Sentences with phrase «n't get a better value for your money»

You can't get a better value for your money.

But when the emphasis is on quantity, and the quality of the content suffers as a result, you're not getting good value for your money.

Indigenous Australians are not getting good value for money.

Not exact matches

I don't consider myself frugal, I just make sure I get value for money on what I want, I don't buy crap and get the best deal I can on fixed expenses.

He said the «peanut butter approach» of spreading marketing investment into all of the company's brands was not working with Treasury Wine's getting better value for money by supporting its key premium brands and some bottom end commercial wines that are popular with consumers.

If fans will not boycott the games and stop paying for the tickets then let us at least unite and tell Silent Stan that the CEO is not making him the money that he could, if Silent Stan starts to see Gazidis as a loss to profit then maybe we can get an ambitious CEO in who will help us be ambitious and win titles, use that then to get better business done and add to the value of the clubs assets (players), remove the lowest value players (not good enough for AFC) and replace them with high value assets which will increase in value when we are winning / truly competing at the highest level.

To name a few additional struggles: we have to compete with the richest league in the world where every team has money and isn't begging for transfers of their best players to fund themselves (8/20 of the highest valued teams), we have a poor injury record that is being addressed, we have far fewer homegrown talents in our league, the overall league quality is higher even if the highest teams are not of the quality of other top teams, selling of our best players during the past decade has lead to a lack of momentum and yes, there has been times where our manager got it wrong.

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

at every home game please donate a pound or better throw it in Wengers direction he may get 50 to 60 k pounds every home match as they are already looting the fans there.sit on the money and wait for market value to come down wenger.players are there he just does not wan na pay.But we are a small club, wenger is actually proving the likes of fabregas, nasri and van persie that they were right to leave the club cuz all players have ambition to win the league

we can't even get rid of players that have barely mannered to us for several years... which is incredibly annoying considering that our beloved owner would never risk his own financial resources whether he brought in some new blood or offloaded several failed Wenger projects for less than market value... he would simply make a little less and the burden would fall squarely on other sources of income, primarily us... I don't know about you but I would gladly use all the money they have been stockpiling to rid ourselves of those that don't meet acceptable standards and to replace them with a few higher priced gems... I know, I know, Wenger and his minions have been scouring the globe for years now to find anyone that was as good as our current lot to no avail, but I've just got to believe there must be two or three guys somewhere out there that can play this crazy game

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

It presents strollers which you should look out for not just to get value for your money, but also to serve you well for a long time.

A good soap ensures that you always get value for your money because you do not have to use a lot when washing.

We call on government to undertake a full - scale review of the existing Power Purchase Agreements to ensure that (1) Ghana gets good value for money and (2) Ghanaians are not overburdened by excessive tariff increases due to errors committed by politicians who might have served their own interests with such agreements.

I have learned so much about making public bodies work better, and getting good value for money, it would be crazy not to build on it.»

«Now that an increasing number of PFI deals are in their operational stage, and change will inevitably be needed over time, the public sector has to raise its game to get a better outcome and use the guidance and resources available, particularly as changes made to operational projects have not always provided value for money.»

M: Overall, there are major differences in performance in relation to money spent, and the correlation tends to be that the best performers are countries which, in effect, make sure that young people are set free to pursue their own agenda and express their creativity, and that systems that entrench the young too long in training or in hierarchical structures of apprenticeship and deference to their elders don't get the same value for their money.

And it's free, so as far as value for the money, it doesn't get much better, right?

The price of a membership isn't the cheapest around, but does offer good value for money when you take into account all that you are getting for your money.

Our director of programmes and partnerships, David Edwards, puts it like this: «At an average of around # 1.93, school meals are still good value for money — there aren't many places on the high street where you can get a nutritious, two - course meal for that price.

Since 2008 doing approx 1000 miles per year, I put it through an mot on the 10th January, it passed without advisories;; The underneath is very solid indeed and doesn't need any work, the current paint was done approx 7 years ago to a good standard but is not perfect, when it had a change from Albert Blue (traces of it around the battery boxes) to the current black;; It still has the US import sticker on the left side door post, the original chassis plate and the chassis stamp on the bulkhead are all there;; It drives very well, I've driven it for circa 40 miles with no problems;; It has 15» Fuchs alloys and the spare is a chrome steel wheel;; The rear end has been «modernised» at some point, I personally would remove the rear Porsche reflector and fit an original panel and bumper stops to get it back to the original pre impact bumper look, I could do this for you if required, cost circa GBP 800;; The seats have been changed to 80's leather recaros and the door cards to a later style, again I'd put some period seats in and back date the door cards if required at cost price;; The 80's recaros are worth good money so shouldn't be too much further expense if they were sold separately;; Further information to come but please contact me if you have any queries;; In summary, a really good looking classic 911Targa, that is great value and can be enjoyed as is, or improved for not a lot of money;;

Overview Fully electric car is surprisingly refined and is pretty easy to live with Pros It uses absolutely no gas (zero emissions), refined operation, cheerful personality, government rebates make Leaf more affordable, and in many cities, you get preferred parking spots and access to HOV lanes Cons Lack of charging infrastructure (not a huge issue if you have a short commute) Value for money Good (especially with government incentives) What would I change?

If u r confused between Creta / Brezza / TUV300 / Nexon / Jeep compass then Trust me guys go for Ford EcoSports coz it's VALUE FOR MONEY n you get all the best features in this car - EBD, TCS, Hill control assist, rain sensing vipers n many more within your budgfor Ford EcoSports coz it's VALUE FOR MONEY n you get all the best features in this car - EBD, TCS, Hill control assist, rain sensing vipers n many more within your budgFOR MONEY n you get all the best features in this car - EBD, TCS, Hill control assist, rain sensing vipers n many more within your budget.

