Sentences with phrase «n't give a jurisdiction»

Of course the Ontario Tribunal declined to deal with the complaint against Macleans for Mark Steyn's column about the perceived dangers of Islam, on the ground that its statute did not give it jurisdiction over expresson.

Not exact matches

«The message I've clearly given to government and regulators is that we need to work on this competitive position versus other jurisdictions, and we won't be making big investment decisions until we start to see some progress on that.»

Given that they are held outside the country, they are not under the jurisdiction of the Federal Reserve.

The suit alleges that the law gives the Ugandans standing to sue Lively for his activities, which had a crucial nexus in the U.S. and therefore come under federal courts» jurisdiction; it also charges that Lively not only advocated bad ideas in an abstract context but helped various Ugandans conceive and manage a campaign of persecution, thus involving himself in a joint criminal enterprise.

I don't suggest we give churches jurisdiction to raid restaurant kitchens (although, honestly, I could probably be talked into it!

Furthermore, given that our high Reb M extracts are produced only from the leaf, our extracts can be used as sweeteners in jurisdictions such as Europe that otherwise do not permit such use of stevia extracts when produced using bioconversion or fermentation methods.

Use of the Site is unauthorized in any jurisdiction that does not give effect to all provisions of these Terms, including, without limitation, this section.

Use of the Challenge Success Web Site is unauthorized in any jurisdiction that does not give effect to all provisions of these terms and conditions, including without limitation this paragraph.

Section (d) of the authorization document states that Mueller has to discuss any crime that doesn't fall within his «Jurisdiction» as layed out by the Attorney General with the AG, who can then determine if it should be added to the Jurisdiction, or given to an authority that can prosecute it.

He said when his lawyers appeared in court, Justice Torkonoo «surprisingly purported to exercise jurisdiction over the contempt application although that was not the business of the day and gave a ruling vacating the earlier order she made dismissing the said application.»

When the UN special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary, or arbitrary executions made inquiries into drone attacks in 2002, and again in 2005, the U.S. responded by claiming that such incidents do not fall within the jurisdiction of the rapporteur, given that the applicable law is the international law of armed conflict.

But sudden big changes in the UK constitution are not easily accepted, as we have seen with the likes of giving more power to the EU and the Human Rights Act, which gives the European Court of Human Rights jurisdiction in the UK and which the Tories want to replace.

@Anixx But the thing is... in most jurisdictions just wanting to protect your personal interest when they are not a crime doesn't give you the right to remain silent (at least not in court).

Given that most jurisdictions» boards meet only monthly, these are not moves that invite serious deliberation.

Don't forget, in western jurisdictions the legal system is as much about the precedence of prior interpretation and / or application of a given law as much the written law itself.

If you have a single jurisdiction that can control the entire corporate tax system, one of the easiest and most common ways to integrate corporate and individual level income taxes is to impose taxes on corporate profits at the corporate level, but then to give recipients of dividends who are subject to domestic income taxes a credit equal to the percentage of income paid by the dividend paying corporation, treating the corporate income tax as a withholding tax that becomes final when dividends are distributed to foreign taxpayers who don't pay domestic income taxes.

Similarly in the motion brought by former President Goodluck Jonathan praying Justice Abang to set aside the subpoena issued to him to appear in court to give evidence for Metuh, the Court in a brief ruling held that it has no jurisdiction to entertain the motion argued by Chief Mike Ezekhome (SAN) for Jonathan on the ground that the former President has not been formally served with the subpoena.

The Adirondack Park Agency gave the project a negative declaration, meaning it wouldn't have had jurisdiction over it, but Tesla did a study that found the wetlands, which brought the APA back in.

This is not only useful for giving you a full insight on your learners» progress but can also serve as a digital record that you have informed your employees of specific regulations and policies in case of litigation (that said, this depends on your jurisdiction, so check with your lawyers).

Observe that Head Start contractors may align their curricula with state standards «if appropriate» — but they won't be under any obligation to do so, nor are states given any jurisdiction.

The committee found many instances in which a country's ranking goes up in a given release year, but its mean score goes down — meaning that countries are ranked higher but doing worse — or where the differences between ranked jurisdictions» scores are so statistically insignificant that the act of ranking them adds a meaning that isn't there.

