Sentences with phrase «n't hear a claim»
News The appeals court cited a Supreme Court ruling in June that placed limits on where injury lawsuits could be filed, saying state courts can not hear claims against companies not based in the state where alleged injuries occurred.
http://generalcounselnews.com/
The Small Claims Court will not hear claims involving:
Not exact matches
In addition to claims he didn't know what clingfilm was — and was heard «shrieking» at the site of kitchen staff using it to wrap up cold cuts — and that he takes truckloads of possessions, including his own toilet seat, with him on royal trips, Tom Bower's «Rebel Prince» includes a number of claims about Charles» extravagant travel habits.
But when you claim that you've «beaten» your main competitor, Lyft, and say that an additional service will be more expensive and you hear that people don't trust you anymore because things keep changing and they can't make rational plans, getting angry and blaming them isn't the solution.
If you hear from someone claiming to be from the IRS, though, first make sure that the contact isn't a scam.
Jed Shugerman, a Fordham law professor, told Business Insider in an email that Republicans» claims in the aftermath of the Comey hearing were «not good - faith arguments» based on the testimony.
«This case has already been dismissed with prejudice by the court that heard it, which ruled in Yelp's favor and also found the claims not to be supported by credible evidence,» Vince Sollitto, Yelp's vice president of communications said.
The big tech companies claim they haven't heard of the National Security Agency's program called PRISM.
The Facebook CEO and founder has been repeating the claim that, technically, the site doesn't sell users» data during his Congressional hearings.
Companies typically do not hear from government officials directly, and some are flat - out denying the claims.
During the House committee hearing on Wednesday, Zuckerberg claimed not to know what «shadow profiles» are, even though this term has been used for years to describe Facebook's collection of data about people who don't use its services by harvesting the inboxes and smartphone contacts of active Facebook users.
That said, some are hesitant: this Twitter user, a Japanese investor, claims that, in fact, the September 18th court hearing is irrelevant because Kobayashi already has been authorized to sell - off — meaning he doesn't have to wait to off - load more coins.
Of the people surveyed, 82.2 percent said they had heard about the allegations publicized by the Washington Post, including one woman who claims Moore had sexual contact with her when she was 14 and he was 32, but regardless, nearly three - fourths of Republicans don't want their candidate to drop out.
«This person told this unnamed person about what they hear this person saw, and so I wrote it down, but you won't know who I am either» just doesn't cut it, Chad when it comes to supernatural claims.
Hardly, after man came up with then disregarded as utter nonsense the previous 10,000 or so gods in existence, we decided not to jump on the current bandwagon claiming salvation for the believer and damnation for the rest... Pray tell, what became of all the people who had never the chance to hear of his words / deeds after he came and died?
I don't claim to hear from God a lot, but the still small voice whispered in my ear, «Greater is he that is in you; do not be afraid».»
If women's health were really a concern for anyone who claims moral objection, they wouldn't have excluded women from the congressional hearing.
If modern Christians have a sense of martyrdom as you claim then please feel free to debate them in the here and now... I don't hear a lot of Christians saying «you can't say / do this because 2,000 years ago Rome was busy killing us.»
I don't think we are doing that since not a single person yet is claiming to do that (this is your assumption of what you are hearing from others).
If I am the yawner you claim ---- well, I expect not to hear from you again.
Yes I know this will happen because I have been through these arguments time and time again and when I pull out my Bible that people claim to have read and match it to the scientific evidence that points very clearly to the validity and truth of the Bible they shut up and don't want to hear it.
b. South Park and «factual» are oxymorons c. I have heard many if not most of the claims made to refute the Book of Mormon including yours below.
and you believe everything you see and hear from the media, especially the ones who claim to be objective when in fact they are totally not?
the scriptures do not claim as you state «infallible word of God» ------ Well, this is something I've been hearing for years, in church from pastors and in person from christians.
Isn't it quite obvious and apparent, based upon hearing about all the children, women, and men dying tragic deaths everyday in the news that God does not exist in the form the Bible claims?
NCR gives a link to some of these doubts by «Vatican experts»: unfortunately, these «experts» include John Cornwell, author of Hitler's Pope, who said he had never heard the claims described by Pacepa and considers them «most unlikely», though «as a supporter of Nato and the Western Alliance, it's not inconceivable the pope could have been targeted [by the KGB].
But it didn't actuallly get crazy until later that SAME day we were watching TV and heard the news of Morgan Freeman's granddaughter E'Dena Hines being fatally stabbed to death in an insane exorcisim where her boyfriend had apparently claimed she was a demon.
Doug had nothing to do with it, so I'm not sure why you've heard he has allegedly claimed such.
It gets very frustrating after a while when those who claim to be silenced are also not heard when they do speak.
What you just descibed is the definition of a hallucination, the fact that you claim you can see and hears thing that can't be measured does not make you spiritual, it makes you delusional.
That means I do not believe any of the god claims I have heard, because there is never, ever, any hard, verifiable, logical, objective evidence to support them.
CHristians want to talk about how wonderful their religion is but can't stand hearing rebutals to that claim.
I do hear your points that you think I have not seen the need for warning of danger, that you believe I think of it as «unChristian» to talk about such things, and that you may even believe that my comments are akin to protecting evil deeds and harming the innocent, using the bible as a proof texting weapon to that end and contributing to a problem of church becoming fake and shallow while claiming to be deep and pious.
And if after merely hearing about it they decide it's not worth their extremely limited time to investigate those claims that conflict with their local religion, or they don't have the literacy to «study» it, they'll probably make that «wrong» choice to not believe it, so we've just consigned them to hell, haven't we?
I could see a god who caused the universe to begin and hasn't been heard from since, but I don't buy any of the religions that claim a personal god that has interacted with humanity in any way.
We've all heard claims that «worship isn't just singing.»
The bible is an ancient text written by men who CLAIMED to hear god's word... that is not proof.
They never heard of the word «specie» then so don't claim they used «genus» for «kind».
Whenever I hear someone claiming that CNN is wildly unbiased in Obama's favor, I can't help but think that that is the perfect example of what has happened to the political right over the last 30 years.
Jeffery, i have never... NOT ONCE heard any Christian deny the existence of dinasours or claim that the earth is only 6000 years old.
According to Barth, Mozart «heard the harmony of creation to which the shadows also belong but in which shadow is not darkness, deficiency is not defeat, sadness can not become despair, trouble can not degenerate into tragedy and infinite melancholy is not ultimately forced to claim undisputed sway.»
Touchingly, if not believably, some writers claim that the conspiracy of silence was so complete that in their twenties and thirties they had not once heard homosexuality discussed, never mind homosexuality among priests or religious.
radiation, barely any human is biologically capable of perceiving radiation, but most are not going to claim that they can't see, hear, smell and directly feel radiation and therefore they are not going to evacuate when needed, are they?
However, when he was asked a few years ago about his 2007 comments, he responded on Twitter claiming: «The quote on abortion is not a publication I've ever heard of or read or seen!»
I'm not sure which is worse: people who claim to see or hear supernatural beings or those who believe them.
While we hear other Jews say holy books mentioned it as being the forbidden land for the Jews and not being the God given promised land as those under the cloth claim?
@ Alias: because you begin by assuming God's an idiot (a self - refuting concept), you don't even hear the complexity of what the biblical God is claiming.
Before, as was my habit, self I claimed: True Self I did not see, although I heard it named.
8... «do not even claim to have been witnesses» 1 John 1:1 «That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked at and our hands have touched — this we proclaim concerning the Word of life.»
I don't believe for one moment he knew everything and I've never heard anyone claim he did.