Sentences with phrase «n't good behaviour»

Not exact matches

In the past, a good number of pets were put down for behaviours that their owners couldn't deal with, such as uncontrollable urination, for example.

He invests long - term in a limited number of well understood businesses, a model he says emulates the behaviour of the world's super-rich, who don't constantly churn their portfolios and who don't flip their investments when markets dive.

His managerial behaviour is steeped in the premise that all parties — employee, boss, company — are better off when people are pushed to live up to their potential, when «good enough» isn't good enough.

«Most of the problems are rooted in not having a good system in place to address the behaviour of minority parties,» Drexhage says.

If wage negotiations, for example, were to build in current low expected price increases — of the order of 2 to 3 per cent — that kind of behaviour would clearly produce better national outcomes than if larger increases (not backed by genuine productivity gains) were pursued and granted, only to be followed by a tightening of policy.

It can be used to drive behaviours that aren't in the customer's best interest.

CBA's pay structure had «little sting for senior managers» and until recently rewarded behaviour that did not produce good customer outcomes, the regulator's report says.

Also, the HighLow broker is very well institutionally organized that it is not likely for traders to experience any mischievous activity or any unethical behaviour from this broker.

I don't think God will excuse well meaning behaviour.

Not all Jews believe this, BTW, but in Judaism I have yet to run across someone who believe that G - d would punish anyone for their «beliefs» and not their «deeds» (take a good look at the Tanach... the contract with the Jews (known as the «teachings of G - d», not «the law») is all about behaviour; and while many Christians have been raised to view «the teachings of G - d» (the law) as something to be «freed» from... one has to ask the simple questioNot all Jews believe this, BTW, but in Judaism I have yet to run across someone who believe that G - d would punish anyone for their «beliefs» and not their «deeds» (take a good look at the Tanach... the contract with the Jews (known as the «teachings of G - d», not «the law») is all about behaviour; and while many Christians have been raised to view «the teachings of G - d» (the law) as something to be «freed» from... one has to ask the simple questionot their «deeds» (take a good look at the Tanach... the contract with the Jews (known as the «teachings of G - d», not «the law») is all about behaviour; and while many Christians have been raised to view «the teachings of G - d» (the law) as something to be «freed» from... one has to ask the simple questionot «the law») is all about behaviour; and while many Christians have been raised to view «the teachings of G - d» (the law) as something to be «freed» from... one has to ask the simple question..

«Tts 2:3 - 4 The aged women likewise, that [they be] in behaviour as becometh holiness, not false accusers, not given to much wine, teachers of good things; That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children,»!!

There is no good reason why she lied: she wasn't saving him, or sparing him, or even truly hiding any nefarious behaviour.

On the Crusades — «not the proudest moment in Christian history but nor were they the childish caricature of modern Western guilt and certainly not that of contemporary Muslim paranoia» — he goes into some detail to describe not only the background and the geopolitical state of things, but also the realities of human behaviour, both good and bad.

Insurance companies are well aware of the phenomenon in which people who take out insurance against, say, burglary, are known (on average if not in every case) to modify their behaviour so that the risk of being burgled increases.

If the father behaves in an unorthodox fashion, well, it is not the first time that paternal love has overstepped the bounds of conventional religious behaviour.

I appreciate it would be wrong to turn a blind eye to all the bad and not so good things the Church does, the wrong behaviour in the name of Jesus, but why oh why do you guys on these blogs continually go on and on about them.

1 Timothy 3:2 A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach; 1 Timothy 3:5 (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?)

Now, I know all the arguments: they were not alone in this behaviour, it was the culture of the time, the Catholics were just as bad, etc, but if we want to truly remember the Reformation then the best way is not merely to get all excited about the theology, but also to be honest about the dodgy goings - on.

All his good conduct and religious behaviour was only disguising the problem, not solving it.

Not only did the theologians at the university want «the silly bag tamed,» her uncle, Adam von Thering was angry that her unladylike behaviour had brought shame on their family's name and he «wanted her walled up for good.»