$ 780 buys you a Core i3, 64 GB, digitizer - capable tablet but if you don't need the pen - layer you might not be getting best value for your money.

But because I'm such a stickler for giving you the best value for your money, I spoke with others in the business, too — top book publicists and industry insiders who know what works and what doesn't — to make sure what I've got in this priceless workbook is as good as it can be.

The best way to stay up on the newest things going on is to give your information away for free, and then get feedback from other people about what's working and what's not working, and then I make all my money on the extreme margins with the high - value authors, who don't want to worry about marketing, they'll just pay me.

While you don't get the lightest, thinnest or highest specs in the Fire HD 10, this is undoubtedly good value for money, with a price that's hard to ignore.

People want devices that make them feel they got good value for money OR that they got the chance to show they have disposable income OR that they are most certainly not willing to waste money on expensive things.

If you're feeling pressured to make an immediate offer but haven't taken the time to become familiar with the local market, you won't know if you're getting good value for your money.

; Reckless Bets; Risk Adjusted Returns; Keep an Eye on Your Objective; Remember ElLobo's Trick; Why Dividends Are Better; The Candyland Hypothesis; Equal Weighting versus Capitalization Weighting; Money on the Sidelines; Mental Exercise; Dangerous Market; Characterizing ADVDX; Adjustments for Taxes; Income Streams; Not Simply Total Return; Something Subtle; Don't Get Caught; Intrinsic Value; Primitive Monte Carlo Simulations.

I used my «Income Tax Refund» to get my 1 month of expenses together... so I have in - creased the value of my Income Tax Refund to about 1 and 1/2 times the amount that I received from the Federal Government and my State... Not a bad deal... getting to use my Income Tax Refund and making it work for me instead of me just going out and acting careless... I also use any over time that I might get towards my bills... ie; «Snow - Flaking»... sure does feel good... I am tak - ing back «My» money and learn how to be a good steward of it... I have learn of «My» problem with «My» income... ie; I had a «Love Hate» relationship with my income!!

Booking with us will get you the best deals and most value for money so don't hesitate to call us.

You certainly got good value for money for a 2 hr 20 minute flight, didn't you!

Their customer service is fantastic; their website is user - friendly; their insurance policy is easier to understand than any other policies that I have read and it doesn't have so much incomprehensible legal jargon; their prices are very reasonable and provide the best value for your money for the coverage that you get (they were the cheapest that I could find during my research); and it is easy to make a claim on their website, purchase insurance and extend your coverage while you are still on the road.

Like always the actual price of this product won't affect the score the end of this review too much, for two very distinct reasons: the first is that I get many of the games and products that I review on this site for free, and this I am not the best person to be judging value as I did not spend money on it, and second because I firmly believe that what I view as a good value for money may not be what you view as good value for money.

Usually when I write a review I'll just add the value for money in the score bar at the bottom and not mention much about it other than in a summary, this games pricing has been set up differently to what we usually see, for example you can buy the full game for about # 30 OR if you're an online multiplayer fanatic and only want to play that part of the game you can buy the Multiplayer version for # 20, now if you've bought the multiplayer and fancy expanding to the full game it will cost you # 15 for the single player being # 5 over the original price, most will think that this is fair, you can get the multiplayer element cheaper and test it out, if you like it you can then grab the campaign, well, this is where it gets dark.

You my friend... would be so wrong lol as much as I believe certain things shouldn't cost to get in game such as season passes for Naruto I will shut my mouth and throw my money at them because to me it is worth it as I find $ 30 to be a good value for what I will get out of this game such as I do in Fallout 4 because I believe what I am getting out of the experience is much more than going out to eat or the like but thats just me

The game is good value for money, as the game doesn't get repetitive and can be played over and over again to try for a new high score.

The best price doesn't always mean that you're going to get the best value for your money.

Being insured with us doesn't just mean getting good coverage and quality service, it also means getting the most value for your money!

Nevertheless, getting custom and special travel insurance policies may not be the most cost - effective option, because they do not provide the best value for your money.

The thing about having the cheapest car insurance is that you might not always be getting the best value for your money.

The best, in this case, does not mean paying the least amount for coverage; it means getting the most benefits that gives you best value for your money based on the actual condition of your car and your current circumstance.

However, keep in mind that although saving money is a good thing to keep in mind when looking for a car insurance, make sure also that quality of the package you are getting is not bended and is still of best value.

And on paper, you get a lot of value for your money: a 1080p IPS touchscreen that was brighter and had more vibrant colors than anything else we tested, decent 6 - hour battery life, plenty of ports (including Thunderbolt 3), a fingerprint reader and a Windows Hello IR webcam, a keyboard and trackpad that aren't as good as Lenovo's but still aren't bad, and a three - year warranty.

Hiring letter writing companies that offer a low fee may not exactly bring results but when you opt for our service, we guarantee that you'll get the best value for your money and more.

I think the timing of this ad isn't great — the money in this could have been better spent researching how realtors get more money for the home owners than when they sell FSBO; or showing the value added we do in the real world.

the rationalization that as long as realtor X makes more sales the better the sales person they are leads to how can I streamline my business to make more money out of each client with as little time and money invested leads to less service per client... Reinvesting commission \ profits into personal promotion so eventually the informed client will feel they are not getting value for they money they are paying in commission.

David: So the point here is you really only need to get one really good deal and that should provide you money for your next deal, which would provide you money for your next deal and as long as you're buying right every time and adding value to your properties, you'll only struggle with not having money for your very first deal, okay?