In my mind the sign of a great entrepreneur is the one that spots the 30 % scenario quickly and adjusts but doesn't get gun shy about rapid decision - making in the future.
Maybe if they could
not get guns as easily there would be fewer shootings.
«Every amendment has reasonable limitations and it seems the most reasonable of all is to say a terrorist shouldn't get a gun, would - be terrorist,» he said.
«Let the Democrats say, «I'm going to shut down the government if we don't get a gun control law.»
They didn't get the guns, but they tried.
1:14 - This shot shows Morgan and what appears to be Bill Williamson on the left, I don't know who the guy in the middle is but judging by the fact that he hasn't got a gun, is dressed in fine clothes with a pocket watch and is walking in front of the Morgan and Williamson he may be getting taken hostage.
Sounds simple enough but these few seconds when you can't shift leave you very vulnerable, especially as you've
not got a gun.
Not exact matches
But, he told studio chiefs: «When it comes to issues like
gun violence, we've
got to make sure that we're
not glorifying it, because the stories you tell shape our children's outlook and their lives.»
«If you looked around this closet and saw everyone just hiding together, you would know that this shouldn't be happening anymore, and that it doesn't deserve to happen to anyone, and that no amount of money should make it more easily accessible to
get guns,» she said.
Activists seeing divestment in the
gun industry
get a sympathetic ear, but in practice, it hasn't been so easy for Wall Street to
get out.
Sped - up development cycles also create tensions between developers who are under the
gun to ship, and the information security professionals who will
get the blame for security problems despite
not having enough time to do a proper evaluation.
It's essentially the nations largest
get together for
gun owners and they won't let law abiding legal
gun owners carry
guns because someone who's supposedly pro 2A thinks its too «dangerous»?
As I watched, I heard references to people on roofs, people
getting into attics, people wandering around on overpasses, people
not being allowed to have
guns in the Convention Center, which was going to be used as a shelter.
Parkland
gun control activist David Hogg does
not appear bothered by being rejected by colleges, claiming that «amazing people don't
get into college.»
«Mr. Obama is the best
gun salesman on the planet,» the chairman of Navellier Associates told CNBC's «Squawk Box,» adding that he has
not gotten any pushback from investors concerned about profiting from
gun stocks.
But America can't
get to those solutions until it admits it has a
gun problem and confronts the reality of what it would mean to seriously address it.
And unless your plans include moving to another country — almost any other country, really — you are
not going to
get any relief from the pain of living in a nation that values
guns over people.
«If the Facebook ads just riled up people on
guns but did
not mention Trump for example, but were intended to help Trump
get elected, can those be illegal?
It's
not so easy to
get away from
guns — how about in the theater in Aurora?
If they can't
get over that, they should
not have
guns!
I don't want the gov» t to come into my home checking that I'm being a responsible adult... In New Hampshire, where I live, there are few
gun laws... one of them is you can store and keep a firearm however you want... but if a child
gets a hold of it, whatever happens is on you the owner of the firearm.
I'll accept «
guns don't kill people...» only if idiotic carelessness, eg, in leaving a loaded
gun out where children can
get at it, is added to the ways in which people kill people.
Only by reducing the love affair Americans have with
guns can we start to reduce the macho
gun owner mentality (and I know many
gun owners... most are hunters, and I have no issue with that, but no deer was ever so formidable that anyone ever needed an assault rifle to take it down (and I've caught wild turkey with nothing but snare traps) People
get up in arms caliming their rights are violated when some law limits
guns, but that does
not remove the right to bear arms, simply limits it to reason within the spirit of the amendment.
There's a small chance the next nutter won't be able to
get a really big mag and it will be a compromise between the pro and anti
gun types.
You just
got the sense it wasn't all out «go
guns» and spouted the talking points.
But being in a suburb of Dallas, I thought that the neighbors wouldn't appreciate me shooting a
gun next door, and so went down to Home Depot to
get some poison.
Taking everyones
guns won't stop people
getting them...
Is there an aid group or something out there that can help these people to
get away from their insane neighbors who want to kill them (freely admitting that the majority of iraqi muslims are
not murderers... that much said, it only takes one crazy person with a
gun and a full ammo clip to wipe out a family)... somebody do something...
Got your guns, got your truck, got your country music and your Chik Fil a. Don't mess with Iceman, cause he is tou
Got your
guns,
got your truck, got your country music and your Chik Fil a. Don't mess with Iceman, cause he is tou
got your truck,
got your country music and your Chik Fil a. Don't mess with Iceman, cause he is tou
got your country music and your Chik Fil a. Don't mess with Iceman, cause he is tough.
And I have seen you post before against assault rifles and for more
gun control, unless I
got posters confused, which I don't think I did.
Romneys grandpa was Ran out of the USA to Mexico for having 12 wives and some as young as 11 years old, and being a Mormon cultist polygamist.When Romneys grandpa
got to mexico he was
gunned down by a jealous husband of one of his wives... Yeah these are the cult values we do
nt want in the whitehoiuse.Romney believes in the same things as his grandpa... what sickos
If that were
not the case, police would
not carry
guns because they would have a better chance of
not getting shot.