As for my behaviour good, bad or indifferent, or stupid there isn't any important idea communicating with foccssin on that now is there.

They, HL, didn't give a good god damn about the coverage until it became a political ploy, such hypocrisy from the Baptists is standard behaviour.

I think we can get closer to god if we pray selflessly and with full devotion and we do not go on a wrong path i.e. we have a good behaviour for others and we consider all as equal and we respect all and love all the creations of god and try not to hurt anyone.

This is, admittedly, a very important matter and my own desire to investigate the «higher» and more complex aspects of animal behaviour, and not to rest content with Lloyd Morgan's injunction, may well have been due to my early reading of Whitehead.

In other words, neither behaviour is good, and any behaviour that negatively affects another is bad, doubly so if said behaviour is because a book of supernatural tribal myths says it's OK, and even more so if each side does not share the same myths.

However, if my Son were to hit my wife, I might want to encourage him to think about better behaviour... and maybe Paul wasn't completely off his trolley when he encouraged christians to «put on» Christ.

If, however, one believes, following Einstein, that quantum mechanics describes the behaviour of an ensemble of similar systems, then not only do the well - known quantum paradoxes vanish, but it leaves intact the possibility of a fully deterministicsubstratum.

It is with a certain wry amusement that we note how many of the staunchest supporters of «women's rights» in the American establishment do not question the US support of the Taliban even though the latter's behaviour in this area is well known!

It's been very touch and go, as she's had a lot of behaviour issues, well they're not issues to her but of course to us they have been.

The children (one of whom is her godchild) are on good behaviour, we make sure everything is comfortable and that she doesn't have to do anything and we make the best food possible.

1 May 2015 Media Statement Australian beverages industry responds to Cambridge University study linking soft drinks and diabetes «Leading health organisations, including the World Diabetes Federation, agree that the known risk factors for type 2 diabetes include lifestyle factors, such as obesity and sedentary behaviour, as well as family history, age and ethnicity — not -LSB-...]

4TH is NOT A TROPHY!!!!!! AND WHEN YOU ARE A CLUB THAT CHARGES THE PROCES WE DO THE CURRENT SITUATION IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH!!!!! our manager is tactically inept and has no idea of who to buy whenever the price is too high (quibbling over half a million for a 17 year old polish kid, really???) iTS NOT GOOD ANOUGH, WE ARE THE MIGHTY ARSENAL AND THIS BEHAVIOUR IS BOTH EMBARRESSING AND BENIETH US.

I wasn't impressed with the behaviour of the Leicester team or their fans, thought they were better than that — they bizarrely seem to think they are a «big» club now, and have all the attitude but none of the attributes.

Far better that they say «We dug up some dirt, why not take a look» instead of labelling those involved as some how sub human and then trying to force down our throats the impression that we as members of the public should be offended by the behaviour of the individuals concerned.

Wenger can't comment on his behaviour because it shows weakness for our opponents and of Wenger wants to sell him then poor conduct BEING Made PUBLIC IS NOT Good.

I'm so sick of people telling those of us who are disgruntled fans to relax and give this club time to correct itself... for anyone who believes that taking a wait - and - see approach is appropriate at this juncture they should take a good long look at themselves in the mirror because they are a big part of the problem... no other «big» club's fans would stand for this shit for nearly as long as we have... think about it, we've witnessed a changing of the guard at every major club in England, Spain, France and Germany in the last several years because those «big» clubs failed to live up to expectations (Barcelona, Real Madrid, Bayern, PSG, Chelsea, ManU, ManCity etc...)... for some reason, many fans have become as fragile as our current manager, believing that there couldn't possibly be a suitable replacement, even though everyone of these clubs have found multiple replacements and still achieved far more than our club... this mindset has been created by an organization that has been milking it's fans, telling countless lies (no world class players available) and lowering expectations every since they rolled out the biggest lie of all: that we couldn't spend because of the new stadium but once it was paid off we could compete with any team in the world... this organization is rotting from the inside out and if we don't demand that those in charge put soccer first this despicable behaviour won't end with Wenger's ridiculous 2 year contract... I think the real fear isn't that a suitable replacement doesn't exist, but that this organization is so money hungry and poorly mismanaged that we will sink even lower by choosing our next coach the same way they choose our players, on the cheap... even so, we need to see what mustache will do if left to his own devices so he will have to show his true colours... only then can we purge this club and start anew

