Sentences with phrase «n't follow the letter»

From fines and penalties to tarnished brands and business failure, not following the letter of the law on every aspect of business hurts.
It is a disservice to hardworking charter teachers and administrators to allege charter schools are not following the letter of the law.
So it is a disservice to hardworking charter school teachers and administrators to allege that all charter schools are not following the letter of the law.
Using credit legislation, they determine whether negative listings in your report were put there by a credit provider that didn't follow the letter of the law.
If you don't follow the letter of the law (actually in the case of Security Deposits, it is the FONT of the law!)

Not exact matches

Traffic laws are there to keep you safe; they're not pettifoggery to be followed to the letter.
Nov. 6, 2016: Comey tells Congress in a follow - up letter that a review of newly discovered Clinton emails has «not changed our conclusions» that she should not face criminal charges.
The fact is, creating virtual havoc is just so much damn fun and a game where the character follows the rules to the letter of the law just wouldn't be all that enjoyable.
In the letter, the group argued that the act draws a «clear distinction» between those who should be licensed and those who should not, and will function as an «excellent model» for states to follow.
A No Action Letter is essentially the SEC enforcement division saying that if a company follows a certain guideline described in the letter that the SEC will not recommend action for violating securitiesLetter is essentially the SEC enforcement division saying that if a company follows a certain guideline described in the letter that the SEC will not recommend action for violating securitiesletter that the SEC will not recommend action for violating securities laws.
Unfortunately, the IRS does not allow a learning curve for first - time business owners — it still expects that all rules and regulations will be followed to the letter.
I don't mind voting for someone who knows how to follow both the letter and the spirit of the law and who actually does so.
Most scholars believe that the jubilee legislation was utopian and probably not followed to the letter.
I know there are other parts that are also not followed to the exact letter as well but I can't bring them all to mind at the moment.
He may not claim it of himself, but there are folks out there who can not imagine anyone being able to claim being a «true» Christian unless they follow the teachings of Billy Graham to the letter.
Dawn, when you read Matt 15 you find that Jesus is not saying to stone the children, he's reminding the Pharisees that they are inconsistent in their own attempts to follow the letter of the OT laws while criticizing others of for their inconsistency.
Why don't they start stoning people again if they think they must absolutely follow the letter of one law like that?
The Apostle Paul's warning in his first letter to the Corinthians, «God didn't send me out to collect a following for myself, but to preach the Message of what he has done, collecting a following for him.»
In what follows we shall go on to think of the Gospel in the Synoptic Gospels, in John, in Paul, in Peter, in James, in Hebrews, in the letters of John, in II Peter and in Jude, and in the Revelation; but it is of the first importance to remember that we are not dealing with a series of Gospels competing with one another for our allegiance.
In today's society a person who followed it to the letter would be locked up for assault, if not murder.
Uh, yo — idiot since you aren't following the bible to the letter if your satan did exist that's where you're going to be, lying is a major sin according to your rule book, but since you have a severe reading comprehension problems, we all get why you can't even seem to follow that you're your lies about me proves that one.
Anyone who has closely (and by closely I mean not just read articles when Driscoll catapults himself into Christian media) followed the events since 2007 and knows the dark underbelly of MHC knows that Mark Driscoll is a narcissist and that he is simply manipulating the bigger picture by sending this love letter to the people who are still drinking his kool - aid.
Just so you're aware, I ascribe to Bible as dictating morality, as much as one can given that one needs to read it with context and not blindly follow everything to the letter of the law.
Neither candidate follows the Bible to the letter as no person can because «none are perfect, no not one.»
Religion by its very nature claims to be the only correct view, and you will be punished if you do not follow it to the letter.
If God isn't that reasonable, well, I'll enjoy my time chilling with Nietzche, Buddha, some of my good friends, a few favorite professors, my therapist, my favorite aunt and uncle, Gandhi, some of our founding fathers, and all of those other folks who do not subscribe to Christianity or don't follow it to the letter.
If it came from ANY of the «letters to» then you're not following JESUS, you're following SAUL who was a GENTILE.
Preserving the author's integrity is not a bad guideline, if the spirit rather than the letter of the intent is followed.
To say that an individual that follows Rand's philosophies must follow it to the letter and not «pick and choose» from it or they are a hypocrite, means that you support 100 % taxation.
The apostles sent a letter to the Gentiles that included the following: «It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us not to burden you with anything beyond the following requirements: You are to abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals and from se - xual immorality.