That being said, perhaps if we did a better job of spending our taxes on effective education for our kids, effective welfare that does
not encourage dependence, and improvement of the infrastructure of our country, we would see a decrease in people
getting their hands on
guns and killing others.
So the kid has a
gun illegaly, which again a kid can
not posses a
gun legally... tell me again, what law will keep a kid from
getting a
gun?
The Aurora, CO shooter tried to
get a membership to a
gun range in Denver and was refused by the range master because he felt something was just
not right about the guys mental state.
Kids can't legally own a
gun now but they still
get them.
nakedpastor September 4, 2011 7:53 pm hey fishon and sam: if you are bothered by the things i say and don't like my store, no one has
got a
gun to your head making you visit this site.
Guns are in schools because quite obviously kids are able to
get them with relative ease,
not because the govt took forced prayer out of public schools.
«In my world, you don't
get to call yourself «pro-life» and be against common - sense
gun control — like banning public access to the kind of semiautomatic assault rifle, designed for warfare, that was used recently in a Colorado theater.
Essentially he's saying «I'm sorry for the victims and want to help the families
get through this... but I still don't support
gun laws that could prevent certain people from doing the same thing to other families.»
It doesn't matter if Illinois has tough
gun laws if people can just
get guns from other states with lax
gun laws.
If he's going to arrive as a thief in the night, he'd better
not do it in Texas (or Florida, or Wyoming, Arizona, etc.), or else he may
get himself shot... And then people would have to walk around with little replica
guns on their neck chains...
Someone can
get you to say that 1 + 1 = 3 by holding a
gun to your head, or some other hell - like threat, but it wouldn't actually make that math true, right?
If they don't
get killed bytheir own
guns or their
guns don't kill their young, they will die out soon, but
not soon enough for those who don't own
gun.
Chris, so defending your life, fighting for your freedom of religion, speech and
guns, that was wrong because he didn't believe in your flavor of god???? So, he should just let you
get taken by the Taliban because he doesn't know right from wrong, being that he is non christian... good to know.
It simply isn't going to happen... and in the meantime, one of their retarded kids
gets it in his head that because Mandy dumped him and Brock teased him at school, is gonna take one of Daddy's
guns and blow the fvck out of a bunch of little kids before offing himself.
If
guns are bad, aren't a good deterrent to crime, and can
get the owner shot (which, if you discount suicides, barely registers as a single percentage of
gun injuries), why then do police and the military have them?
Guns are very effective deterrents, and given that 99.9996 % of gun owners don't go out and kill anyone with guns (that's, 35000 murders (assuming one murder per gun owner, which is a generous number, divided by 100m gun owners, which own about 270m guns in the US), it's mind numbingly stupid to argue that GUNS are the problem, or that even legal gun owners are the problem, when you're more likely to get run over by a car (and 13 times more likely to just die of canc
Guns are very effective deterrents, and given that 99.9996 % of gun owners don't go out and kill anyone with guns (that's, 35000 murders (assuming one murder per gun owner, which is a generous number, divided by 100m gun owners, which own about 270m guns in the US), it's mind numbingly stupid to argue that GUNS are the problem, or that even legal gun owners are the problem, when you're more likely to get run over by a car (and 13 times more likely to just die of canc
Guns are very effective deterrents, and given that 99.9996 % of
gun owners don't go out and kill anyone with
guns (that's, 35000 murders (assuming one murder per gun owner, which is a generous number, divided by 100m gun owners, which own about 270m guns in the US), it's mind numbingly stupid to argue that GUNS are the problem, or that even legal gun owners are the problem, when you're more likely to get run over by a car (and 13 times more likely to just die of canc
guns (that's, 35000 murders (assuming one murder per gun owner, which is a generous number, divided by 100m gun owners, which own about 270m guns in the US), it's mind numbingly stupid to argue that GUNS are the problem, or that even legal gun owners are the problem, when you're more likely to get run over by a car (and 13 times more likely to just die of canc
guns (that's, 35000 murders (assuming one murder per
gun owner, which is a generous number, divided by 100m
gun owners, which own about 270m
guns in the US), it's mind numbingly stupid to argue that GUNS are the problem, or that even legal gun owners are the problem, when you're more likely to get run over by a car (and 13 times more likely to just die of canc
guns in the US), it's mind numbingly stupid to argue that GUNS are the problem, or that even legal gun owners are the problem, when you're more likely to get run over by a car (and 13 times more likely to just die of canc
guns in the US), it's mind numbingly stupid to argue that
GUNS are the problem, or that even legal gun owners are the problem, when you're more likely to get run over by a car (and 13 times more likely to just die of canc
GUNS are the problem, or that even legal gun owners are the problem, when you're more likely to get run over by a car (and 13 times more likely to just die of canc
GUNS are the problem, or that even legal
gun owners are the problem, when you're more likely to
get run over by a car (and 13 times more likely to just die of cancer).
One of the pieces of legislation that seems like a no - brainer is sometimes called the «One Handgun a Month» law, which would
not get in the way of the Second Amendment right to bear arms but simply says maybe 12
guns a year are enough.
That's like saying if we
get rid of
guns then folks will
not kill each other.