Let's face it goalkeepers tend to march to the beat of a different drum and Szczesny certainly fell into that category, but most of his antics were relatively harmless and simply reflected a certain level of immaturity that isn't uncommon for someone thrust into the limelight at such a young age... lord knows we've seen that happen with numerous players throughout the years and very few were ever banished for such behaviour... the only on - field action that drove me crazy was his inability to take a deep breath and not try to rush the play with an ill - timed throw at certain points in the game when common sense suggested holding the ball and slowing things down... the fact that he continued to do this probably had a lot to do with the glaring lack of coaching time spent with the goalkeepers... ultimately he made the fateful decision to take his frustrations out into the public sphere and paid dearly for it... in the end, his services were wanted by several of the best Italian squads, which is significant considering the historical importance placed on the defensive side of the ball in Serie A... all I know is that if someone asked me to pick the most athletically gifted goalkeeper we have had in our squad since the arrival of Wenger, without hesitation, he would be my pick and for that reason his departure is more than a little disappointing... what else is new though

Everyone knows wenger has missed out on the best players in the world his whole life bcoz he wouldn't saction 3 million pound extra it's tiny petty behaviour it's West Ham type Tactics!

if the Ox was played to either showcase his skills or to increase any potential bids because of his perceived importance to our starting 11, this was an incredibly risky move that could have cost us dearly... imagine if he was injured or played poorly, like he did, and this negatively impacted our ability to get the best available deal... more importantly, why was Wenger willing to play someone who obviously wants out in such an important game under false pretenses... this kind of behaviour might be less offensive in April, when things are done and dusted, but to do this following a loss against a supposed main rival that pipped us for fourth by a point last year, could be considered at best inappropriate and at worst treasonous... we can't afford to let this coach make business decisions on game day, which has gone on for far too long

He had some behaviours that were shocking but I think as well you don't see them anymore since two, three years.

The Portuguese may not have intended to aim that at anyone in particular, but Klopp and Conte are perhaps the most well known in the Premier League for the kind of behaviour he seemed to be referring to.

of the remaining 22, 11 will be needed on the weekends to play PL and the other 11, who have to be good too, will play in CL or FA etc. but instead of getting worldclass strikers, wenger chooses to protect the careers of his favorite giroud by not buying (actually, i also think he wants to buy but he has self - defeating behaviours such as cheapness, stubborness and slowness).

The reason many decent people shun football and look down on those who support and play it, is precisely because there is so much bad behaviour, defiance of refs, deliberate breaking and bending of the rules and sheer hypocrisy by football people who pay only lip service to this change but actually have not the guts, honesty or decency to change it for the better.

Whether or not the decision is too soft or not, one thing's for sure is he won't have done his F1 chances much good with his behaviour.

I don't think he needs to have this behaviour because he is better than that as a driver, he is a good driver.

Alexis obviously wants out, so let him go on our terms, trying to force someone to do well doesn't work unless they are willing to, his behaviour at the moment provides no evidence that he vwant to win with us

That's the sort of behaviour you'd expect from 12 - year - olds in public lobbies on F1 2017, not the professional world of iRacing, the ultra-realistic sim racing «game» populated with some of the world's best virtual and real - life drivers.

Im not suggesting that we encourage aggressive behaviour but its a contact sport and the opposition need to be physically intimidated as well as out played and we don't have anyone who appears to do that.

This season Abramovich didn't put up bucket loads of cash which probably created a shift in power towards the squad, Mourhinho had his ego bruised by the physio issue and what people thought of his behaviour, and he found out that doing the unmentionable and dumping on your players in public doesn't go down well.

Szczesny OUT Cech IN, let alone his bad behaviour which is not suited for a reputable club like Arsenal he's just not good enough we must get rid of him!