The ED could order a state to respond, but if the department elected not to hear an appeal, the complainant could file suit in state court, an odd approach for a federal law to take, given that in our federal system the United States does not define the jurisdiction of state courts.

Re: the US News article on top about ESSA: Chairwoman Foxx is right about the role of the federal government in America's K - 12 education system; and families can continue to pressure educrats like Mr Botel by opting out, wherever and whenever possible, from their local state schools until the federal government gives up on the continuing mistake of its annual testing requirement in two subjects only, which has produced no significant improvement in American education for 15 years now, but has cost us in lost opportunities, including time and energy that might have been devoted to non-tested subjects, including those in the broader curricula represented by the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme, which requires assessment — including but not limited to external final exams — in six subjects distributed over at least five fields, an assessment approach that has been imitated by the world's leading educational jurisdictions, but is being discouraged by the ignorant Luddites in the the U.S. ED.

It may be possible that a given state or jurisdiction has a numerically higher average scale score than the nation or another state but that the difference is not statistically significant, while another state with the same average score may show a statistical significance compared to the nation or the other state.

Being told they had to give classrooms and other facilities in their jurisdiction to upstart charters didn't sit well with some districts; for others, it may have seemed an overwhelming task or a logistical headache.

(2) signed by an individual, or his parent, to the effect that he has been denied admission to or not permitted to continue in attendance at a public college by reason of race, color, religion, or national origin, and the Attorney General believes the complaint is meritorious and certifies that the signer or signers of such complaint are unable, in his judgment, to initiate and maintain appropriate legal proceedings for relief and that the institution of an action will materially further the orderly achievement of desegregation in public education, the Attorney General is authorized, after giving notice of such complaint to the appropriate school board or college authority and after certifying that he is satisfied that such board or authority has had a reasonable time to adjust the conditions alleged in such complaint, to institute for or in the name of the United States a civil action in any appropriate district court of the United States against such parties and for such relief as may be appropriate, and such court shall have and shall exercise jurisdiction of proceedings instituted pursuant to this section, provided that nothing herein shall empower any official or court of the United States to issue any order seeking to achieve a racial balance in any school by requiring the transportation of pupils or students from one school to another or one school district to another in order to achieve such racial balance, or otherwise enlarge the existing power of the court to insure compliance with constitutional standards.

(b) If the respondent named in a charge filed under section 706 fails or refuses to comply with a demand of the Commission for permission to examine or to copy evidence in conformity with the provisions of section 709 (a), or if any person required to comply with the provisions of section 709 (c) or (d) fails or refuses to do so, or if any person fails or refuses to comply with a demand by the Commission to give testimony under oath, the United States district court for the district in which such person is found, resides, or transacts business, shall, upon application of the Commission, have jurisdiction to issue to such person an order requiring him to comply with the provisions of section 709 (c) or (d) or to comply with the demand of the Commission, but the attendance of a witness may not be required outside the State where he is found, resides, or transacts business and the production of evidence may not be required outside the State where such evidence is kept.

Additionally the Act gives the FPB jurisdiction over films and games, but not over all published content.

Well, actually the «founders of No Kill» have always been a very select group whose love of all animals gradually but steadily led to the changing mindset and philosophy of saving rather than killing; not nearly enough credit has been given to all the independent and non-profit rescues, adoption groups and especially TNR groups who were promoting and practicing S / N and vaccinations long before low cost S / N clinics became available... such clinics still NOT that readily available in many jurisdictions; as for the veterinary community, for the most part, they were and are a major part of the problem along with their associations which remain regressive with their rather antiquated and self - serving leadership; for decades and even to this day it has long been known that the NUMBER ONE REASON people do not get their animals «fixed» (pet, stray, feral, it doesn't matter) is because of the lack of affordable S / N fenot nearly enough credit has been given to all the independent and non-profit rescues, adoption groups and especially TNR groups who were promoting and practicing S / N and vaccinations long before low cost S / N clinics became available... such clinics still NOT that readily available in many jurisdictions; as for the veterinary community, for the most part, they were and are a major part of the problem along with their associations which remain regressive with their rather antiquated and self - serving leadership; for decades and even to this day it has long been known that the NUMBER ONE REASON people do not get their animals «fixed» (pet, stray, feral, it doesn't matter) is because of the lack of affordable S / N feNOT that readily available in many jurisdictions; as for the veterinary community, for the most part, they were and are a major part of the problem along with their associations which remain regressive with their rather antiquated and self - serving leadership; for decades and even to this day it has long been known that the NUMBER ONE REASON people do not get their animals «fixed» (pet, stray, feral, it doesn't matter) is because of the lack of affordable S / N fenot get their animals «fixed» (pet, stray, feral, it doesn't matter) is because of the lack of affordable S / N fees!

have issued some rather pointed reminders to their governing cabals that unilateral decarbonization is tantamount to giving away unsupportably huge sums to every jurisdiction that doesn't do the same.

