Sentences with phrase «n't haggle»

Sellers are used to price negotiations, but don't haggle too much or make clumsy offers.

When we go to the grocery store, we don't haggle.

However, don't haggle too much — we ended up with a bad lobster after some serious haggling.

Most people don't haggle on prices for diamonds, but it never hurts to try.

Didn't haggle to much over price and didn't run up a bunch of fees and the like.

So I didn't haggle with the dealer, paying full list price.

Hello, even spurs are now better than us on the field, we simply let every team outplay us, Bayern, sevilla, Swansea, almost every team now play possessive football against us Everton and big teams don't haggle over price, they simply pay and get the players they want, our transfers take too long to get done because we make them.

«You don't haggle on price, but when you go to a store and you find a good product for 40 % off, you buy it,» he says.

Don't apologize, don't haggle.

In 1901, steel magnate Andrew Carnegie sold his entire empire to JP Morgan for $ 480 million — a sum he had scribbled on a piece of paper and that Morgan did not haggle over.

The statements made loosely by my friends in Dakar about the re-negotiation of taxi prices fit with the notion of the individual's (in this case the taxi man) actions as greed - driven: He is already receiving a salary for his work and therefore should not haggle and re-haggle for «extra» money, regardless of how inadequately paid he is.

I called back, looked at the truck and it was just as Erin descrided it and went into the finance manager and did not haggle on the price as the truck was in «mint» shape.

There was not haggle or stalking me over the phone after my first visit.

Not every haggling showdown will go your way, but that doesn't mean you have to declare defeat.

So Microsoft (NSDQ: MSFT) is not taking the bait, at least not yet: Bill Gates said Microsoft is not haggling on the bid price with Yahoo be...

And I'm supposed to believe turnkey providers prefer to sell at a lower price if it means not haggling?

Not exact matches

What I did not do was haggle over the price with the vendor.

BBC doesn't hesitate to haggle.

To be fair, medical inflation is higher than general inflation, and biopharma companies have the unenviable task of explaining that a gross list price increase isn't the same thing as the net they'll take away from that increase after haggling with insurers and pharmacy benefits managers.

A number of U.S. states don't allow the practice, but with car buyers grossly dissatisfied with the existing process — which typically involves haggling with sales people — it's a situation ripe for disruption.

Trump, however, is not expected to go into much detail about deductions and loopholes on Wednesday as congressional Republicans and the White House continue to haggle over which ones to target.

The website makes car - buying haggle - free, with prices below market value, so customers can rest easy knowing they aren't getting ripped off.

In the past you may have made a big haggle over yourself for not being hip enough to handle another's idiosyncrasies.

My point is: Quit haggling over the semantics if you are not goiing to bother using the correct symantics yourself.

Especially not in the academic world, where the most intense intellectual commerce often involves exchanging, and haggling over, the semantic equivalent of wooden....

But the flip side here is that Mary Beth Brown is a human being, not a bag of apples to be haggled over.

Arsenal are haggling over new contracts for our two star players, but yet again, they don't mind giving a new contract, worth a lot of money, to a player that's never been that good, hasn't even played for a long time, near the end of his career, and who is probably our fourth / fifth choice CB.

one, the deal isn't done yet because Wenger is still haggling the price of the player and two, All the main media reports were already stating that Arsenal were deep in negotiations for Lacazette, long before Beavers and Butthead Came along, blowing his own trumpet.

His perennial contract haggling (always hard to tell whether it's the player or the agent or simply the press) seems in bad taste, for someone who doesn't regularly do the business.

This is exactly the type of versatile player that Arsenal need right now, as he can play as a winger or a striker, and anyone who can score 8 La Liga goals in 10 games (while not playing for Madrid or Barcelona) is definitely worth taking a chance on, especially for a price that works out at just over 14m GBP without any haggling.

This are bright times at the emirates... we don't need haggle price anymore..

And spent months haggling over # 500 for Hazard before Chelski stepped in and months haggling over Mata before again Chelski stepped in, and months over Jovetic before MC stepped in, although that didn't turn out too well.

The problem is no one knows whats happening media makes up everything to sell papers, There is more than a good chance we have not offered the price they want and are probably haggling over a couple of mill, Do nt rate mahrez, Would rather pay more for lemar.

why is it other clubs go out, and do the deals, whereas we are constantly haggling over price, or hearing wenger say we will be active, and then gadzidis say we can not compete.

Wenger said yesterday that he was sorry he didn't spend # 55mil on Rob Holding, interesting comment, if he thinks Rob Holding is worth a lot of money then why did he haggle with Bolton and only offer them # 750k?

The only reason this isn't getting a higher grade is due to a little hesitation from the source of the rumor: Morosi says that the Yankees also want Sonny Gray from the A's, so there is a possibility that they go with Gray instead, or that this gets too big and the Yankees end up missing out on both players while haggling over details.

A quick start and not much haggling to reduce it, not like previous years where we would hang on till last day of transfer to get 10p knocked off the price...

While the two teams could haggle and figure something out, it looks like a rumor that is coming from one front office because they obviously like a good player, but that doesn't have any real chance of happening.

No offence to Lucas perez but going by that evidence I can't see Arsenal paying # 200,000 aweek to both Sanchez and Ozil without a long hard haggling battle.?

A great signing and a absolute bargain??? (# 2.5 million) I can't believe that Wenger haggled over this kids fee?

Haggling clearly isn't what is going on!

That way we could haggle more on the price and not get involved in a crazy bidding war.

Personally I don't see Arsenal paying 60 + million for Van Diyk when we are haggling for Lemar.

Not like Nasri... Not like Henry... Not like Pires... Shall I go on and list when AFC did pay to get the player without haggling like a penny pincher?

Yet for the past 80 days Wenger has been hampered in selling players by the board haggling over 1/2 million evaluation of players as well as not making funds available to purchase players.

but with Wenger even if he approaches a club, he haggles to low or he asks top player to try out and other nonsensical reasons not to sign some player

Arsenal haggling over certain numbers that were believed to not be an issue.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

never waste CAPITAL LETTERS on an article about Chambers at this juncture... I still can't believe that no one from management has ever explained why such a frugal club spent so much money on him in the first place... we haggle for months and years with clubs for players who could have a monumental impact on the very future of our club but somehow we found $ 16 million for someone who couldn't regularly crack a Southampton lineup (very fishy)... don't get me wrong, I like what he showed at times last season in Middlesbourogh but from the handful of games I watched him play I still have some serious questions about his consistency as a back - line player in the EPL; as such he should prove himself on loan for another season, making sure that he goes to a team that wants him in the starting 11... bottom line, let's not get bogged down with the semantics of peripheral players and focus on the real task at hand = figure out who the hell is going to be our starting 11 for the foreseeable future, which means getting contracts signed, getting rid of a lot of deadwood and bringing in talented players into the positions which truly need upgrading... the rest is just unnecessary noise

Walcott is centre - forward because Wenger failed to get a striker by deadline day because of his nauseating incompetence at haggling or paying what teams ask for... and so far Walcott is proving what I have said for seasons now, he is not a centre - forward at the standard required for Top 4 clubs with high ambitions, pots of cash, high capacity stadiums.