Sentences with phrase «n't get something for nothing»

You don't get something for nothing.

Also, in bartering, you really don't get something for nothing.

When are environmentalists going to realize that you can't get something for nothing.

Another version is: You can't get something for nothing.

They understand that you can't get something for nothing in the energy world.

Who says you can't get something for nothing?

You can't get something for nothing.

In economics, one of my firmest beliefs is that you can't get something for nothing.

An honest man knows that you can't get something for nothing.

Anyone who is mature enough to be a board member in the county had better be worldly wise enough to know that you can't get something for nothing, and that advisors may have ulterior motives.

Remember, you can't get something for nothing — not even governments.

I'm a skeptic on all of these, because you can't get something for nothing.

I am a firm believer in «you can't get something for nothing.»

Who says you can't get something for nothing?

Can't get something for nothing.

You can't get something for nothing and the frontline is where we see the price of education austerity — in workload, teaching quality and teacher retention.

Sorry, but you can't get something for nothing.

Eliminate their use when possible, substitute their use with natural sweeteners, however, being mindful natural sweeteners also have their issues; «You don't get something for nothing!»

CK: We're so used to thinking that you can't get something for nothing.

«You don't get something for nothing.»

So it means, in other words, that «you can't get something for nothing.»

When it comes to free money, or free tokens in this case, you still really can't get something for nothing, BUT you can get something for VERY little and this is where crypto airdrops come in.

«Don't be too proud to apply for unemployment; you're not getting something for nothing,» explains Certified Financial Planner Gary Silverman, founder of Personal Money Planning in Wichita Falls, Texas.

Not exact matches

[01:10] Introduction [02:45] James welcomes Tony to the podcast [03:35] Tony's leap year birthday [04:15] Unshakeable delivers the specific facts you need to know [04:45] What James learned from Unshakeable [05:25] Most people panic when the stock market drops [05:45] Getting rid of your fear of investing [06:15] Last January was the worst opening, but it was a correction [06:45] You are losing money when you sell on corrections [06:55] Bear markets come every 5 years on average [07:10] The greatest opportunity for a millennial [07:40] Waiting for corrections to invest [08:05] Warren Buffet's advice for investors [08:55] If you miss the top 10 trading days a year... [09:25] Three different investor scenarios over a 20 year period [10:40] The best trading days come after the worst [11:45] Investing in the current world [12:05] What Clinton and Bush think of the current situation [12:45] The office is far bigger than the occupant [13:35] Information helps reduce fear [14:25] James's story of the billionaire upset over another's wealth [14:45] What money really is [15:05] The story of Adolphe Merkle [16:05] The story of Chuck Feeney [16:55] The importance of the right mindset [17:15] What fuels Tony [19:15] Find something you care about more than yourself [20:25] Make your mission to surround yourself with the right people [21:25] Suffering made Tony hungry for more [23:25] By feeding his mind, Tony found strength [24:15] Great ideas don't interrupt you, you have to pursue them [25:05] Never - ending hunger is what matters [25:25] Richard Branson is the epitome of hunger and drive [25:40] Hunger is the common denominator [26:30] What you can do starting right now [26:55] Success leaves clues [28:10] What it means to take massive action [28:30] Taking action commits you to following through [29:40] If you do nothing you'll learn nothing [30:20] There must be an emotional purpose behind what you're doing [30:40] How does Tony ignite creativity in his own life [32:00] «How is not as important as «why» [32:40] What and why unleash the psyche [33:25] Breaking the habit of focusing on «how» [35:50] Deep Practice [35:10] Your desired outcome will determine your action [36:00] The difference between «what» and «why» [37:00] Learning how to chunk and group [37:40] Don't mistake movement for achievement [38:30] Tony doesn't negotiate with his mind [39:30] Change your thoughts and change your biochemistry [40:00] The bad habit of being stressed [40:40] Beautiful and suffering states [41:50] The most important decision is to live in a beautiful state no matter what [42:40] Consciously decide to take yourself out of suffering [43:40] Focus on appreciation, joy and love [44:30] Step out of suffering and find the solution [45:00] Dealing with mercury poisoning [45:40] Tony's process for stepping out of suffering [46:10] Stop identifying with thoughts — they aren't yours [47:40] Trade your expectations for appreciation [50:00] The key to life — gratitude [51:40] What is freedom for you?

Nothing gets in the way of a Christian and his / her faith, not even logic, and something most Christians do is confuse faith for fact.

with faith in God nothing can ever destroy you, no matter what happens to you on this earth, he will never let you go through something that you can not handle, I personally have prayed for help in many situations and not got the results i immediatly asked for, but was blessed in ways that worked out better for me in the long run.

There is no thought of resort to dishonest means to escape effort, no subterfuge, and no bypassing aimed at getting something for nothing, since the whole motive for work is not getting but giving, making, serving, creating.

For those that argue that you can not get something from nothing I urge you to google the video «A Universe from Nothing» by Lawrence nothing I urge you to google the video «A Universe from Nothing» by Lawrence Nothing» by Lawrence Krauss.

Maybe she's right, and Americans — particularly millennials — are developing stronger senses of entitlement, but the idea that «you can get something for nothing» becoming more prevalent, isn't necessarily a bad thing when it comes to faith.