I'll give an answer for Washington State, since the question doesn't specify a jurisdiction.

Would an exception for hands - free calls be appropriate, or at least a more acceptable starting point given that not a single jurisdiction appears to have such a ban at this time?

The opinion recites four considerations that would tend to establish an ethical duty for a lawyer to warn the client against using a business device or system for electronic communication: Where the client has already communicated by electronic means or has indicated an intention to do so; where the client is employed in a position that would provide access to a workplace device or system; given the circumstances, the employer or a third party has the ability to access the email communications and; that as far as the lawyer knows, the employer's internal policy and the jurisdiction's laws do not clearly protect the privacy of the employee's personal email communications via a business device or system.

Given the limited size of the Dutch market and the fact that this is not a jurisdiction known for outrageous damages awards, the absolute amount will likely be small, presumably even below the legal fees incurred.

Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, does not, as held by the Court, give to the courts the jurisdiction to expropriate indigenous sovereignty in contravention of the previously settled constitutional law.

The first argument developed by the AG is that «[t] he use of the new approach directives may not compromise the Court's jurisdiction to give preliminary rulings» (see para. 42 - 45 of the Opinion).

The law societies do not give sufficient importance to the interactions among: (1) the problem and its consequences — the thousands of people whose lives have been damaged for lack of affordable legal services provided by competent lawyers; (2) the power of the internet, the social media, and the news media together, to make those consequences into a public and political issue so quickly that there will not be time for the law societies to publish a persuasive response, and which issue will compel government intervention by way of programs on the way to socialized law; (3) the fact that self - regulation of the legal profession has been lost by the law societies in several jurisdictions of the common law world and the U.S; [7] and, (4) the fact that the consequences of the unavailability of legal services at reasonable cost will motivate the many non-lawyer legal service providers to offer legal services that should be provided by lawyers, to people desperate for a lawyer's services that they can not afford.

Its main, if not only, controversial feature is that it does not allow the enforcing court to review the jurisdiction of the court giving the judgment.

However, in view of the objective of foreseeability, which the rules on jurisdiction must pursue, the place of establishment of that server can not, by reason of its uncertain location, be considered to be the place where the event giving rise to the damage occurred for the purpose of the application of Article 5 (3) of Regulation No 44/2001.

As Cathy Kirkman reports today at Silicon Valley Media Law, a California appeals court issued a decision holding that the Florida dealer's «worldwide» Internet advertising was not enough to give California courts jurisdiction.

The question was asked as to whether or not there was the potential for a clash between the Commercial Court Long Trials Working Group's Report and the work of this review; Jackson LJ expressed the need for caution in changing the procedures of the Commercial Court given its position as the court of choice for litigants from other jurisdictions.

Usually, there are only a handful of traffic offenses that are not primary offenses in any given jurisdiction, and some jurisdictions would have none.

She said the case law of other jurisdictions was not helpful given the clear statements on the law.

«In IP law, the fact you found your working materials in a particular jurisdiction doesn't give those people rights.

The issue is not jurisdiction, is the territorial application given to the law.

Given that the Agency's jurisdiction to entertain a complaint under section 172 (1) turns almost exclusively on its own discretionary decision - making, section 172 (1) is a jurisdiction - granting, not jurisdiction - limiting, provision.

But, so far, Congress has not altered a status quo that does not give U.S. District Courts the maximal jurisdiction allowed under the United States Constitution.

Ask and you shall be given not only case references, potentially in multiple jurisdictions, but also the relevant case segments.

«The jurisdiction says «don't worry, it's all safe because we're now part of the New York Convention», but awards are still very difficult to enforce, given that the national courts aren't free of outside interference — be it political or otherwise,» he notes.

It seeks to ensure fairness... It gives a court broad, equitable jurisdiction to enforce not just what is legal but what is fair» (2008 SCC 69 at para 68).