Sentences with phrase «n't get you published»

Five - time bestselling author, Jeff Goins, says «The hardest part about writing a book isn't getting published.

Simply seeking truth won't get you published, tenured, or paid, so she's making outlandish, meritless claims, that get her face on CNN, that get people so riled up, that hopefully, one or two of them will buy her books.

Such stories don't get published or produced because consumers don't like them.

(But unless you're a well - known author, you probably couldn't get it published!)

Just look at today — unless you support evolution you don't get published in the «respectable» journals.

The latter, thoroughly censored by Luther both as to his sermons and his books which he could not get published, had relinquished his office of Dean of the Faculty of Theology but continued to be a lecturer in receipt of a salary from the University.

I used to think that my first novel not getting published would kill me (it didn't).

Those figures don't get published as much as botched homebirths though.

In a 2003 email, Mann discusses encouraging colleagues to «no longer submit [papers] to, or cite papers in» Climate Research, after it published papers by known sceptics «that couldn't get published in a reputable journal».

You won't get it published anywhere decent.»

Such work doesn't get published and therefore can't shape evolving ideas in the field.

In fact, our letters were so weird that they almost didn't get published.

Or they finish and they can't get published.

The other day I received two angry emails from people who'd submitted to my site, but hadn't gotten published on it.

My last question did not get published.

Your personal details do not get published anywhere on the site.

But it's more important that your secretes not get publish other wise you never come back in your real social life because your reputation on social life and family is very bad.

If I can't get it published conventionally, then I'll self - publish.

Because we are writing the books we like to read, books that weren't getting published by most traditional publishers and those few who do put out similar books can't put out enough to feed our reading habit.

If you couldn't get published, then you «weren't good enough.»

* If you refuse to sell at that price, it doesn't get published.

It's open to a global market (really big in eastern Asia (Korea and China) where the enthusiasm started) and Radish can be used as a different source of income or to create buzz for an upcoming book that hasn't gotten published yet.

Basically, when you can't get a publishing deal with Hay House, they send you to Balboa, Simon and Schuster happily guides you to Archway, Thomas Nelson to WestBow, and Readers Digest to LifeRich, all white - labeled by Author Solutions.

This article from my Guide to Finding a Book Agent will reveal the only three reasons that talented authors don't get published.

The question now becomes why more books by women are not getting published.»

I read somewhere that most successful authors don't get published until they've written about 6 books.

But the idea that writing quality is the only reason people do or do not get published is yet another industry fraud, perpetrated for the express purpose of maintaining control.

I'm sorry your manuscript didn't get published in 2010; mine didn't either.

Clearly, not all books that «can't get published» are objectively inferior.

In some ways this is scary and upsetting, as we worry that good books will not get published and the art of writing and reading will disappear.

They were the first in the industry to offer 70 % royalties to authors on digital - only titles despite accusations that they were pandering to authors who couldn't get published otherwise.

And I still believe that the # 2 reason talented authors don't get published is unwillingness to do the work.

I've learned not to offer these because there are so many reasons they may not get published.

It also reveals the only three reasons that talented authors don't get published.

And that there are only two reasons talented authors don't get published:

Nothing annoys me more than good books not getting published because of a marketing fad that produces ridiculously bad books.

Not getting a publishing contract has become less important as a reason.

But, she had the goal of being a published author by the time she was 26, just like Stephen King, and used it as a «deadline» for herself: If she didn't get a publishing deal by the age of 26, she'd do it herself.

I've been involved in publishing startups for the a little over six years now and have participated in quite a few «publishers don't get startups» and «startups don't get publishing» discussions.

«There are people who want to put books on Amazon because they can not get publishing deals and that is understandable.

Ms. Patchett assumes that authors publishing their own books are either people «who want to put books on Amazon because they can not get publishing deals» or «authors who could get published in the mainstream....»

They haven't seen the vast majority of what didn't get published — and believe me, if you have, it's enough to make your blood run cold, thinking about that stuff being introduced into the general population.

For many authors, a developmental editor's help means the difference between getting published or not getting published.

And I love it, because I'm passionate about building community and totally believe we can write alone but we can't get published alone — or succeed alone.

You don't get a publishing contract after all, or you get a contract but a worse deal than originally offered.

Not the author couldn't get it published elsewhere.

I am under no illusions that my book is better than a LOT of books that didn't get published.

«Don't get published for a reason?»

But they are far from a majority, and they generally can't get published in the better magazines.

Well you can't get published in the publishing industry without one... unless you self - publish then you don't need one.