I know crazy but its something to think about since there is no ultimate explanation as to why we even exist, even if you take science to its root there is no explanation for why anything actually exists at all, after all you can't get something from nothing so I had rather have something than nothing.

I suggest you truly educate yourself and go look for that proof like I did, Then you will realize the only supposed proof is from the Catholics and the Bible and NOTHING exists otherwise, unless you are referring to the proof that there were over 30 idiots roaming the desert during this time claiming to be the Christ which is something that always happens when the ignorant Jews get conquered which happens on a regular basis because they are just too stupid to even defend themselves, someone else always has to do it for them and trust me it sure the hell isn't God LMFAO

We are all struggling... to explain how we get the fantastic order and complexity of the universe out something very simple... Krauss calls the substrate of his explanation «nothing»... whatever it is, it is very, very simple and therefore is a worthy premise for an explanation, whereas a God, a creative Intelligence, is not a worthy substrate for an explanation because it is already something very complicated...»

For Suarez this would be to get something from nothing — if you start with two substantial forms and join them together, you have two substantial forms joined together, not two, plus a third one arising from their union.

By the way is only one digning enough?Have u ever thought about it?The problems in the team are plain and honestly one signing is not enough but hey we will take something over nothing shant we.I really love Arsene Wenger he has not really been able to handle the pressure in Arsenal for dome years now.He keeps making wrong decisions season by season.So if i was him i would go all out and get the job done now!!!

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I am seriously hoping that once again they have not got the fans hope up for nothing and if history tells us something, we are set for a disapointment.

Holding did ok but Chambers was very cocky how many miss passes in dangerous areas did he miss place why didn't he booted the ball way down the field and take the pressure off at the first half the commentator spook of the inexperience of the defense and that liverpool did nt put enough pressure klopp rectified that straight away bang bang bang with runners and no protection while wenger face went all red with nothing to say the only thing that saved us really was the injuries for the game to take a change MR wenger is far to slow to fix things what is wrong with him he most not be in good health or something personnel worrying him cause after all he is the manager his got to have a fast thinking brain smell danger and act fast not seat and debate the issue with bold

Good win yesterday... need something to give us a bit of confidence... But lets not get ahead of ourselves yet we need to get a good run going... with Ramsey out Wenger has no excuse not to play Campbell who put in another great performance all over the field and his assist for Walcott's first was nothing short of Ozil like!

Great going forward but defensively we were fragile AGAIN.Mustafi - what on God's earth was he thinking about with that clearance that resulted in the free kick for their goal?He is proving himself a liability and Kos wasn't exactly dominant either.That game could have ended 12 - 5 or something ridiculous like that.Still we have enough to get through and we would have taken that score line before the game.Ozil was majestic out there last night and Ramsey did what he does best.But Wilshere was very poor and you wonder now if the writing is on the wall for him.He continually lost the ball and offered nothing going forward.

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

i would love nothing more than we get a forward thinking manager in at the end of season pep klopp etc or however can take us to the next level, i just realistically accept the present problem at the moment and just hope we can maneuver our way around it until end of season, i want nothing more than that we not just compete but run the league for years to come and am fully aware this may or may not happen under wenger as long as we win something big and take our place among the big 4 European clubs with a manager that wants to make a name for himself with us.

If the team lacks something, they will go all out and spend neccessary big money on filling the voids, Wenger just doesn't do that and never will, every season after a transfer window we say, «Oh if only we brought this player in that position or that player in this position, oh well maybe Wenger will do it next summer» but Wenger just always leaves a weakness that just never gets filled, he could have got Khedira, made a bid for Vidal or Carvalho, but no... Instead he puts his faith in a 32 - 33 year old slow Spaniard who only knows how to pass and nothing else and a 30 year old Frenchman named Flamini who only knows how to foul.

while i can definitely get behind curbing consumption every day, (which, like you said is the point), i read something recently that made me rethink buy nothing day: http://www.sojo.net/blog/godspolitics/?p=4014 it argues that buy nothing day is a day for priviledged white people to assuage their guilt about their own over-consumption while simultaneously looking down on lower - income people who may not be able to afford to pass up those black friday doorbusters.

Many lower middle class voters believe that they work hard and don't take welfare - or are refused it - while others get something for nothing.

But no, we will not do that by returning to the something for nothing economics that got us into this mess.

We're not saying to people, vote for us, and somehow you can get something for nothing, that doesn't work.

When I first got hypothyroidism, I didn't have a choice but to either eat nothing or eat something that has little to no calcium and iron for the first four hours of the day, after taking my medicine.

When your biggest problem is that the cast is so uniformly terrific that the greatest complaint you have is some don't get enough screen time, you know you have something quite special, and, having sat with the film for several months now, it feels like nothing less than «The Godfather» of espionage movies.

About MP10 he said: «Don't get too hype for it» I doubt that after almost 7 months of nothing about it, Nintendo would just show a cra ** y trailer that does not rise the hype for the game nor shows something so boring to the point of being forgotten like this guy said.

The site may be nothing to look at, but it's not hard to find what you are looking for and it's really use to get drawn into something interesting you hadn't intended to read.