or contrasts with].

As John Hussman noted last week, the «Don't fight the Fed» argument doesn't fit the data once investor preferences have shifted to risk aversion (based on market internals, credit spreads, and other risk - sensitive measures).

You probably remember one of the defining moments of the O.J. Simpson trial, when during closing arguments, in reference to the infamous glove found at the scene, Johnnie Cochran said, «If it doesn't fit, you must acquit.»

On the other hand, the pilot study fits more neatly into the argument put forward by Longcore et al. — an argument that doesn't even recognize the distinction between compensatory and additive predation.

I did have a rebuttal, but either side of the argument really simply just boils down to «I do think it fits because robots etc.» or «I don't think it fits because fuel engine sounds etc.».

In principle, these works might not seem to fit within the argument of the present exhibition but Gonzales's intention here is to create a different optical effect and a unique visual experience.

It would therefore be more fitting to approach this show not as an argument between formal or gendered dichotomies, but as a glimpse into explorations of Minimalist abstraction that remain largely outside the received narratives of the period.»

And we have Curry's own circular argument, climate models are not fit for purpose because Big Natual Oscillation is not addressed by the climate models.

However when the use of the curve fit is intended for future projections, and this fit is then used to support an argument for current and future acceleration, then not presenting the best measurement we have which does not support an argument for acceleration is misleading in my opinion.

My comment was not about M&M as individuals but really about how the hockey stick controversy and M&M's arguments fit into the bigger picture of the climate change debate.

He also tried to say in comments this was Hoffman's fit not his but I'm not going to restart detailed arguments at this stage.

The argument is that if you fit a trend line from 1975 to the start of 1997 (or the middle of 1997, the exact time not making much difference) then an extension of that trendline to the present shows that the data since then has not deviated in any significant way from that trendline.

However, when you take a close look at arguments expressing climate «skepticism», what you often observe is cherry picking of pieces of evidence while rejecting any data that don't fit the desired picture.

The IPCC attribution arguments (as opposed a rigorous scientific treatment of the question) operate under several constraints: the need to fit concerns for positive feedbacks, the need to not accidentally produce a very low value for sensitivity, the obligation to accommodate, and at times, exploit such unknowns as aerosols (very useful but also a pain), and so forth.

One can not pick the timeframes to fit the argument.

Even if one accepts (for the sake of argument) the preposterous claim that Corcoran did not know that Harris and his NRSP were really behind the letter, there remains the inconvenient fact that Kelly and Corcoran did not see fit to correct the demonstrably misleading statement that the letter had been «organized» by Carter, once the true facts were presented.

If rational argument doesn't fit, then phony arguments must be invented: the spread of malaria, the loss of biological diversity, oceans flooding, polar bears disappearing, Himalayan glaciers vanishing, etc..

Yes Joshua, Lee is not constrained to fit his argument into a few paragraphs in a newspaper article or 30 seconds in front of a TV camera, which is the kind of situation Schneider was referring to.

Since there doesn't seem to be a way to directly incorporate accurate feedback effects into the IPCC models, how does feedback fit in the IPCC attribution argument?