Jesus Christ, is and it will be forever more the unique object lesson of living, the human being not ever, although we may be Christians we don't leave of to sin, for the very her writing she says Aerquémonos confiadamente at the throne of your handsomeness in order to reach forgiving in order to the perpetual help, in as much as not tenemos one God which not it can feel pity for of we, rather one which fué tempting all over, but without sin, according to the letter at the age of Hebrews, and the apostle John she says, whether various hubiere sin, solicitor tenemos in order to with the parent to Jesus Christ the that's right, not ever not any human being it will be the best object lesson not other than The Christ Jesus, nor Buddah bo Mahoma nor none, we don't follow to humanity rather at a God which fué tempting all over but without sin, not ever we owe put her scope in the humanity not other than in the.
Many claim today that only the intention of the Church's moral law has to be followed, not the letter of the law; but is not the intention of a lawgiver revealed by reading the law itself?
Apparently they are not following he 12 traditions to the letter while it is also obvious that the local AA service board is violating at least 4 traditions in taking the group off the list.
It is worthwhile to listen again to key passages of his letter to Canon J. Walker, which still retain much of their validity: «I do not fear the theory [of Darwin]... It does not seem to me to follow that creation is denied because the Creator, millions of years ago, gave laws to matter.
I have read and reread Ryan Amptmeyer's letter, but can't follow much of what he's trying to say.
I don't think it's a bad thing to not follow the bible to the letter (especially as a woman who doesn't want to be treated as second class).
First, there are numerous times in the book of Acts and in some of Paul's other letters where women appear to be speaking in the gatherings of the church with the approval of others, so whatever Paul is saying here, it does not seem to be a rule which he himself universally followed (Acts 16:14 - 15; Acts 18:26).
There also followed a once - famous falling - out after Richard, deploring the nativist strain, not to mention the flirtations with anti-Semitism, that was peeking out in some Rockford Institute publications, filed one blistering letter too many to the head of that organization.
kosher can not save you, following the letter of the law can not save you.
The early Christians thought that the entire bible OT and NT was meant to be followed to the letter.
Not long after Spalatin's return from Cologne, he received a letter from Luther about another kind of book burning: «On 10 December 1520, at nine o'clock in the morning, all the following papal books were burned in Wittenberg at the eastern gate near the Church of the Holy Cross: the Decretum, the Decretals,... and the most recent Bull of Leo X; likewise the Summa Angelica, Eck's Chrysopassus... This was done so that the incendiary papists may see that it doesn't take much to burn books they can not refuNot long after Spalatin's return from Cologne, he received a letter from Luther about another kind of book burning: «On 10 December 1520, at nine o'clock in the morning, all the following papal books were burned in Wittenberg at the eastern gate near the Church of the Holy Cross: the Decretum, the Decretals,... and the most recent Bull of Leo X; likewise the Summa Angelica, Eck's Chrysopassus... This was done so that the incendiary papists may see that it doesn't take much to burn books they can not refunot refute.
Either you follow the book of fairy tales to the letter or you DO N'T!
I was in a literal, dogmatic church bible-wise, and I believed it, felt beholden to it, felt guilty whenever I couldn't follow it to the letter, tried to * really * understand it.
We don't do these things simply because Christ told us to, and we're going to follow the letter of the law.
Also did Jesus not get upset with the Pharcies for following the letter of the book to closely and not the spirit of it.
Do we not say the police need to follow the spirit of the law rather than the letter of the law.
The critical passage in Darwin's letter to Asa Gray is the following: «I can not think that the world... is the result of chance; and yet I can not look at each separate thing as the result of Design... I am, and shall ever remain, in a hopeless muddle» (Darwin F. 1888 Vol.
However, in spring 2005, when Raymond Bradley, an atheist in Editorial Board for The Open Society journal, wrote an open letter to Flew accusing him of not «check [ing] the veracity of [Schroeder's] claims before swallowing them whole,» Flew strongly responded to that charge in a letter published in the same journal in summer 2006, describing the content of Bradley's letter «extraordinary offensive» and the accusation made by him as an «egregiously offensive charge»; he also implied that Bradley was a «secularist bigot,» and suggested that he should follow Socrates's advice (as scripted in Plato's Republic) of «follow [ing] the argument wherever it leads.»
Not sure where i went wrong, followed recipie to the letter and have had to leave it for a good hour and a half and it still was like bread and butter puding, it just wouldnt set to a cutable like texture.
Although I don't follow any one plan to the letter (I still eat meat for instance), your ideas have been the easiest to incorporate into my life.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z